- 最后登录
- 2015-4-8
- 在线时间
- 113 小时
- 寄托币
- 433
- 声望
- 89
- 注册时间
- 2014-11-15
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 82
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 308
- UID
- 3576832
- 声望
- 89
- 寄托币
- 433
- 注册时间
- 2014-11-15
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 82
|
本帖最后由 黛丝丝丝丝 于 2014-12-13 00:04 编辑
建议写完然后对照Simon的范文段落再看这贴
因为此楼严重剧透,慎入。。。
感谢Simon老师实时辅导,根据提纲,我们同时写了三个段落,以下是对比和分析:
Paragraph 1.Is the decline in audience size the main reason why the profit has decreased?
- maybe the ticket price was too low
- maybe the advertising is too expensive
- maybe the actors and actresses or directors are overpaid
Daisy:
To begin with, more information is needed to respond to the question that whether decline in audience is the main reason of decreased profits. We should take both the incomes and expense into consideration. On the one side, was tickets of Classical Shakespeare sold in past ten years of too low prices leading to an incoming that cannot cover the operating fee? On the other side, did the budget used wisely? Fee of advertising might account for too large proportion of the total, or salaries for actors and actresses were unaffordable comparing to the incomes. If there was any inappropriate financial operation, profits would decline as well despite of the fluctuates on audience size.
Simon:
The first question we need to investigate is whether the significant decrease in profit is mainly a result of the reduction in audience size. There could be a number of other factors that may affect the profits of the company. For example, maybe the pricing strategy is not optimal and the prices were set at a level that is too low to make any profits. Or the company has spent too much money on advertising, thereby eating away the profits. Another possible reason for low profits is that the employees (actors, actresses and the director) may be overpaid. If it turns out that these are the main reason why the company is not profitable, the company should then focus its efforts to address these issues instead of trying to attract new audience.
同样的提纲下,两个段落主要差距在语言运用的自然程度,以及整个段落的起承转合。
针对question类的题目要求,除了用answer question这一较为僵硬的表达外,还可以用address或者deal with。
在这段中Simon用了The first question we need to investigate, 值得学习。
另外整个段落结构是,TS句指出问题,下一句说有多重可能/原因,再举三例,最后再总结如果三例中任何一例成立,则原结论不成立。注意TS与例子之间那句的衔接(题外话:今天到“外面的世界”看了一下,不管是原任职评分老师还是拿了6分的学生,一律都说文章长度对分数来说很重要啊。。。),第二句的承接,和最后一句的总结,都是非常重要的。
2. Did the "Free Plays" program really cause the increase in profits of AR company
-maybe the company has hired some more attractive/popular cast
- maybe the company has marketed their plays more successfully
- maybe the plays in the program were particularly popular (but has nothing to do with the program
Daisy: The second question we need to investigate is whether the increasing of profits in AR company is primarily due to starting ‘Free Plays’ program. There could be several other factors that may enhance the profits. For example, AR might hire groups of sophisticated cast to attract audience. Or after executing marketing survey and interview on prospective audience, they had found the pinpoint of their target. It is also possible that one particular play held in that program was successfully popular while other plays sold few tickets, thus the program is less likely to be evaluated as a good example.
Simon:Before making any decision to follow the example of AR, we need to ask if the "free Plays in the park" program really helped AR to increase profits. While introducing the new program, the company may have taken other measures to boost its profits. For example, it may have hired some new actors/actresses that help attract more audience. Or it may have marketed its plays more effectively with an inexpensive advertising agent. And maybe the company has featured some really popular plays that has nothing to do with the park. If these are the real reasons why the profit has increased, then simply introducing a similar program in the park would not achieve similar results.
依旧注意起承转合。
3. Can Shakespeare Theatre really replicate the AR's success
- maybe plays by Shakespeare are no longer popular
- maybe the plays are not suitable for a stage in a park (acoustics not good enough)
- maybe the target audience are not interested in watching a play in the park (different from the audience of AR)
Daisy: Before making any decision on replicating the AR’s success, we need to ask if this emulation will work out for CS theatre. If CS hastily introduce this SP Park program, results may vary due to time flows and nature of public catholic taste. For example, plays by Shakespeare may defined outdated by the public attracting few people to join in. Or Shakespeare’ works are too serious to perform on a stage in park. The target audience of CS, differing with those of AR, might not interested in appreciating plays in the park. Therefore further consideration is required to evaluate how much we can learn from AR.
Simon:Even if the program has indeed increased the profits of AR, we still need to ask whether the Shakespeare Theatre can replicate its success. We need to keep in mind that AR can offer a much wider variety of plays than the plays by Shakespeare. If the program in the park was successful due to the variety of the plays and the plays by Shakespeare are no longer attractive, it would be difficult for the ST company to achieve similar success. In addition, we need to know if the Shakespearean plays are suitable for the stage in a park. Maybe the plays need certain aspects of the setting that make it inappropriate to perform in a park. Finally, we need to investigate the tastes and preferences of the target audience of ST company. If they do not like the idea of watching a play in a park, this move will not be very helpful.
今天的感受是对提纲的作用更加明晰了,如果时间允许,写提纲时应将分论点也列出来,这样对指导全文写作才有实际意义。
如果考场上时间不够,那么在脑海中规划时,也应考虑到每一段的确切内容,而不是“喔我就分ABC三个点来写”这样模糊的计划。
有了明确的结构之后,在写文章时,务必注意起承转合来响应文章的要求。基本结构是TS-过渡句-具体可能性/例子-总结。
这样的练习感觉还是挺有收获的。今天新想法是:根据比较成熟的提纲先练习段落写法,练习若干后再自己尝试拟提纲,这样对提纲需要如何拟才会有把握。这个想法供参考,自己是没时间练习啦。
|
|