寄托天下
查看: 1356|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue69 欢迎大家砸砖 必回拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
1735
注册时间
2004-12-13
精华
0
帖子
1
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-2-14 18:11:14 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
题目"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development

Nowadays, science is more and more significant for its great contribution to our society.  Everyone knows that today’ high living stander benefits much from the science research. See the three technology revolution, every time it makes great improvement on our living level. But here there is another problem related with it, that is how the government should do with it, whether place few, if any, restriction on scientific research or put it under strict regulation. As far as I am concerned, a balance should be hit concerning how many governmental regulations are proper for scientific research and development.
  It is the scientific research make the society progress. Without them
  Too much restriction will only thwart the progress of scientific research. Firstly, the government can not decide which kinds of research should take place and which kinds should not, indeed, no one know it. We can not stop a research just because it may be not helpful to us. It is quite possible that it make great improvement on our living level. Take Einstein’ relativism as example, when it published, nobody could understand it and all the people believed that grant is right, it has no use at all. Today, it is commonly used in physics research as a basic theory. It also makes us know the great power in the nucleus. Now nuclear power stations make a important role in the electricity produce industry and it will become even more important in the future. How did anybody know its endless pragmatism when Einstein did his research? Furthermore, Common sense tells us that scientific research is a creative work, and the most important things for it are imagine and the courage to adventure. Therefore, too much regulation must stymie the scientific research procedure. Beside, nobody likes doing everything under other’s regulation. This may hurt the motivity of the researchers, then do harm for the scientific research. To sum up, the government should place as few restrictions as possible.
  However, without regulation, problems will appear in many aspects. Although we can not know which thing is useful in the future well, we can see which thing is intend to endanger human beings clearly. Some people put their personal benefits on the first place, they want to earn money at any costs such as environment, the others’ benefits and so on. If the government let this trend go, lots of problems will appear. Meanwhile, we should be aware of some extremists and terrorists. Their research will do harm for the whole human being if the government have no restriction on them. Besides, more caution should be paid to controversial problems that are concerned with ethic and genetic issues such as the clone of human being. These kinds of research will not do ham for the human being or at least their bad aspects are not patent, but they will arise numerous ethic and genetic debates which may make our society become unsteady. So proper regulations should be placed on them.
  In conclusion, when we realize the need of proper restriction on scientific research, we should also be aware of the potential detriment caused by the too much regulations. We must set up a balance of them.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
1441
注册时间
2004-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2005-2-14 18:34:27 |只看该作者
占座,楼主下次注意分段啊~第一眼看着有点晕
向往天空的颜色
听见花开的声音
闻见幸福的味道
体会快乐的感觉

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
1441
注册时间
2004-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2005-2-14 18:55:15 |只看该作者
Nowadays, science is more and more significant for its great contribution to our society. Everyone knows that today’ high living [U]stander [/U]  benefits much from the science research. See the three technology revolution, every time it makes great improvement on our living level. But here there is another problem related with it, that is how the government should do with it, whether place few, if any, restriction on scientific research or put it under strict regulation.[U] As far as I am concerned, a balance should be hit concerning how many governmental regulations are proper for scientific research and development.[/U] 看不懂

It is the scientific research [U]make[/U] that makes the society progress. [U]Without them
Too [/U]  much restriction will only thwart the progress of scientific research. Firstly, the government can not decide which kinds of research should [U]take place[/U] 能这样用?怎么觉得那么别扭 and which kinds should not, indeed, [U]no one know it. [/U]  俩句子中间没连词We can not stop是停止?还是阻止prevent? a research just because it may be not helpful to us. It is quite possible that it make great improvement on our living level. Take Einstein’ relativism as example, when it published, nobody could understand it and all the people believed that grant is right, it has no use at all. Today, it is commonly used in physics research as a basic theory. It also makes us know the great power in the nucleus. Now nuclear power stations make [U]a[/U]  important role in the electricity produce industry and it will become even more important in the future. How did anybody know its endless pragmatism when Einstein did his research? Furthermore, Common sense tells us that scientific research is a creative work, and the most important things for it are [U]imagine [/U] imagination and the courage to adventure. Therefore, too much regulation must stymie the scientific research procedure. Besides, nobody likes doing everything under other’s regulation. This may hurt the motivity of the researchers, then do harm [U]for [/U]to  the scientific research. To sum up, the government should place as few restrictions as possible.

However, without regulation, problems will appear in many aspects. Although we can not know which thing is useful in the future well, we can see which thing is intend to endanger human beings clearly. Some people put their personal benefits on the first place, they want to earn money at any costs such as environment, the others’ benefits and so on. If the government let this trend go, lots of problems will appear. Meanwhile, we should be aware of some extremists and terrorists. Their research will do harm [U]for[/U]  the whole human being if the government have no restriction on them. Besides, more caution should be paid to controversial problems that are concerned with ethic and genetic issues such as the clone of human being. These kinds of research will not do ham [U]for [/U]  the human being or at least their bad aspects are not patent, but they will [U]arise [/U] 不及物 numerous ethic and genetic debates which may make our society become unsteady. So proper regulations should be placed on them.有争议的课题,就很难判断了,如果定标准怎么定呢?貌似跟上段有点矛盾

In conclusion, when we realize the need of proper restriction on scientific research, we should also be aware of the potential detriment caused by the [U]too much [/U]excessive  regulations. We must set up a balance [U]of [/U]between  them.

错误好多啊,不过论证方面还是挺流畅的,语言上再努力一下~
向往天空的颜色
听见花开的声音
闻见幸福的味道
体会快乐的感觉

使用道具 举报

RE: issue69 欢迎大家砸砖 必回拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue69 欢迎大家砸砖 必回拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-247743-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部