issue90 最后冲刺，后天就考了，请大家赐砖

eaglezhouUID: 156651

90。College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than seek programs that promise entry into the job market

Should students be encouraged to pursue subjects that they are interested in? Or should they be encouraged to take some courses that promise entry into job market? According to the writer, he values the former statement more than the latter.  I agree insofar that students may learn more from subjects they are interested in and should not consider future job as only factor to decide which programs to take. However, I tend not to agree that programs can be strictly divided into two group, one of which serves students' interest while the other promise entry into job market. Neither one can say that one kind of programs are surely better than another.

It is true that focusing too much on programs which are highly specialized may potentially harm a student, in return harm the society as a whole. Cherishing the hope that a bright future is right ahead of them once they finish these program,  these students may find the consequence totally the reverse.  Lacking the enthusiasm in these subjects, they may find everyday job nothing but a daily nightmare. In addition, it is very likely that, in such a rapid developing society, what they have learned in colleges may soon out of date and the door once opened to a promising future closes. What can they do then? Can they simply go back to colleges again for other popular programs? Probably not. If the majority of students share such experience, what can the future of our society be?     

Let us turn next to these programs which can raise the interest from students.  Truly, they can learn better and be absorbed by these programs. However, case by case analysis should be used to check whether college students should be encouraged to take such programs. Some of these programs may benefit students a lot while the others may not be equally helpful to students and sometimes, even can not compare with those specialized programs.  In that case, statement that students should be encouraged to take such programs turns out to be a little bit ungrounded.

In addition, it seems that the author thinks that programs which can raise interests from students can never overlap with those promise entry into job market. Can it be possible that some programs raise the interest of students as well as promise them a better future in job market? As far as I am concerned, it is highly possible. For example, programs which are related to computer are really popular these days due to the great strides of modern society.  On the one hand, I concede that there do exist many students who step into such programs in order to make his/her future predictable. On the other hand, however, there are a large proportion of students who really have great enthusiasm towards programming, hardware and network. The reason why they learn very hard is not only because of a future job but also attributed to their great interests in knowing more about such knowledge. It is the same with students taking economics, accounting and biochemistry to name a few. Can anyone guarantee that the majority of them concern only about the job entry?     

To sum up, it is no easy job to decide whether programs, in which students are interested, or programs promise a brighter future is better. Put it another way, one can never say that one should be encouraged to take either of two kinds of program.  What should be done is to provide a wide range of programs and make some compulsory for students and leave some freedom for students to choose courses for their own interest.

jianguoUID: 157933

Should students be encouraged to pursue subjects that they are interested in? Or should they be encouraged to take some courses that promise entry into job market? According to the writer, he values the former statement more than the latter.(缺过度词) I agree insofar that students may learn more from subjects they are interested (what they interested)in and should(should用的太多了) not consider future job as only factor to decide which programs to take. However, I tend not to agree that programs can be strictly divided into two group, one of which serves students' interest while the other promise entry into job market. Neither one can say that one kind of programs are surely better than another.（有点罗嗦，希望简短一点）

It is true that focusing too much on programs which are highly specialized may potentially harm a student, in return harm the society as a whole. Cherishing the hope that a bright future is right ahead of them once they finish these（指代什么） program, these students may find the consequence totally the reverse.（不要说这么多没有论证和根据的话，举些例子） Lacking the enthusiasm in these subjects, they may find everyday job nothing but a daily nightmare. In addition, it is very likely that, in such a rapid developing society, what they have learned in colleges may soon out of date and the door once opened to a promising future closes. What can they do then? Can they simply go back to colleges again for other popular programs? Probably not. If the majority of students share such experience, what can the future of our society be? （论证不是很清楚，难懂）

Let us turn next （什么意思）to these programs which can raise the interest from students. Truly, they can learn better and be absorbed by these programs. However, case by case analysis should be used to check whether college students should be encouraged to take such programs. Some of these programs may benefit students a lot while the others may not be equally helpful to students and sometimes, even can not compare with those specialized programs. In that case, statement that students should be encouraged to take such programs turns out to be a little bit ungrounded. （首句最好把TS说出来）
你把提纲贴上来把啊，总体感觉用词怪怪的, 呵呵然后我在好好看看!
BTW 帮我看看吧,谢谢了

