寄托天下
楼主: ClaretZ
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[备考小组] 14年秋季提纲互改小组-Issue1 [复制链接]

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
912
寄托币
6214
注册时间
2006-2-26
精华
4
帖子
2367

寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 19周年勋章

31
发表于 2014-10-26 20:32:14 |只看该作者
黑白沉默 发表于 2014-10-26 17:51
谢谢王老师修改!!!

想再向老师请教下,因为这题我的主旨句可能表达的不太明确,其实这道题我想表达 ...

想再向老师请教下,因为这题我的主旨句可能表达的不太明确,其实这道题我想表达的主旨是科技不会使人的思维能力退化,分情况讨论第一种情况是会导致思维能力上升(第一段),第二种情况是虽然会导致思维能力下降(第二段),但是这种情况随着克服懒惰是可以避免的(第三段),所以得出结论不会使思维能力退化。

老师的点评说提到懒惰有偏题的风险我觉得很有道理,根据老师这个建议,我想把第三段改成:但是这种情况是可以避免的,因为当科技发展帮我们解决了一些问题的时候,节省了我们时间,我们可以用节省下来的时间去探索方法更好的解决问题。比如wikipedia给我们提供了问题的解决方案,我们就可以尝试改进这类方法,从而还是能够不使思维能力退化。

我之前已说过
“你认为在不同的情况下,人类思考能力可能会上升或下降 这样写可以 但是 你必须具体说明在什么情况下上升 什么情况下下降”

也就是说你需要从例子中提炼一些一般性的规律  
比如你第一段的例子是汽车解决我们的日常生活交通问题 却带来了新的社会问题 比如污染、痴肥 那么你这一段的分论点就是 技术带来社会问题需要我们更多的思考

你说的信息技术带来资讯的例子 其实也可以说 资讯的overload会要求我们思考如何甄别有用的信息  包括开发出更智能的搜索引擎、更高效的数据管理系统等等  
这里的分论点可以是 当技术带给我们便利的同时 也要求我们思考如何合理利用这种便利

你的第三点其实前两段已经讲了 或许你可以再想别的方面
还有一点要考虑的是 中间只写两段也未必是坏事 写清楚了 拿4分妥妥的

举报

Rank: 4

声望
75
寄托币
494
注册时间
2013-11-18
精华
0
帖子
170

US-applicant

32
发表于 2014-10-26 21:53:07 |只看该作者
tesolchina 发表于 2014-10-26 20:32
想再向老师请教下,因为这题我的主旨句可能表达的不太明确,其实这道题我想表达的主旨是科技不会使人的思 ...

好的,太感谢老师了!!!

举报

Rank: 4

声望
72
寄托币
263
注册时间
2014-8-9
精华
0
帖子
144
33
发表于 2014-11-3 17:06:15 |只看该作者
I agree that in most general public's daily life, the convenience resulting from the high-tech today do help solve lots of tricky problems in the past, and therefore deteriorate the ability of them to think. On the other hand, for reserchers and policy makers, who also rely a lot on technology, the ability to think is more required and promoted.

TS1:Technology has brought countless convenience and solutions to thorny problems in people's daily life, which also brought the deterioration of the ability to think as a result. 人们出行依赖谷歌地图,不再依靠自己记路;人们倾向于方便快捷的网络阅读,不再像用纸质媒体时对信息进行深入思考。   

TS2:For researchers who rely on existing technology, they not only search for ways to develop the theory of science, but also the ways to meliorate the technology.考古学家基于现代科技,能比以往更好地还原化石原貌,从而探究远古时代的历史、地理和文化。对于他们来说,科技是工具,帮助他们实现缺少先进科技时所不能完成的工作。研究移动通信的工作者们基于过去的通信科技探索4G、5G,追求更快更高效的通信方式。对于他们来说,科技是基础背景和研究领域,需要他们不断地去发展。

