Issue51 机井椰树，教育应当满足每个学生需求

needleUID: 158900

暂时没有任何模版中……

不过这的确是一个很像模版的开头……:PPP
这个角度比较容易切入……

精力旺盛？唉！！

lovebrianUID: 157127

Issue51:
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

提纲：
1．不同意
2．目的确定方法，education的目的在于培养社会有用人才
3．基于目的，education应该满足大多数人共同的需要（社会的需要）已经形成了自己的风格了！！Excellent！
4．灵活变通也是必不可少的
5．总结

There is a controversial justification about education that it will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, which is somewhat popular nowadays.开头也形成了风格！Good！ However, as far as I am concerned这个用法我两篇考试都用了 :D , I do not agree with this point of view. Only 是不是少个词儿？education satisfies the requirements of students as a whole, can it be regarded as successful.

Primarily, as a common sense, the method should be determined by the purpose. 前后链接漂亮啊~~ 后面这个很好的transitionWhat is that of education? In my opinion, education is to teach people not only the techniques but also moral norms, by doing which, the kind of useful people needed by the society are cultivated. An education process is equal to a revolution or a modification appearing in a person's mind. Namely, being educated, students should have learned enough skills to make living and established their wholesome world outlook and sound habits before they enter the society as mature adults. It is the chief purpose of education.外围阿~~~~~~~//pad :D

So since education's goal is put on the cultivation of useful persons for the future society, it is easy to say that it should not focus on meeting the individual needs of each student because of following reasons. From one aspect, the society itself has common standards and requirements on people, for example, to be honest and to be kind. Also, the skills that students should learn to master as eligible social members in the future, enjoy plenty of similarities between themselves required by different positions and vocations. Education should obey the basic law of society so that it should choose a general way to teach students all necessary knowledge. What is more, students, most of which are adolescents, are well likely to be lack of well-rounded consideration, so it is nothing but irresponsible to satisfy their naive needs. To teach students only what they are interested in? does not seems to be but is obviously ridiculous. For instance, under the situation that the ability to read and write is necessity to everybody today, how could education system meet a student's interest to avoid learning the alphabet though he/she really feels boring? Education assumes the responsibility to try its best to cultivate students perfectly.看上去就是在说理，说理，可是竟然觉得很顺，不错呢！！层次也很好。但我觉得那个例子不合适，就是读写能力的那个~~不是很能搭配题目中的individual needs~~

However, such a point does not stand for an advocacy of petrified education style. Flexibility is necessary and inevitable. As the distinctions are concerned, besides the essential common courses applied to them, students have rights to call for a content towards their own needs individually. Some auxiliary lessons should be offered to meet different interests, for example, schools should make it possible for those with interest in painting by setting such a class. Also, student's personalities should not be ignored under a united education. Outgoing students and those with excessive shyness should be treated in distinctive ways. A slight blame on the former perhaps means nothing but on the latter might be a deep hurt and leaves a long-lasting adverse impact on their psychology. What is more, the natural conditions surely desire different education methods to reach the same point. Those somewhat below the average of mental power may need more patience and directions, compared with those geniuses who are conducted in a less time-consuming way. In brief, under the premise of the satisfaction to the foundational requests of the students, education styles to meet individuals’ proper needs and interests of each student should be taken into account and exerted as best as we can.汗一个，看了两遍，提不出问题来！

In sum, to meet the needs and interests of each student is not the mere condition for education to be effective. What is much more significant in this case is to content the students wholly as required by the reality. Individual needs and interests are important either, however, to make the education’s goal into reality, what we only can do is set them behind. （638）


dezhi工具模考，稍稍超时（不到10分钟）弓虽！，算是进步：）

请拍吧！~~~

看得出形成了自己独具特色的写作风格~~
而且已经很顺手了吧？嘿嘿~~很强了！！深度很不错~~
而且思路清晰~~~~都提不出毛病来了~~~~~

说点别的：我的句号后面空两格

还有~~长句感觉比以前多了~~~有点冗长~~

赞一个~~
姐姐好好加油！ :D

needleUID: 158900

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B][quote]
3．基于目的，education应该满足大多数人共同的需要（社会的需要）已经形成了自己的风格了！！Excellent！[/B]

