issue3, 资金分配，为现在还是将来。超时写作，求砖盖房！

发呆的小熊UID: 139071

好几天忙得不行，没有写了今天挤出一篇，大家不要客气。马上给大家改作文。
issue3、"It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."

The speaker asserts that to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems is more important than to finance the long-term research, and I seriously doubt. As far as I am concerned, both the immediate questions and the long-term researches weigh the same to the development of the society. Overemphasizing either of them will lead to unpredictable damage to the society.

Firstly and fundamentally, the contemporary world we live in are important to us. We inhale the air every second and we drink the water everyday, hence, we care about every immediate, existing social problems that reduce the quality of our lives. The pollution, the security, the justice of the government, or the public health are all the focus of the modern people. When we inhale the toxic fumes we hope the government could allocate more money to purify it; when we suffer the threat of the social disorder, we hope the government could allocate more money to fight with the crimes; when the press freedom or the human right is violated, we hope the government could allocate money to improve it; and when we are in the danger of the deadly epidemic, we hope the government can improve the conditions of our public health. Therefore, each question is closely related to our own lives, so it is important to allocate the money to solve it. Take the SARS epidemic as an example, why the whole world was so concerned with it and allocate a lot of money on it? It threats our lives.

Conversely, we should not neglect the long-term research that will benefit our future generations. First, the current well-being we enjoy were accumulated from generation to generation, and a large quantity of them were the fruits of our predecessors, who allocated money to launch the long-term researches without an aim to solve immediate, existing problems. The government or the groups invested money in the long-term researches with the great number scientists evolved in it only because they of the believed that those researches could benefit the humankind. Secondly, if we care little about the long-term research, we could not guard against the sudden attack by unpredictable social problems. Why we feel great fear about the SARS epidemic in 2003? It is not only because we almost know nothing about it when the first case was found, but because the ground of public health system was so shaky. Consider that if our predecessors had care much about the public health system and had allocated enough money to prop up the research of the contagious diseases, the situation today we are facing would be totally different. Either the historical retrospection or the current experience tell us that we should pay much attention to the long-term research, and every generation is living under the shades of the predecessors’ trees.

Therefore, it is an essential problem to the government or the authority to decide how to allocate the money. The finance policy can settle a nation’s future, not only on the base of its’ property left, but on the base of that whether it is a well-developed society. If a society wants to be a well-developed society with the great expectation, it should balance the two factors efficiently. Nowadays, the China government faces the same problem. The government has to take great effort and pay a tremendous quantity of money to solve the existing problems, such as the poverty of north-west, and it has to evolve in the top scientific researches to catch up with the world because the researches can help future generations even if they can not solve the current problems.

To sum up, a far-sighted society should tactfully balance the money allocation both in current use and the future benefits. Only by the reasonable distribution can the society develop in a health way and make for the prosperous future.

ymluUID: 158151

The speaker asserts that to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems is more important than to finance the long-term research, and I seriously doubt. As far as I am concerned, both the immediate questions and the long-term researches weigh the same to the development of the society. Overemphasizing either of them will lead to unpredictable damage to the society.

Firstly and fundamentally, the contemporary world we live in are important to us. We inhale the air every second and we drink the water everyday, hence, we care about every immediate, existing social problems that reduce the quality of our lives. The pollution, the security, the justice of the government, or the public health are all the focus of the modern people. When we inhale the toxic fumes we hope the government could allocate more money to purify it; when we suffer the threat of the social disorder, we hope the government could allocate more money to fight with the crimes; when the press freedom or the human right is violated, we hope the government could allocate money to improve it; and when we are in the danger of the deadly epidemic, we hope the government can improve the conditions of our public health. Therefore, each question is closely related to our own lives, so it is important to allocate the money to solve it. Take the SARS epidemic as an example, why the whole world was so concerned with it and allocate a lot of money on it? It threats our lives.

Conversely, we should not neglect the long-term research that will benefit our future generations. First, the current well-being we enjoy were accumulated from generation to generation, and a large quantity of them were the fruits of our predecessors, who allocated money to launch the long-term researches without an aim to solve immediate, existing problems. The government or the groups invested money in the long-term researches with the great number scientists evolved in it only because they of the believed that those researches could benefit the humankind. Secondly, if we care little about the long-term research, we could not guard against the sudden attack by unpredictable social problems. Why we feel great fear about the SARS epidemic in 2003? It is not only because we almost know nothing about it when the first case was found, but because the ground of public health system was so shaky. Consider that if our predecessors had care much about the public health system and had allocated enough money to prop up the research of the contagious diseases, the situation today we are facing would be totally different. Either the historical retrospection or the current experience tell us that we should pay much attention to the long-term research, and every generation is living under the shades of the predecessors’ trees.

Therefore, it is an essential problem to the government or the authority to decide how to allocate the money. The finance policy can settle a nation’s future, not only on the base of its’ property left, but on the base of that whether it is a well-developed society. (the property left 似乎也要考虑的吧，还是用other than句式吧)If a society wants to be a well-developed society with the great expectation, it should balance the two factors efficiently. Nowadays, the China government faces the same problem. The government has to take great effort and pay a tremendous quantity of money to solve the existing problems, such as the poverty of north-west, and it has to evolve in the top scientific researches to catch up with the world because the researches can help future generations even if they can not solve the current problems.(最后一句感觉不太对劲，我觉得一个long-term research 都是有一些immediate problem的解决组成)

To sum up, a far-sighted society should tactfully balance the money allocation both in current use and the future benefits. Only by the reasonable distribution can the society develop in a health way and make for the prosperous future.

发呆的小熊UID: 139071

呵呵，多谢YMLU。
能不能从结构、逻辑、观点等等方面提提意见？俺现在觉得这一块在痛苦了。

ymluUID: 158151

我把我的这个提纲铁以下吧：
Agree
A)First of all, immediate social problems need to be resolved as soon as possible to restore a sound society.
B)Moreover, the long-term researches always have their risks so that it is not reasonable to allocate most of the money for them.
C)In addition, we should be not blind to the fact that the long-term research is usually composed of a series of solution of existing problems.

个人感觉，如果是那种straddle the fence 的观点，可能需要两方面都要论述，5百多字可能两者都没说清楚，所以不如agree或者disagree，论述一点。

springyUID: 122511

先占个位子，我对这题比较感兴趣！

jianguoUID: 157933

我觉得你body1 所述例子很有气势,但我觉得你没有论证为什么我没要把这些钱分配在当前的问题上, 而且你用的都是"希望" 和实际相差很远.
个人意见

发呆的小熊UID: 139071

呵呵，谢谢楼上各位。
我可能常用骑墙式的写法吧，各打五十大板。有时候走一端的度总是不好把握。
JIANGUO：
我想论述的应该是当前的问题和人们的生活以及期望息息相关，但没有说得太清楚，唉，总是辞不达意的。展开得不够吧。以后注意。