TS3:From a politic perspective, the policy makers faced even more challenges than before, which require them conrrespondencily to think more creatively.核能的开发给世界带来了核威胁,各国统治者需要权衡利弊制定政策发展本国核能以赶上他国核武器实力,从而保全自身安全,同时又避免让他国感到自己威胁到了他们的安全,带来不必要的冲突。科技进步带来大规模工业化并因此产生环境污染,政策制定者需要思考在经济发展和环境保护间寻找平衡。这些问题都是没有科技时所不能想象的,也是非常复杂的,尽管他们可以依靠科技解决一些问题,比如有关世界各国的情报收集,随时召开跨地区的网络会议等,这些问题对政策制定者的思考能力要求仍旧很高。

自己感到有很大的不足,好像只是单纯地分了情况讨论,但没有提炼出一般性的结论。先发上来,我再思考思考,多谢老师批改~
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
tesolchina + 3 加油!

总评分: 声望 + 3   查看全部投币

举报

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
912
寄托币
6214
注册时间
2006-2-26
精华
4
帖子
2367

寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 19周年勋章

34
发表于 2014-11-3 22:47:50 |只看该作者
maoerdwn 发表于 2014-11-3 17:06
I agree that in most general public's daily life, the convenience resulting from the high-tech today ...

Issue1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.



I agree that in most general public's daily life, the convenience resulting from the high-tech today do help solve lots of tricky problems in the past, and therefore deteriorate the ability of them to think. On the other hand, for reserchers and policy makers, who also rely a lot on technology, the ability to think is more required and promoted.
整个思路挺好 将人作了分类 看得出来是认真读过我的博客
注意deteriorate这个词是不及物的
而且似乎先说researcher和policy maker 再说general public 更make sense




TS1:Technology has brought countless convenience and solutions to thorny problems in people's daily life, which also brought the deterioration of the ability to think as a result. 人们出行依赖谷歌地图,不再依靠自己记路;人们倾向于方便快捷的网络阅读,不再像用纸质媒体时对信息进行深入思考。   

不太确定你的第二个例子解决了什么问题   



TS2:For researchers who rely on existing technology, they not only search for ways to develop the theory of science, but also the ways to meliorate the technology.考古学家基于现代科技,能比以往更好地还原化石原貌,从而探究远古时代的历史、地理和文化。对于他们来说,科技是工具,帮助他们实 现缺少先进科技时所不能完成的工作。研究移动通信的工作者们基于过去的通信科技探索4G、5G,追求更快更高效的通信方式。对于他们来说,科技是基础背景 和研究领域,需要他们不断地去发展。

在你的主题句里我没有看到solve problem
注意题目说的是依赖科技解决问题而导致思想能力降低
那么你要举的例子应该是 科研人员利用某些技术解决了某些问题 然而却使他们需要更积极的思考

TS3:From a politic perspective, the policy makers faced even more challenges than before, which require them conrrespondencily to think more creatively.核能的开发给世界带来了核威胁,各国统治者需要权衡利弊制定政策发展本国核能以赶上他国核武器实力,从而保全自身安全,同时又避免 让他国感到自己威胁到了他们的安全,带来不必要的冲突。科技进步带来大规模工业化并因此产生环境污染,政策制定者需要思考在经济发展和环境保护间寻找平 衡。这些问题都是没有科技时所不能想象的,也是非常复杂的,尽管他们可以依靠科技解决一些问题,比如有关世界各国的情报收集,随时召开跨地区的网络会议 等,这些问题对政策制定者的思考能力要求仍旧很高。

同上 你需要考虑某个技术解决了一些问题却带来新的问题需要思考
比如surveilance camera 似乎为执政者解决了安保问题 却带来了隐私问题



自己感到有很大的不足,好像只是单纯地分了情况讨论,但没有提炼出一般性的结论。先发上来,我再思考思考,多谢老师批改~

感觉你的主要问题在例子的选取如何紧密切合题目上
整体框架把握得不错

举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
67
寄托币
583
注册时间
2014-9-7
精华
0
帖子
99

美版2016offer达人

35
发表于 2014-11-4 13:05:46 |只看该作者
麻烦老师了:lol
V1
TS: The statement tends to build a negative correlation between human’s dependence on technology and their ability to think. Admittedly, the normal people could abandon deeper thinking when enjoying the convenience that technology brings. However, among the beneficiary of technology, there would be researchers who make the most of their intelligence to invent new technology. Moreover, as technology is a two edge weapon sword, lots of social problems it brings require the comprehensive thinking from the whole society.

