- 最后登录
- 2025-4-28
- 在线时间
- 26346 小时
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 声望
- 730
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 4548
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 14374
- UID
- 3505689
  
- 声望
- 730
- 寄托币
- 8632
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4548
|
发表于 2014-11-28 18:13:26
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 cheesechan 于 2014-11-29 01:00 编辑
Joanna彦小明 发表于 2014-11-28 17:11 
谢谢谢谢,很诚恳的建议!投行的业务分很多种,可是楼主现在做的业务自己不是很喜欢。考虑到时间是有限的 ...
[no chinese keyboard]
1. can you just simply try to switch to the division you like? it seems not that common that a master level knowledge is needed in IB, even research, unless you are on the macro/quant side, which need a really solid master/PhD. It sounds to me that you need the reputation of the school more that the content inside, at which working experience maybe a more useful tool for switching, even not in the "right" division
2. except MIT, no top / 1st tier business school provide MSF in US. especially for someont like OP with some CFA already (and a fina bachelor), having a MSF in US is completely waste of time and money. MBA is the most common way of further study in business in US at the end. i will agree a US MSF is not a solution for OP.
3. econ is nothing much better indeed if one dont plan to go academic. True that some famous school in US (Columbia, NYU, Duke, Michigan) offer a MA in econ (and thus better than MSF for US), but dont expect the content inside will be practical, just the analytial traiing, and most importantly the reputation of the school.
academically, it is a much better to supplment finance by XYZ + CFA than MSF + CFA, but XYZ = econ theory definitly rank behind quantitaitve skill, and also behind law, account...
having a MBA / post-experience Master in Finance didn't help in this sense, but rather more on exposure and networking side as one will learn much more with experienced professionals rather than fresh graduate as classmate.
4. I will suggest OP to consider one or two year later some one-year post expereicne master in finance (also waste of time in content but you will have the name of the school, and network) like LBS, Cambridge, or consider a one year MBA so that the cost is lower. (e.g. oxford, .....)
(p.s. i guess leaving 2016 with 2 year w.e. is a good timing, unless for MBA, which may need 1 more year somehow in general; and main cost for study is not only tuition, but also the opp cost: lost w.e. and income)
5. if OP stick to stick to the plan of studying right now (with one year of working experience), in addition to US, i think some UK program will be of your choice too, like Oxford MFE, LSE MSc Fina / Fina & econ, but they do count more on GPA
6. career choice is quite rather a life-long decision.....not sure if you plan to stay in home after marriage/having children, but if yes, think twice before studying: master education is a investment on human capital, and the return can only be realized if one really really work to earn. if no, staying in a "wrong" division for one or two year more is nothing.
7. I guess HKU MFin is not really a choice for you also......first half is CFA, second half is financial engineering.....given you have finance bachelor + CFA + working experiecne in financial industry, you dont need the first, and you dont want the second part......except the name again of course.
8. dont think the location is important for your case, but only the industry reputation back china is. location is super important, especially for non-target univeristy, when one want to find a job at where on study. As long as you state that you plan to back after study, and dont have funding for 2 year program like MBA (and thus no time slot for summer intern), the location is something really doesn't matter too much, except about living experience and condition. (and given if you only try to apply really top one (say top 15 in US), the location is, but not the major/only concern, e.g. cornell, michigan....) |
|