- 最后登录
- 2013-10-30
- 在线时间
- 56 小时
- 寄托币
- 285
- 声望
- 15
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-7
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 11
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 186
- UID
- 2468098
![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level1.gif)
- 声望
- 15
- 寄托币
- 285
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-7
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 11
|
The deep sea typically has a sparse fauna dominated
by tiny worms and crustaceans, with an even sparser
distribution of larger animals. However, near
Line hydrothermal vents, areas of the ocean where warm water
emerges from subterranean sources, live remarkable
densities of huge clams, blind crabs, and fish.
Most deep-sea faunas rely for food on particulate
matter, ultimately derived from photosynthesis, falling
from above. The food supplies necessary to sustain the
large vent communities, however, must be many times
the ordinary fallout. The first reports describing vent
faunas proposed two possible sources of nutrition:
bacterial chemosynthesis, production of food by bacteria
using energy derived from chemical changes, and
advection, the drifting of food materials from surrounding
regions. Later, evidence in support of the idea of intense
local chemosynthesis was accumulated: hydrogen sulfide
was found in vent water; many vent-site bacteria were
found to be capable of chemosynthesis; and extremely
large concentrations of bacteria were found in samples of
vent water thought to be pure. This final observation
seemed decisive. If such astonishing concentrations of
bacteria were typical of vent outflow, then food within the
vent would dwarf any contribution from advection.
Hence, the widely quoted conclusion was reached that
bacterial chemosynthesis provides the foundation for
hydrothermal-vent food chains—an exciting prospect
because no other communities on Earth are independent
of photosynthesis.
There are, however, certain difficulties with this
interpretation. For example, some of the large sedentary
organisms associated with vents are also found at
ordinary deep-sea temperatures many meters from the
nearest hydrothermal sources. This suggests that bacterial
chemosynthesis is not a sufficient source of nutrition for
these creatures. Another difficulty is that similarly dense
populations of large deep-sea animals have been found in
the proximity of ―smokers‖ –vents where water emerges
at temperatures up to 350° C. No bacteria can survive such
heat, and no bacteria were found there. Unless smokers
are consistently located near more hospitable warm-water
vents, chemosynthesis can account for only a fraction of
the vent faunas. It is conceivable, however, that these
large, sedentary organisms do in fact feed on bacteria that
grow in warm-water vents, rise in the vent water, and then
rain in peripheral areas to nourish animals living some
distance from the warm-water vents.
Nonetheless, advection is a more likely alternative
food source. Research has demonstrated that advective
flow, which originates near the surface of the ocean
where suspended particulate matter accumulates,
transports some of that matter and water to the vents.
Estimates suggest that for every cubic meter of vent
discharge, 350 milligrams of particulate organic
material would be advected into the vent area. Thus, for
an average-sized vent, advection could provide more
than 30 kilograms of potential food per day. In addition,
it is likely that small live animals in the advected water
might be killed or stunned by thermal and/or chemical
shock, thereby contributing to the food supply of vents.
6. The information in the passage suggests that the
majority of deep-sea faunas that live in nonvent
habitats have which of the following characteristics?
(A) They do not normally feed on particles of food
in the water.
(B) They are smaller than many vent faunas.
(C) They are predators.
(D) They derive nutrition from a chemosynthetic
food source.
(E) They congregate around a single main food
source.
7. Select the sentence in the passage in which the author
implies that vents are colonized by some of the same
animal found in other areas of the ocean floor, which
might be a weakness for the bacterial chemosynthesis
model. |
|