Ts1: 给普通人带来好处
Merely relying on technology to save time and energy, but never investing them into deeper thinking, some normal people could find this dependence is deteriorating their ability to think. 比如学生做题,不会的时候就求助google的搜索技术来搜索答案。这样确实能节约时间和精力,但一些学生抄完就算,没有再用省下的时间精力对知识进行更深层次的思考,这样肯定不利于思考能力。

Ts2: 给研究人员带来方便
On the contrary, the reliance on existing technology could make researchers more concentrated on exploring unknown area, which facilitates the thinking without doubt. 材料学中的testing machine配合软件可以直接测量特定材料的yielding strength, toughness等一系列关键数据。科研人员依靠这种仪器快速了解材料性质,节约的时间与精力可以用来思考如何改良材料性质和该材料的最佳用途(new tech).

Ts3: 给全社会带来问题
Furthermore, sometimes the technology provide the mankind with not only convenience, but also troubles. To eliminate or minimize these problems, human always need to conduct comprehensive thinking. 美国依靠转基因技术提高粮食产量意图解决世界的粮食短缺问题,但这同时也带来了其他社会问题。比如说基因安全问题就引发了整个社会的思考,科学界有各种研究社会人士也各有见解,这无疑加强了人们的思考能力。

哎,还是觉得没干货,例子都是假大空 - -

举报

Rank: 4

声望
72
寄托币
263
注册时间
2014-8-9
精华
0
帖子
144
36
发表于 2014-11-4 22:13:48 |只看该作者
tesolchina 发表于 2014-11-3 22:47
Issue1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to thi ...

多谢老师点评,As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.我在这个题目中抓了'rely more and more on technology', 而对 'to solve problems'没有点明,例子也就没有强调这些。看了您的点评我感到,题目中的关键词都是很重要的,以后注意~感谢! 但还是存在一些疑惑,对题目这样进行单纯的分类讨论,似乎并没有得出一般性的结论,不知该怎样处理。比如这篇,我的观点就应该是不同意题设,因为不同类人的情况不同,这样就可以了吗?感谢答疑!

举报

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
912
寄托币
6214
注册时间
2006-2-26
精华
4
帖子
2367

寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 19周年勋章

37
发表于 2014-11-5 17:09:56 |只看该作者
maoerdwn 发表于 2014-11-4 22:13
多谢老师点评,As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans  ...

你说的一般结论是指什么?
这里的观点就是对于不同的人来说这个命题可能对或者不对  
由于这篇文章是30分钟完成的短文 肯定不可能面面俱到的  
题设是什么?

举报

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
912
寄托币
6214
注册时间
2006-2-26
精华
4
帖子
2367

寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 19周年勋章

38
发表于 2014-11-10 21:02:13 |只看该作者
max940623 发表于 2014-11-4 13:05
麻烦老师了
V1
TS: The statement tends to build a negative correlation between human’s depende ...


V1
TS: The statement tends to build a negative correlation between human’s dependence on technology and their ability to think. Admittedly, the normal people could abandon deeper thinking when enjoying the convenience that technology brings. However, among the beneficiary of technology, there would be researchers who make the most of their intelligence to invent new technology. Moreover, as technology is a two edge weapon sword, lots of social problems it brings require the comprehensive thinking from the whole society.