eaglezhouUID: 156651

programs that promise entry into the job market得不好
有interest的好
这两者并不矛盾

paisleyUID: 64183

第一感觉是有点散，但是再体会了一下呢，觉得这也是个不错的尝试。你的思路很清楚，一目了然，这是个很大的好处。语言也还比较流畅。

不过第三个论点没有论述清楚，我想你要说的是：学生感兴趣的专业也往往是对找工作有利的专业，所以这二者不能截然分开。但是你论述的时候只说“学生经常选一些对找工作有利的专业”，这一点并不能说明他们对这些专业是感兴趣的。你必须说清楚，他们首先是感兴趣，而这些又“恰好”对找工作有帮助。或者你还可以说，在新闻报道的偏重（比如对经济、娱乐方面的关注远远超过对历史、考古、文学等方面）和学生自己的耳濡目染下，学生早在上大学之前就受到一些热门工作的潜在的影响，使得他们早就对经济、娱乐业、新闻传播业等产生了兴趣，而不是对历史、考古、文学等专业产生兴趣。因此他们选的专业既是自己感兴趣的、又是为工作做了很好准备的。

希望你考完后还能帮这里的朋友改改，我过几天要请长假，没法上来帮人改了，有点放心不下，希望更多人来帮忙啊：）

eaglezhouUID: 156651

谢谢paisley的指点

eaglezhouUID: 156651

再顶一下

lxbUID: 157915

No.1 issue90 最后冲刺，后天就考了，请大家赐砖
90。College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than seek programs that promise entry into the job market

Should students be encouraged to pursue subjects that they are interested in? Or should they be encouraged to take some courses that promise entry into job market? According to the writer, he values the former statement more than the latter. I agree insofar that students may learn more from subjects they are interested in and should not consider future job as only factor to decide which programs to take. （这句话不太明白是什么意思？）However, I tend not to agree （这个用法是否正确，值得考虑一下）that programs can be strictly divided into two group（加s), one of which serves students' interest while the other promise(加s) entry into job market. Neither one can say that one kind of programs are surely better than another.
反问句开头,避免了重复题目中的意思，同时，也能够引起读者的一定兴趣。很不错的一个开端！

It is true that focusing too much on programs which are highly specialized may potentially harm a student, in return harm the society as a whole. Cherishing the hope that a bright future is right ahead of them once they finish these program(加s), these students may find the consequence totally the reverse. Lacking the enthusiasm in these subjects, they may find everyday job nothing but a daily nightmare. In addition, it is very likely that, in such a rapid developing society, what they have learned in colleges may soon out of date and the door once opened to a promising future closes. What can they do then? Can they simply go back to colleges again for other popular programs? Probably not. If the majority of students share such experience, what can the future of our society be?
该段论证了只是按照确保能够找到工作的计划培养学生。觉得把工作的范围人为的缩小了，工作在这里只是指一项技术吗？仿佛就是技工。但是工作，为了更好的生存，交际能力、礼仪等（赫赫，想得还不深入，希望可以共同探讨）

Let us turn next to these programs which can raise the interest from students. Truly, they can learn better and be absorbed by （be absorbed by 意思是：被---吞并，为----所吸收；be absorbed in 是全神贯注于，专心于；根据句子意思，似乎用in 更合适些）  these programs. However, case by case analysis should be used to check whether college students should be encouraged to take such programs. Some of these programs may benefit students a lot while the others may not be equally helpful to students and sometimes, even can not compare with those specialized programs. In that case, statement that students should be encouraged to take such programs turns out to be a little bit ungrounded.
该段论证了只是按照学生兴趣来培养学生。觉得说服力不够买，有点牵强。

In addition, it seems that the author thinks that programs which can raise interests from students can never overlap with those promise entry into job market. Can it be possible that some programs raise the interest of students as well as promise them a better future in job market? As far as I am concerned, it is highly possible. For example, programs which are related to computer are really popular these days due to the great strides of modern society. On the one hand, I concede that there do exist many students who step into such programs in order to make his/her future predictable. On the other hand, however, there are a large proportion of students who really have great enthusiasm towards programming, hardware and network. The reason why they learn very hard is not only because of a future job but also attributed to their great interests in knowing more about such knowledge. It is the same with students taking economics, accounting and biochemistry to name a few. Can anyone guarantee that the majority of them concern only about the job entry?
该段论证将两种教学计划结合起来，并用了计算机的例子作为论证，最后还推广开来，觉得很不错！

To sum up, it is no（t） (加 a )easy job to decide whether programs, in which students are interested, or programs promise a brighter future is better. Put it another way, one can never say that one should be encouraged to take either of two kinds of program. What should be done is to provide a wide range of programs and make some compulsory for students and leave some freedom for students to choose courses for their own interest.
结尾也很不错，并且提出了如何实现的做法！这点很棒！