issue52 教育和社会和睦 (第2遍写）

DriverEntryUID: 143979

52"Education encourages students to question and criticize, and therefore does little to promote social harmony."

10:45

According to speakers statement, to question and criticize do harm to social harmony. If the purpose of questioning and criticizing is only to let out dissatisfaction, and social harmony only means categorical obeying, then the statement is right. However, this is not the case, so I disagree with speaker's statement.

In the first place, maybe sometimes to question and criticize are only to show one's dissatisfaction, but this is definitely not the purpose of education. The goal of teachers to encourage students to question is to teach them how to face the old ideas and thoughts and to form new ideas and thoughts of their own. These new ideas will propel the society to develop both in matter and in culture, and thus will promote social harmony. The quick development of technology in recent years is a good example for this point. Every step of development of technology needs the new ideas and criticizing with old methods, and new technology brings out plenty of fortune for human society, with which people live in a more peaceful and satisfactory society.

In the second place, social harmony does not mean categorical obeying, on the contrary, it means all the people respect one another and share a common goal that is to live happily and enjoy their work. In the feudalism society, to obey the king and other officials is so important that it is the basic rule for the governance of society. In those days, the ordinary people had no right to question and criticize the affairs of the rulers. Therefore, it is natural to teach students to obey whatever they taught in then. In contrast, our new society is a democratic and equal one, and every citizen has the right to question and criticize the policies of government. Therefore, it is important to teach students how to question and criticize. Besides, to question and criticize is a good method to express one's own ideas, and thus obtain respects of others. Needless to say, a person who obeys others all the time will hardly gain respect. With mutual respect and understanding, the society will be more peaceful.

Admittedly, since the students are still young and immature, it is also important for education to teach them to avoid doubt of everything. The purpose of questioning and criticizing is to critically accept something, not to doubt everything. Sometimes, after questioning and criticizing, the students will find that the old ideas is right, then they should accept that old ideas instead of keeping questioning. If the students only know how to question and do not know how to accept, they will learn very little and do harm to social harmony.

In sum, to question and to criticize do good to social harmony. Without these spirits, the students will hardly contribute the society after they grow up, and do little to social harmony.

11:48

雪夭UID: 142334

According to speakers statement, to question and criticize do harm to social harmony不定式还头，好奇怪，为什么不用ing？. If the purpose of questioning and criticizing is only to let out dissatisfaction表达不好, and social harmony only means categorical obeying, then the statement is right. However, this is not the case, so I disagree with speaker's statement.

In the first place, maybe sometimes to question and criticize are only to show one's dissatisfaction, but this is definitely not the purpose of education. The goal of teachers to encourage students to question 很拗口，你在用中文写还不如写educationis to teach them how to face the old ideas and thoughts and to form new ideas and thoughts of their own. These new ideas will propel the society to develop both in matter and in culture, and thus will promote social harmony. The quick development of technology in recent years is a good example for this point. Every step of development of technology needs the去 new ideas and criticizing with old methods, and new technology brings out plenty of fortune for human society, with which people live in a more peaceful and satisfactory society.不深入，太主观，还有你to的形式太多

In the second place, social harmony does not mean categorical obeying, on the contrary, it means all the people respect one another and share a common goal that is to live happily and enjoy their work. In the feudalism society, to obey the king and other officials is so important that it is the basic rule for the governance of society. In those days, the ordinary people had no right to question and criticize the affairs of the rulers. Therefore, it is natural to teach students to obey whatever they taught in then太武断，用obey在这句化里明显是argument的错误. In contrast, our new society is a democratic and equal one, and every citizen has the right to question and criticize the policies of government. Therefore, it is important to teach students how to question and criticize. Besides, to question and criticize is a good method to express one's own ideas, and thus obtain respects of others. Needless to say, a person who obeys others all the time will hardly gain respect武断，甚至在偷换概念，question和obey. With mutual respect and understanding, the society will be more peaceful.

Admittedly, since the students are still young and immature, it is also important for education to teach them to avoid of？doubt of everything. The purpose of questioning and criticizing is to critically accept something, not to doubt everything. Sometimes, after questioning and criticizing, the students will find that the old ideas is right, then they should accept that 去old ideas instead of keeping questioning. If the students only know how to question and do not know how to accept, they will learn very little and do harm to social harmony.这段散，不明确，没深入

In sum, to question and to criticize do good to social harmony. Without these spirits, the students will hardly contribute the society after they grow up, and do little to social harmony.我实在不喜欢那个to~~~你用很多次了，换下吧

总的来说还是不深入，论证不明确，句子需要变化，题目的意思不要随便的换啊，加油

DriverEntryUID: 143979

不提问，不批评就是遵守（OBEY）啊，我是想从反面来论证一味的遵守是不会促进和睦的。
另外参考了修瑞的提纲。不知道怎么才能更深入啊，能否给个范文指点一下？BOW

雪夭UID: 142334

我看的时候可能按自己的思路了，不好意思啊，不总觉得obey好想必须遵守的那中感觉，conviction可能舒服点
1、        区别和谐和一致，否则社会只会停滞或退步（正确态度，不是缺少个人思想，盲目赞同接受）
2、        质疑引进新的思想和力量来改正错误和发展社会。（Copernicus）I think，therefore i am）
3、        但是不能盲目质疑（浪费时间金钱和混乱，不尊重，否定贡献）
我没修的，这是我自己的

鱼的宝贝UID: 150861

写得比上次的好得多了，而且在限时完成（虽然超一点点），向你学习
有一点问题
1. 第一方面确实不深入。教育鼓励学生们深入研究问题，提出问题解决问题，形成自己的思想模式。从而发展文化和科技（matter在这里是什么意思？）。科技的例子很多阿，多少科学家质疑现有的观念，努力寻求新的解决方案。比如说那个烂俗的伽利略的例子：）还有很多像摩尔根质疑蒙德尔的基因遗传规律，但是在求证的过程中成了后者的忠实簇拥者，并且发展了自己的定律，和摩尔根的两条定律一起构成了遗传三大定律（好像有一点专业了）这些科学家的质疑和批评都推动了社会的进步。（我怎么老觉得社会和谐和进步密不可分阿，执著``）
2.第二论点在叙述封建社会的时候例子可以短一点，反证嘛，而且可以加上一句，那时候推崇的遵守，导致人们的不满和怀疑在心中堆积，造成了革命，推翻了封建社会。法国大革命可以说说吧（其实我也不是很清楚这个例子：（~~）
写得不错，加油阿

DriverEntryUID: 143979

TO ：雪夭，你的提纲不错，很有启发。
TO 鱼的宝贝：你心中的例子真多啊，分我一点就好了，呵呵。不过我觉得这些例子里质疑是有了，但是怎么导致社会和谐还是有点远啊。呵呵。
另外那个 IN MATTER本意是想说物质和精神上都进步，物质就用了MATTER，精神的找不到词了，就用文化代替了。SIGH