你将humans进行分类是一个不错的做法
关于第一个点 你用的这个例子我觉得不太合适 主要是因为这是一个作弊的情况 比较特殊 用来讨论rely on tech to solve problems未必合适
或许可以讨论搜索引擎技术帮我们找到了最多人链接的网页信息 以致我们不必去甄别信息的质量  

第二point 不错 例子也很好  

第三个point你说需要全社会思考 或许改成需要policy makers思考更好一些
技术解决了一些问题 却带来新的问题 解决这些问题需要技术开发者和政策制定者更多的思考

从顺序来看
或许可以先讲第2、3个点 再用第一个点来包底  


你心目中的干货是什么样的
我感觉这些例子挺好

举报

Rank: 2

声望
52
寄托币
64
注册时间
2014-7-18
精华
0
帖子
22
39
发表于 2014-11-16 09:56:12 |只看该作者
麻烦王老师费心了
Issue1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Whether the ability of humans to think will deteriorate depends on groups of people with different attitudes to using technology, which can be summarized as three categories. For the group who don’t understand the underlying theory within the technology and the group who have acquired the basic knowledge but accept the whole outputs of the technology without questioning, applying technology will be impair their thinking ability. On the other hand, for the group who tend to question the obtained results and verify them by their knowledge and experience, using technology will only enhance their thinking ability.

For people who don’t understand the underlying theory,  they don’t have the potential ability to solve the problems by themselves and using the technology will deteriorate their potential and desire to solve problems. 举有些刚上小学的学生,总是依赖计算器去算基本运算,而他们并不真正掌握了运算法则。而长期使用计算器会减弱他们的计算能力,而基本的计算能力无论是对于学习生活都是必不可少的。

For people who accept the whole outputs of the technology without questioning, they will losing their ability to analyze gradually and eventually turn to machines for collecting data. 比如像我会用一些软件去分析建筑结构是否牢固,但我之前从不思考结果是否正确,】渐渐的发现自己对明显的结构错误都不敏感甚至看不出来了,对于结构的理解能力直线下降。

For people who acquired the relative knowledge and tend to verify the obtained results with their knowledge and experience, they will benefit from technology which is just a tool to facilitate their thinking ability. Astronomers use telescope 去帮助他们观测目力不及的天体运动,然后他们通过这些数据与理论比较,最终证明宇宙是在膨胀的,这种情况下思考能力没有受到影响。
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
tesolchina + 2 赞一个

总评分: 声望 + 2   查看全部投币

举报

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
912
寄托币
6214
注册时间
2006-2-26
精华
4
帖子
2367

寄托兑换店纪念章 US-applicant 19周年勋章

40
发表于 2014-11-18 09:31:37 |只看该作者
qinjichun 发表于 2014-11-16 09:56
麻烦王老师费心了
Issue1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability  ...


麻烦王老师费心了
Issue1、As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Whether the ability of humans to think will deteriorate depends on groups of people with different attitudes to using technology, which can be summarized as three categories. For the group who don’t understand the underlying theory within the technology and the group who have acquired the basic knowledge but accept the whole outputs of the technology without questioning, applying technology will be impair their thinking ability. On the other hand, for the group who tend to question the obtained results and verify them by their knowledge and experience, using technology will only enhance their thinking ability.

depends on 后面要跟某个自变量 比如attitude
summarized选词有问题
be impair 语法
总的来说 这个主旨句很有层次 结构很清晰 看得出来你在按照我的方法练习 加油!!!
如果有时间请写一点自己的学习体会



For people who don’t understand the underlying theory,  they don’t have the potential ability to solve the problems by themselves and using the technology will deteriorate their potential and desire to solve problems. 举有些刚上小学的学生,总是依赖计算器去算基本运算,而他们并不真正掌握了运算法则。而长期使用计算器会减弱他们的计算能力,而基本的计算能力无论是对于学习生活都是必不可少的。

deteriorate 用法
例子还不错 但是会不会有点单薄
或许可以加一个SPSS之类的统计软件 很多人不懂统计模型 之类的  



For people who accept the whole outputs of the technology without questioning, they will losing their ability to analyze gradually and eventually turn to machines for collecting data. 比如像我会用一些软件去分析建筑结构是否牢固,但我之前从不思考结果是否正确,】渐渐的发现自己对明显的结构错误都不敏感甚至看不出来了,对于结构的理解能力直线下降。

