- 最后登录
- 2018-10-11
- 在线时间
- 234 小时
- 寄托币
- 26670
- 声望
- 26
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-19
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 34
- 精华
- 15
- 积分
- 9068
- UID
- 158842
  
- 声望
- 26
- 寄托币
- 26670
- 注册时间
- 2004-3-19
- 精华
- 15
- 帖子
- 34
|
Issue154 Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators。
When people mention about education, most of them firstly think of a group of professional educators in the schools. However, in fact, [leave one of them] in the process of education, the human being can not separate->be separated from the family and->or community. In my opinion, like issue mentioned, the family education and society education should be responsible for cultivating [delete 'a'] well- rounded students, because education is too important to leave solely to school education.
First of all, the clear functions of these three education’s aspects, on my view, are necessary for us to start a full discussion. The first one is school education, which can bring abundant and up-to- date knowledge, valuable experience on studying and searching, and ideal circumstances for learning to [to??] the students by the professional educators. The second one is the family education. As parents and families, they teach us in the highest priority. From their [why using 'we' here and 'they' there? ]parents, people can learn existentexisted experience and knowledge about how to communicate with others, how to usecontrol their emotions, and how to live in the practical society. The third one is the society or community education, in which students can accumulate and study the social knowledge as well as social experience with the practical way. Therefore, because of different functions and responsibilities of school education, family education and society education on the way to being the well-rounded human being [who says the final destination of education is to turn people well-rounded persons?], they are all indispensable and even influence withon each other.
As the family education??, it is the starting point of people understanding knowledge and society, as well as forming their personalities, their own moral system and ethical standards. For example, before we enter into the primary school, they [who are 'they'?] teach us some simple mathematics and literal skills in order to [in order to? why? I do not think so. I think that is just for ordinary communication in daily lives not for some kind of 'learning in the future'. ] make us prepare very well[not always very well.] for learning in the future. When we begin our studying or begin [do not use begin twice in one sentence.] to touch the society, they [again, who are 'they'? ]always educate us that for the happiness in the future, we should study hard and work hard [why will hard working bring happiness? happiness is a complicated concept.]; for being favored by others, we should be modest, friendly, kind and selfless [this seems to be in the society education]; for being respected by most people, we should be loyal on what we believe in, be honest on what we have done, and be just and rational on what we judge [seems not to belong to family education]. In fact, only can the parents teach their children those details of the experience and moral system carefully. [People could learn from others like friends or ... Not always parents.] The teachers in the school can not teach every student those details. Thus, the family education is necessary and elementary for every person to form their own thoughts and moral standards. have you discussed about thoughts or moral standars in this body?
As the society education, as we know, society is the place, in which people mostly study and accumulate their knowledge and experience through their frustration and their failures. But it is not like family education, by which students [you'd better say 'people' in a society and say 'students' at school, right?] can absorb the wealth of the knowledge and experience from their parents unlimitedly without any frustration and failure. However, there is no doubt that only can the society provide students enough room to carry out and pursue their dreams and their ambitions. Meanwhile, by the community education, not only can the students learn more social knowledge and social experience which can not be educated in the school, but they also can form their special value orientations, value inclination. Meanwhile [please do not use 'meanwhile' continuously], they also finally determine what their developing goals and fields are. Therefore, through society education, the person can become a real and useful human being for society, because they actually have their own spirits and souls on their lives and their careers. 感觉这段话说得绕口且笼统,试深入些
In addition, those three aspects do not function respectively; on the contrary, they are influenced with each other. The family education can be considered the primary step, which is the base of other two educations, because it can enlighten the students to primarily realize the schools and society. Then, the school education begins to educate students the well-ordered and valuable knowledge, theories as well as methods for dealing with problems. Finally, students will carry on the taught details by the teachers and family in the society to fulfill them. Thus, experiencing such process, the students can completely and really improve.
In conclusion, the school education, family education and society education are all important for well educating a student. Those three aspects impact [impact on] with each other. And the comprehensive education is conducted by combining with three aspects properly and continuously.
个人感觉楼主说了好多罗嗦的话,句子写得不精练,我觉得太多的连词,太多插入语,会影响文章的力度,显得很多地方可有可无
呵呵 |
|