- 最后登录
- 2019-5-15
- 在线时间
- 40 小时
- 寄托币
- 40
- 声望
- 50
- 注册时间
- 2014-12-30
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 8
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 74
- UID
- 3586028
- 声望
- 50
- 寄托币
- 40
- 注册时间
- 2014-12-30
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 8
|
6号考试,只恨没能早看到老师的作文教学。刚写的另外一篇习作ARGU22,请老师指点。
题目
ARGU22) According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students; under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year the honor code was in place, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
=============================================================
我的思路,攻击从如下几点展开
1. recent report中学校不具有代表性,都是相对差学校,学生为了及格而易作弊; GC是top学校,学生本身很好学,不需要作弊来毕业。
2. honor code实施效果:仅通过学生报告来判断。学生之间关系好,可能不报告。
3. honor code的真正影响:可能cheating下降是由电子监控普及、学校政策更严格了导致的,而非honor code;且文末提到的调查,应是新老系统对比,而非有没有新系统对比。
老师思路:
students agree not to cheat
students agree to notify faculty
replace teacher monitor- report 30 per year
21 cases under honour code
5 years later- drop to 14
survey- less likely to cheat
all colleges and universities
从老师文中提炼出的几个点
GC特例
-学业压力大小
-学生发现cheating的能力
举报的详情
-学生是否会举报同学
-是否因为总学生人数减少
===============================================================
我的习作
The author of this argument said that all colleges and universities should learn some experience from Groveton College and use the honor code system to replace previous teacher monitoring system in order to reduce the rate of cheating. While the report did show a better result in Groveton College, a number of questions about the details of the report, the applying of honor code system and the real influence of this system have to be answered to justify whether honor code system is better than teacher monitoring system.
To begin with, we need to know some details about the report. The trend of cheating is rising rapidly according to the report. However, we do not know what kind of universities was chosen for this survey. A common sense among us is that students in better universities are more hard working and are less likely to cheat in an exam, while students who do not have much talent in learning may choose to cheat in order to pass the final. So if the survey was done in some universities with ranking beyond 100, let’s say, and the Groveton College is one of the top colleges, then this result is useless. Maybe the cheating rate in top universities is decreasing among these years.
Another important question need to be answered is the exercising effect. The only way for us to get the data of cheating is other students’ notifying. However, the relationship between students are usually much sounder than that between students and teachers. It is highly possible that students would not report cheating behavior even if they knew it clearly because this kind of behavior will bring nothing but the risk of breaking the relationship with other students. Anyway, no one wants to make friends with a traitor, even if you are doing the right thing.
The last issue need to be solved is about the influence of this new system. We cannot conclude from the cheating number difference between the old system and the new one, since everything is changing these years. Something unrelated to the honor code system may play an important role in decreasing cheating number, like the development of electronic monitoring equipment and the more rigorous rules about cheating. Students are afraid of these changes instead of the new system. And what’s more, the survey of students would be less likely to cheat with an honor code is meaningless. We should compare the honor code system with the teacher monitoring one, instead of comparing it to nothing.
In conclusion, the conclusion of diffusing the honor code system to all colleges is not very sound. In order to make it more reasonable, the questions mentioned above need to be answered. (字数451)
==============================================================
老师原作
It is argued that all universities and colleges should follow the example of Groveton College to adopt an honor code in order to reduce the cases of cheating. A number of questions about the cheating cases, the reasons why fewer cases of cheating were reported and how representative Groveton is among universities have to be answered in order to decide if the recommendation and the argument are reasonable.
To begin with, we need to know more about the details of the cheating cases among Groveton students to decide if the honor code is likely to be effective. For example, we need to know if students are likely to keep their promises not to cheat during their studies given the pressure of performing well. If the students are under great pressure to do well academically, they may cheat despite their promises under the honor code. In addition, we need to know if students are more likely to detect the cases of cheating than teachers. For example, in close-book exams, maybe students can discover cheating cases of their peers around them more easily; but in paper-based assignments, teachers will detect cheating more easily with anti-plagiarism software such as Turnitin.
In addition, we also need to know why the number of reported cases of cheating was reduced after the adoption of honor code. We need more evidence about how likely students are to report their peers’ cheating cases. Maybe the students are reluctant to report the cases under peer pressure, thereby reducing the number of reported cases when the actual number of cheating cases was higher. If the decrease of reported cases is a result of the students’ reluctance to report, the honor code would actually be ineffective in deterring cheating. Another possible reason for the decline of cheating cases could be the reduction of enrolments of the college, which we need to explore with more evidence.
Finally, it is important to ask to what extent the other universities and colleges are comparable to Groveton and the honor code would be acceptable among the students and faculty members. Maybe the honor code is effective in Groveton as students there are not under great pressure to perform well or most of them are strongly motivated and well prepared for the assessments. This may not be the case for students in other universities or colleges. Moreover, for the honor code to work, both students and faculty members need to accept it as a legitimate and viable system. Groveton students and faculty may find the system acceptable but those from other universities and colleges may not.
In conclusion, we do not know whether the recommendation would be effective and whether the argument is reasonable until we can gather more information to answer the questions discussed above.
16:58
|
|