嗯 这个点不错
身边的例子就是好

For people who acquired the relative knowledge and tend to verify the obtained results with their knowledge and experience, they will benefit from technology which is just a tool to facilitate their thinking ability. Astronomers use telescope 去帮助他们观测目力不及的天体运动,然后他们通过这些数据与理论比较,最终证明宇宙是在膨胀的,这种情况下思考能力没有受到影响。


感觉你的例子不错 在提炼观点的时候要多下功夫 看怎么说更准确

For scientists and researchers who rely on technology to collect more data, the technology will challenge them and demand more siphisticated theories and methodologies to analyze and understand the data.  
或许这里不仅仅是verify the obtained results 而要强调获取数据的工具作用  

总的来说思路结构都挺好
要在语言表达方面注意 选词的话 可以考虑用语料库的方法 见我的博客
例子不错 很切题 提炼观点要加强

请你抽空私信回答一下

寄托GRE考生背景调查

以前是否考过GRE作文,分数如何?托福作文?

下次考试日期? 考前还可以写多少道题的提纲和全文?  

期待的分数?

谈谈对1+3模型的看法。

觉得自己的issue和argument最大的问题分别是什么?

对于我的指导有何期待或要求?

对于我在版面针对其他同学的批改、指导有何意见?

举报

Rank: 2

声望
53
寄托币
56
注册时间
2014-11-6
精华
0
帖子
32
41
发表于 2014-11-24 17:02:45 |只看该作者
The statement contends that the increase in reliance on technology for problem solving can deteriorate humans’ ability of independent thinking. Although technology can provide excuses for some people to avoid active thinking, the increased dependence on technology will not deteriorate the independent thinking of human beings because the humans' increasing reliance on technology facilitates active thinking and idea sharing and gives rise to new problems that requires independent thinking.
      It is reasonable to claim that technology can serve as a way to sidestep the independent thinking. Students today rely more and more on online forums to find and copy the answers to their homework and research problems. For instance, many engineering and computer science students at UC Berkeley often log on to forum including Stackoverflow and Chegg.com to search for answers to their homework assignments. With those answers, they seldom devotes themselves to independent thinking on the homework problems. Hence, it is possible that their independent thinking skills will devolve. However, those cases of students cannot represent the overall effect of technology on humans' independent thinking.
      Many evidences support the idea that technology urges the improvement of independent thinking skills of human beings by introducing new problems. The development of technology can generate unprecedented problems. For instance, the intensified application of antibiotics increased the resistance of bacteria and viruses. Therefore, the antibiotics became less and less effective. In this way, the usage of antibiotics raises the problem how people can balance the utilization of antibiotics with the enhanced resistance of bacteria and virus that those antibiotics aim to eliminate. The problem motivates humans beings to figure out the optimal dose of antibiotics and invent new medication to exterminate the bacteria and virus. Those sorts of problems prod human beings to improve their independent thinking skills.
       Moreover, technology also facilitates independent thinking of humans on aspects like science and politics with more accessible idea sharing platforms online. For instance, researchers and enthusiasts from all over the world can post interesting research questions on online scientific forums like MathOverflow. Those questions are usually do not have a single correct answer and open to any sort of constructive ideas. Hence, those questions can inspires the independent thinking of humans on science. Also, many political forums online allow citizens' ideas about the policies of the government. Debates based on independent thinking are always in process on those forums. Through the debate and expression of political ideas, citizens can improve their independent thinking on political issues.
       In conclusion, although some people can avert independent thinking with developed technology, technology have a positive impact on humans' ability of thinking for themselves by goading and promoting independent thinking with new problems and online idea sharing platforms. It is not reasonable to conclude that the increased reliance on technology can deteriorate humans' independent thinking skills.

