BASIC RULES OF ARGUMENT EVALUATION

blxUID：3459896

BASIC RULES OF ARGUMENT EVALUATION:
A. Don't Criticize an Argument by Denying Its Conclusion
B. Don't Accept an Argument Simply Because You Believe the Conclusion
C. Direct Criticisms at Individual Premises
D. Make Your Criticisms of Premises Substantial
E. Don't Accept Competing Arguments
F. Don't Object to Intermediate Conclusions of Compound Arguments

以上文字摘自在亚马逊买的一本书Reason and Argument   ~ Richard Feldman (作者)



premise不能攻击吗？？？？？？？

烨焰UID：3247176

不攻击结论，攻击逻辑和假设，老师说的。premise说不能攻击了么？不是direct criticisms么

烨焰UID：3247176

抱歉，说错了，应该是不否定事实，否定逻辑，错误假设也是逻辑错误的一种。

crazyrobinUID：2368627

http://www.amazon.com/Manhattan- ... tion/dp/193570785X/

Evaluating the Logic of the Core

On Assumption Family questions, your job will be to evaluate the logic of the argument core. When doing so, it's important that you have the right mind-set. Let's look at the argument core again:

The sun rises only on Mondays-------->The sun does not rise on Fridays.

Here are two ways to think about it:

1. The real-world approach.
“No way! Terrible argument! We all know that the sun rises every day, not just on Mondays.”

2. The logical approach.

“Well, if we take the premise as a given truth, that the sun rises ONLY on Mondays, is this enough to substantiate the claim that the sun does NOT rise on Fridays? Yes. Logically speaking, this argument is sound.”
Now, most likely you haven't been studying for the LSAT for very long, but you've probably figured out that the LSAT folks aren't very interested in testing your ability to make evaluations of whether real-world facts are true or untrue. They are, however, very much interested in testing your ability to evaluate logic, the manner in which elements of an argument connect to one another.

In evaluating an argument, your job is NOT to evaluate the truth of its parts. Your job is to evaluate the logic: does the evidence given validate the conclusion? In this case, it does.

---

Maybe it's just my way insisting on a rigorous LSAT way.