[问题]argument16 我这个驳斥点成立吗？ 谢谢~

梅子UID: 195023

题目
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper from a citizen of the state of Impecunia.
'Two years ago our neighboring state, Lucria, began a state lottery to supplement tax revenues for education and public health. Today, Lucria spends more per pupil than we do, and Lucria's public health program treats far more people than our state's program does. If we were to establish a state lottery like the one in Lucria, the profits could be used to improve our educational system and public health program. The new lottery would doubtless be successful, because a survey conducted in our capital city concludes that citizens of Impecunia already spend an average of $50 per person per year on gambling.'

其中，请问对per pupil 中的 pupil 一次怎么理解？
我写提纲时，第一个反应是evidence不全面，只说了小学生，没有说中学生，大学生等的情况。
可后来发现金山词霸里的pupil有学生/小学生两种解释，再查webster,好像还是最好理解为小学生。不知道这一点能不能这样驳？
请问大家的意见，或者你们对这一点是如何驳斥的？？

先谢了~~

lotoUID: 194809

1．        迷惑的比较 时间上比较结果不全，two years ago ，lucria和Impecunia 比较起来是什么情况？ Lucria 在 began a state lottery 后 和 Lucria 在 began a state lottery 前 比较起来是什么情况2．        以偏概全 偏 = a survey conducted in our capital city 全 = the state of Impecunia3．        偷换概念 概念A = lottery 概念B = gambling

lotoUID: 194809

pupil这一点上只是次要攻击即可

梅子UID: 195023

嗯，调查的范围 和 偷换概念
我没有想到，好，谢拉-