举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
54
寄托币
231
注册时间
2013-2-18
精华
0
帖子
112
42
发表于 2014-12-10 23:27:26 |只看该作者
    TS
    The speaker claims that the abilities of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems. In reality, the abilities of human to think for themselves will never deteriorate, but significantly increase in fields such as daily life, work and scientific innovation etc.

    ts1
    In daily life, even though people could enjoy a more comfortable life with the implement of technology, but it is the help of technology that has grant people more leverage to think for themselves. 现代人们的生活无处不充有科技的成果,如手机、交通工具、甚至衣服及各种日用品,人们对其的依赖也是越来越大,但,正是有了这些科技成果,人们才得以有更多的时间去考虑自己的生活该怎么过,需要哪些东西,比如说跟好友联系一下,或回家看看父母,或陪爱人去滑雪,并且能够很方便很容易的去得到。

    ts2
    In morden work, with the implement of technology, human hands and mind have been emancipated and they would have much more time to think for new ways to improve efficiency and for themselves. 自动化设备、办公软件、机器臂等的使用,让人们在工作岗位上能够有所解脱,能够赢来一些时间来改进设备、软件来提高工作效率,同时,也能够有更多的时间来考虑自己的利益。

    ts3
    In scientific innovation, scientists stand upon the existing technology to put their energy in critical fields to further innovations. 有了超级电脑、超强软件及机器人等的使用,科学家的工作效率更提高了,同时也不用再去做重复的、无聊的计算了,能够集中精力于新的突破,并且,借助于最新的科技,科学上的突破往往都是相对以往要更容易些的,人们思索的能力倍加提升。

举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
89
寄托币
433
注册时间
2014-11-15
精华
0
帖子
82
43
发表于 2014-12-15 11:38:15 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 黛丝丝丝丝 于 2014-12-16 08:48 编辑
chrishong119 发表于 2014-12-10 23:27
TS
    The speaker claims that the abilities of humans to think for themselves will surely dete ...


我提一点个人小看法,如果不对还请Simon老师指正。

1+3 大家都熟悉了,在Opening部分最后位置就是我们下面三段的clues
我看了一下你的三个ts,我觉得与其说daily life, work and scientific innovation,不如说living standards, work efficiency 和 speed on scientific innovation. 这样更加明确。

另外就是我觉得有些语言的搭配似乎还可以更加简单一点,比如ts1的grant people more leverage能不能直接写成encourage或者其他简单的词呢?可能是我见的比较少,似乎没有读过这个表达。btw it's 'granted' not grant :P

ts1的让步成分我觉得重了点,而think for themselves展开得不够多。

如果有说错的地方~轻拍哈~
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
chrishong119 + 1 赞一个

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
54
寄托币
231
注册时间
2013-2-18
精华
0
帖子
112
44
发表于 2014-12-15 20:51:25 |只看该作者
黛丝丝丝丝 发表于 2014-12-15 11:38
我提一点个人小看法,如果不对还请Simons老师指正。

1+3 大家都熟悉了,在Opening部分最后位置就是我们 ...

三个ts的说法确实可以那样子更准确些;其实,第一段的让步我应该在让步完后加一句“这些貌似让人们为自己思考的能力降低了,但其实不然....”

举报

Rank: 4

声望
63
寄托币
908
注册时间
2014-6-9
精华
0
帖子
175

2015 US-applicant

45
发表于 2015-2-5 22:54:57 |只看该作者
TS:the definition of technology is too broad to draw such a conclusion.For instance,computer science and space technologies definitely behoove people’s critical thinking.The conclusion still can’t hold its stand even when it comes to the very controversial object ——calculators.
我的想法是对于题目的抽象词进行细化,例如technology有很多种,在computer science and space technology中都是对人的critical thinking and logic thinking要求很高,其次再对很平常的technology---calculator减少人们思考的过程提出质疑,认为计算器只能锻炼人们的耐力并不一定减少思考过程

