最近听力提上来一些了，看看现在我的综合写作有进步吗，离Fair有多远？

彩色哥UID: 3379503

我第一次考试的时候，小作文3个点全没听清楚，所以托福综合写作是Limit，类似的是口语3,5题，是Weak，
TPO1
The professors take the attitude that it is no necessary to change the current working mode from fives day a week for eight hours with higher salaries to four-day week with lower salaries. The reasons are as the followings:

First, The professors think reducing the working days do not conducive to control the payroll costs. There is no doubt that once reducing personal working day, the company will enroll more staff to undertake the working tasks. But the fact is that once a company enroll more new staff,and cultivate more rockie staff, this company will spend more time to educated and enlighten the staff and they also have responsible to take care of worker's health,so the cost will far beyond the expected costs.

Second, The professor hold the view that a company must provide the additional staff more workplaces and personal computer. Many companies are not willing to do it.

Third, if the number of occupations are less than the number of people who wish to find a jobs, it is inevitable that it will have a intense competition between the future employees. It is common acknowledge that a worker wish to work only four days are less competitive tha the worker can spend more time to work.


TPO4
The professors didn't agree the opinions that dinosaurs are endotherms. Several perspectives are present as the following.

First, the reading passages shows that dinasours' fossils have been existed in polar regions,however,the reading passages neglect the fact that in ancient time, the North polar was much warmer than present day, so it is not so hard to survive in that days.and also,the animals who are not endotherm are leave the places that they used to live,but the dinosaurs were not migrate to the warmer places.

Second, the reading passage indicates that endothermy and the position and movement of the legs have a strong connection, but the professor think the dinasours are not necessary to run. so it can not prove the opinion presents above is true.

Last but not the least, the professors says that dinosaurs have a week bone, and this species can't rapid growing, and deduct the perspective that dinosours are not endotherms.

TPO5
The professor generally take the attitude that there has no persuasive evidence for the reading passage's perspective.
Initially, the professor think there were not so many people residented in the house of Chaco structures. At least, fire places was scanty indicate that the number of people lived there is very low. Moreover, the biggest house only contained 10 people.
Additionally, there is also lack the strong evident that Chaco structures had a function of storing food.The container's is small so that could not supply sufficient food.
Finally, the professors think houses were used as ceremonial also seemed preposterous. Because in the Pueblo Alto, there was so many construction material like sand, stone,etc.Conspicuously there had not possibility that houses were used for the center of ceremony. and the reading passage emphasized there was a great number of pots exist there, but the professors debates that pot served as containing trash.


TPO7
The professors hold the optimistic attitude that wood product with ecocertification will welcomed by consumers.
First, the reading passage says American consumers are malcontent for the exaggerate advertising claims. Nevertheless, the professors show the fact that American citizens trust the independent certificate agency, espeically, if a product have a reliable credit in International, this product w ill receive more favorable for their consumers.
Second, the reading passage arbitary think the American consumers will pay attaintion to the price of the certificated wood product.But the professors take the attitude that American consumers are not care about the price if this product passed the certificate by the authority agency.
Third, the reading passage shows that certification are only valid in the company orient to the international market.However, the professor think the American wood companies will emphasize the importance of the reputation in the world.So they will spare no effort to achieve the certifications.

TPO9
The professors are pessimistic for the current situation of Fuel-cell engines which use hydrogen for fuel.
First, The professor doesn't think automobiles fuel base on hydrogen can widely use in the future, because manufacting hydrogen need pure liquid water that hardly obtain. And the cost of manufacting hydrogen are hardly control.This method for providing energy is no use for saving money.Moreover, the store of hydrogen are also hard to store.
Second, The professor also take the attitude that producing hydrogen artificially is still far from solve the world's pollution threat. Producing hydrogen will use a plenty of coal and oil. It is universally acknowledge that collecting coal and oil will have a great pollution.
Third, The professors hold the view that producing hydrogen from water are not efficiency.The main factor is that their have no suitable material for catalyst the reaction of producing hydrogen.So it is the cause that producing hydrogen have low efficiency currently.

TPO3和TPO6没有听出来。

TPO2的误删了
我通过听力记下了这些要点：
1.队伍获得的利益无法分配到个人
2.队伍很难达成一致，一些很有用和很有创新的观点无法被全体组员接受
3.如果队伍工作任务失败了，全体组员都要背锅

TPO10也误删了（听得不好）
我通过听力记下了这些要点：
1.没有发现sea otter的尸体
2.居民改变饮食习惯
3.Location，然后不知道了

dolphin_wbyUID: 3408651

楼主的内容太少了，除了听力问题是不是打字比较慢？

看到楼主提到有两篇没听出来，应该听力还有待提高，写好综合还是要以听力为基础，这方面应加强练习。篇章结构上建议多读一些优秀的文章形成自己的套路，要确保对综合里材料内容完全不了解的人通过你的文章明白材料里说的是什么，OG上这是很重要的一条标准。

建议一步一个脚印的提高，可以先提高听力水平，练习独立写作来提高自己语言组织的能力和速度，这样以后再练综合的成文，多借鉴多思考，相信会有质的提高

彩色哥UID: 3379503

dolphin_wby 发表于 2014-7-31 15:57
楼主的内容太少了，除了听力问题是不是打字比较慢？

看到楼主提到有两篇没听出来，应该听力还有待提高， ...

这里的字数都超过150了，我最长的一篇212个字，但是一般都是150字左右

dolphin_wbyUID: 3408651

彩色哥 发表于 2014-7-31 17:23
这里的字数都超过150了，我最长的一篇212个字，但是一般都是150字左右

我觉得150还是少，不知道fair怎样，这个字数基本是拿不到good了，因为字数少内容上会不够丰富。

多研究一下OG范文吧，最好能加上reading里的理由。

makecatUID: 3503236

一般要250词左右才能覆盖所有要点，当然纯粹凑字数的废话不算。楼主这几篇还是很多要点缺失，可以对照听力的文本先修改。

彩色哥UID: 3379503

dolphin_wby 发表于 2014-7-31 21:16
我觉得150还是少，不知道fair怎样，这个字数基本是拿不到good了，因为字数少内容上会不够丰富。

多研究 ...

不知道小作文还是大作文难拿Good些

dolphin_wbyUID: 3408651

彩色哥 发表于 2014-7-31 22:09
不知道小作文还是大作文难拿Good些

每个人情况不一样看法也不一样。就我来说听力一般，感觉小作文难拿，即使拿了good也觉得因为听力不精扣了分，大作文只看写作能力不涉及综合方面，所以我觉得会比较容易。但是也有人擅长综合信息，而且顺着教授的思路写就差不多，可能觉得小作文更好得分。我觉得有时间还是要争取两个部分都做足准备。