:PPP
我要是傻傻地问一句啥风格会不会挨西红柿啊？Maybe我老是把问题写的比较大……佯装深刻的样子……

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B][quote]
There is a controversial justification about education that it will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, which is somewhat popular nowadays.开头也形成了风格！Good！ However, as far as I am concerned这个用法我两篇考试都用了  , I do not agree with this point of view. Only 是不是少个词儿？education satisfies the requirements of students as a whole, can it be regarded as successful.[/B]

又来了……风格……汗ing
Only后面的when哪去了？真粗心啊！

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B][quote]外围阿~~~~~~~//pad [/B]

你果然这么说，和我猜的一样……不过大家说有跑题嫌疑

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B][quote]看上去就是在说理，说理，可是竟然觉得很顺，不错呢！！层次也很好。但我觉得那个例子不合适，就是读写能力的那个~~不是很能搭配题目中的individual needs~~[/B]

例子可能太简单了？我是从基本技能这个角度考虑的……读写能力是social reqirement，feel boring才是individual interest

最初由 lovebrian 发布
[B]看得出形成了自己独具特色的写作风格~~
而且已经很顺手了吧？嘿嘿~~很强了！！深度很不错~~
而且思路清晰~~~~都提不出毛病来了~~~~~

说点别的：我的句号后面空两格

还有~~长句感觉比以前多了~~~有点冗长~~

赞一个~~
姐姐好好加油！  
[quote][/B]

谢谢狒狒！！！感觉大家给这一篇的评价让我激动的不得了，因为毕竟是我最接近限时的一次！有点信心了！！！

fishergirlUID: 152325

needle应该对自己充满信心啊，你写的很不错的！！！

LSDUID: 157855

Issue51:
Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

提纲：
1．不同意
2．目的确定方法，education的目的在于培养社会有用人才
3．基于目的，education应该满足大多数人共同的需要（社会的需要）
4．灵活变通也是必不可少的
5．总结

There is a controversial justification about education that it will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, which is somewhat popular nowadays. However, as far as I am concerned, I do not agree with this point of view. Only education satisfies the requirements of students as a whole, can it be regarded as successful.

Primarily, as a common sense, the method should be determined by the purpose. What is that of education? In my opinion, education is to teach people not only the techniques but also moral norms, by doing which; the kind of（ useful ）people needed by the society are cultivated. An education process is equal to a revolution or a modification appearing in a person's mind. Namely, being educated, students should have learned enough skills to make living and established their wholesome world outlook and sound habits before they enter the society as mature adults. It is the chief purpose of education.
教育对人才的作用，教育的真正目的并不是为了迎合每个人的需要，而是造就社会需要的人才。不错：）[要学习needle姐姐每段结尾照应TS]

So since（这里用了俩个连词，是不是有点多余？） education's goal is（to） put on（这个词组用在这儿什么意思啊？put on 的意思：穿上, 把...放在上, 装出, 假装, 增加, 欺骗, 添上, 使靠...维持生命） the cultivation of useful persons for the future society, it is easy(???褒义，贬义？请指教) to say that it should not focus on meeting the individual needs（need 吧） of each student because of following reasons. From one aspect, the society itself has common standards and requirements on people, for example, to be honest and to be kind. Also, the skills that students should learn to master as eligible social members in the future, enjoy plenty of similarities between themselves required by different positions and vocations. Education should obey the basic law of society so that it should choose a general way to teach students all necessary knowledge. What is more（对应上面的from one aspect?有这种用法吗？请指教）, students, most of which（whom） are adolescents, are well likely to be lack of well-round consideration, so it is nothing but irresponsible to satisfy their naive needs. To teach students only what they are interested does not seems to be but is obviously ridiculous. For instance, （under the situation that）the ability to read and write is necessity to everybody today, how could education system meet a student's interest to avoid learning the alphabet though he/she really feels boring? Education assumes the responsibility to try its best to cultivate students perfectly.
论证教育应该满足大多数人的需要，而不是每个学生。（个人认为后一点还可以再举些例子，用排比，可增加说服力）