ts1:computer science is really a technology fostering people’s logic and critical thinking.No matter how simple a software impress you,the programming behind it isn’t necessary as effortless as its seemly appearance
       even the softwares themselves reduce large quantity of work for people,it just skip the step to do the unnecessary calculation
  这一段的主题句我并没有都在第一句写完,而是在整个段落中展开,不过我感觉可能都放在第一句中会比较好。这一段主要说明的是不管一个software看起来多么简单,其背后的编程都需要非常严谨的逻辑思维。其二程序本身虽然减少工作量但是却没减少思考量,只是跳过了不必要繁琐的计算。

ts2:Not to mention the intricacy and delicacy requirements of space technology,it abet people to explore further about the origin of lives,not just human.
  这一段说明space technology引发人们对生命的本源思考,非常复杂,同时space technology要求非常精密的检查和计算,都对人们的思考能力锻炼很大

ts3:it would be very tempting to assert that calculators make people unwilling to calculate and consequently reduce the ability of thinking.Yet,it has done nothing but delete the redundancy step of calculating.
      这一段说的是尽管计算机减少了很多计算的步骤,但是人们依旧需要有一个思考的过程才能解开问题。比如说科学家在完全不用手进行任何计算的情况下发表高质量论文的现象很常见

王老师您好,这是我的第一篇issue,所以我对1+3的模型并不是很清楚,1+3中的3是不是最后有个让步,比如说在这道题中,让步可以是减弱人们的思考能力或者不减弱但是也不增强,这样可以写出更多字数?

求拍砖,狠狠的拍,拍完之后我会再从新写过一篇请老师改正

附上原文
  With the technology advancing rapidly,some people concern that the capability of human to think for themselves surely will retrograde.Nevertheless,the definition of technology is too broad to draw such a conclusion.For instance,computer science and space technologies definitely behoove people’s critical thinking.The conclusion still can’t hold its stand even when it comes to the very controversial object ——calculators.

    Instead of impairing people’s thinking abilities,computer science is really a technology fostering people’s logic and critical thinking.No matter how simple a software impress you,the programming behind it isn’t necessary as effortless as its seemly appearance.Anyone who has experience of programming will be familiar with intricate programming steps,any loophole will lead to an deadlock,therefore,on the contrary to weakening people’s capability to think,it proffer people a perfect method to reinforce logic thinking.Besides,even the softwares themselves reduce large quantity of work for people,it just skip the step to do the unnecessary calculation,its still of importance for operators to own thinking abilities to deal with vary situations.

  Not to mention the intricacy and delicacy requirements of space technology,it abet people to explore further about the origin of lives,not just human.So far,our human only control such a tiny part knowledge of this unqualified universe that we are nearly ignorant.Is there anyone who dares to say exploring the origin of lives will reduce our thinking abilities? From theory that earth is center of the universe to the heliocentral theory,from impression of square earth to the truth of spherical earth,every giant development about space technology will unimaginatively widen our eyesight and hence expand our thinking ability.We also need to pay attention to the whole process,from giant structure to tiny spike quality,so that the accuracy of operating is guaranteed.

  It would be very tempting to assert that calculators make people unwilling to calculate and consequently reduce the ability of thinking.Yet,it has done nothing but delete the redundancy step of calculating.It may be true if you deem calculation will enhance people’s patience,but the it isn’t inevitable to be involved with the process of thinking.it’s not an unusual phenomenon that scientist publish high qualities paper without do a single calculation by hand.It could be realized all by machine.On the contrary to increasing people’s thinking ability,it,instead,waste people’s precious time to do something more significant which is called opportunity cost.

  Ultimately,it’s very clear that lots of technologies are and will be improving our life quality and reinforce our thinking ability simultaneously.

举报

RE: 14年秋季提纲互改小组-Issue1 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
14年秋季提纲互改小组-Issue1
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1778354-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
进群抱团
25fall申请群
微信扫码
小程序
寄托留学租房小程序
微信扫码
寄托Offer榜
微信扫码
公众号
寄托天下
微信扫码
服务号
寄托天下服务号
微信扫码
申请遇疑问可联系
寄托院校君
发帖
提问
报Offer
写总结
写面经
发起
投票
回顶部