寄托天下
查看: 1596|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3第三题求翻译求解释!! [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
37
寄托币
115
注册时间
2012-7-3
精华
0
帖子
25
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-5 14:06:44 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Juries in criminal trials do not base verdict on uncorroborated testimony given by any one witness. rightly so, because it is usually prudent to be highly skeptical of unsubstantiated claims made by any one person. but then, to be consistent, juries should end an all-to-common practice: convicting defendants on the basis of an uncorroborated full confession.

逻辑support题,以下哪个strengthen.
我选的c: defendants sometimes make full confession when they did in fact do what they are accused of doing and have come to believe that the prosecutor has compelling proof of this
答案是d: highly suggestible people who are accused of wrongdoing sometimes become so unsure of their own recollection of the past that they can come to accept the accusations made against them.

求解释啊!!!!尤其是求翻译!!!文章完全没看懂。。。
回应
0

使用道具 举报

声望
5
寄托币
127
注册时间
2011-9-5
精华
0
帖子
26
沙发
发表于 2012-7-5 23:40:51 |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
37
寄托币
115
注册时间
2012-7-3
精华
0
帖子
25
板凳
发表于 2012-7-6 09:34:33 |只看该作者
Forgates 发表于 2012-7-5 23:40
选C的话,楼主应该还是能看懂的吧,题目有点绕而已,我觉得关键在最后一句话“convicting defendants on th ...

嗯,但是“become so unsure of their own recollection of the past”要在哪里体现呢?文章中没有讲到犯人对自己过去做过什么回忆不清啊..是这么理解吧..

使用道具 举报

声望
5
寄托币
127
注册时间
2011-9-5
精华
0
帖子
26
地板
发表于 2012-7-7 15:52:18 |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

使用道具 举报

RE: 陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3第三题求翻译求解释!! [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3第三题求翻译求解释!!
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1392504-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部