However, such a point does not stand for an advocacy of petrified education style（用system是否要好些？）. Flexibility is necessary and inevitable. As the distinctions are concerned, besides the essential common courses applied to them, students have rights to call for a content towards their own needs individually. Some auxiliary lessons should be offered to meet different interests, for example, schools should make it possible for those with interest in painting by setting such a class. Also, student's personalities should not be ignored under a united（？？） education. Outgoing（外向用这个词吗？请指教） students and those with excessive shyness should be treated in distinctive ways. A slight blame on the former perhaps means nothing but on the latter might be a deep hurt and leaves a long-lasting adverse impact on their psychology（这个例子个人认为和主题关系不是很密切阿）. What is more, the natural conditions surely desire different education methods to reach the same point. Those somewhat below the average of mental power may need more patience and directions, compared with those geniuses who are conducted in a less time-consuming way. In brief, under the premise of the satisfaction to the foundational requests of the students, education styles to meet individuals’ proper needs and interests of each student should be taken into account and exerted as best as we can.
感觉这段没有上两段的论证好

In sum, to meet the needs and interests of each student is not the mere condition for education to be effective. What is much more significant in this case is to content the students wholly as required by the reality. Individual needs and interests are important either, however, to make the education’s goal into reality, what we only can do is set them behind. （638）

整篇文章给人感觉很不错，比较有层次感，只是第四段希望搂主再思考一下

欢迎NEEDLE指点我的文章.:p

needleUID: 158900

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]So since（这里用了俩个连词，是不是有点多余？） education's goal is（to） put on（这个词组用在这儿什么意思啊？put on 的意思：穿上, 把...放在上, 装出, 假装, 增加, 欺骗, 添上, 使靠...维持生命） the cultivation of useful persons for the future society, it is easy(???褒义，贬义？请指教) to say that it should not focus on meeting the individual needs（need 吧） of each student because of following reasons.[/B]

So是连接两段的。since是该句中的连词。

... goal is put on...这里不是the goal to do...的用法，就是简单的被动语态。put on，取“放在……之上”的意思。那么多意思我好像只会用基本的这个。

easy是褒义啊！needs在这里是n.复数

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]What is more（对应上面的from one aspect?有这种用法吗？请指教）,[/B]

这个，汗ing...不知道。就是个人觉得from on aspect,from another aspect很烦。也许用错了？我不知道。//shy

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]However, such a point does not stand for an advocacy of petrified education style（用system是否要好些？）[/B]

一样，意义有不同。但我后面写的主要是不同的教育方式，所以前面用style更贴切

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]Also, student's personalities should not be ignored under a united（？？） education. Outgoing（外向用这个词吗？请指教） students and those with excessive shyness should be treated in distinctive ways.[/B]

united一致的。不过我看了看，感觉不是很好，还是用单一的比较好unitary
outgoing可以表示直率的，性格开朗的，友善的，好交际的……总之是类似的意思

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]A slight blame on the former perhaps means nothing but on the latter might be a deep hurt and leaves a long-lasting adverse impact on their psychology（这个例子个人认为和主题关系不是很密切阿）.[/B]

这个……你不认为不同的personality暗指了不同的needs吗？

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]感觉这段没有上两段的论证好[/B]

:PPP :)

最初由 LSD 发布
[B]整篇文章给人感觉很不错，比较有层次感，只是第四段希望搂主再思考一下

欢迎NEEDLE指点我的文章.
[/B]

body3，也就是你说的第4段其实我自己是很喜欢的//shy
不过见仁见智，西西

我会抽时间看的。题库看了还没有三分之一，正在着急……

谢谢LSD点评

LSDUID: 157855

不用急，个人认为题库中有些题是凑数的，不用细想了。
可以看看老题库和机井
姐姐文章写得好
羡慕~~~