issue87 [color=#00ecff]高频

ayrieUID: 128476

Issue87  ------摘要------
作者：ayrie     共用时间：43分7秒     480words
从2005年2月11日19时49分到2005年2月11日20时43分
------题目------
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.
------正文------

I agree with the speaker's assertion that in any field of inquiry, such as the creation of arts, the breakthrough of science, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.

In the field of arts, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries because beginner is easily be more creative than the well-trained expert. The function of arts is upset, so the ability of creation is the soul of any important discoveries in this field. For example, the drawing method of dark-contrast is an important discovery in the history of portrait. Robin Green was considered to be a beginner because he had not been trained with any formal drawing lessons. However, Robin abolished the traditional method, and he tried to create a more "natural" and more "shaping" portrait-drawing method. And then he successfully fined the inspiration from his dark bedroom and invented the dark-contrast method. The experts of Robin's time could not easily make such critical discovery because they were trained to be a skillful master, not a adventurer. Therefore, in the field of arts, the beginner is more likely than the expert to inquire important discoveries.

The speaker’s assertion is rational to some extent in the field of science, as well. In any field of science, such as physics, chemistry, biology, or even mathematics, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, for the reason that whichever advancement of science needs critical thinking and creation, while the expert is less apt to make irregular and even incorrect action than the beginner. For instance, the discovery of DNA double-helix structure was made by two young scientists, though this discovery was consider to be a milestone of molecular biology, it is surprising that none of the two scientist were majored in that field, therefore they were beginner of that field. As Watson, one the scientist once said (and I paraphrased): “After I awarded the Noble Prize, many people had asked me that why am I, as a physics doctor and a beginner in biology, could make such a significant discovery. The reason is simple but paradox, just because I am a beginner in biology, I dare to use irregular method that other biological experts did not ever imagine.” Therefore, in the field of inquiry of science, the beginner is more probable than the export to make the significant innovation.

In sum, as I mentioned above, in any field of inquiry, such as the creation of arts, the invention of science, or other fields, the speaker's statement is levelheaded that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.



issue4. "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."

issue84. "In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field."

issue87. "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."

ayrieUID: 128476

有人写么?

kkytUID: 188814

偶来看以下这篇,一会我也写以下

kkytUID: 188814

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.
I agree with the speaker's assertion that in any field of inquiry, such as the creation of arts, the breakthrough of science, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.[啊？你是完全同意？分领域，看你怎么论证，列举法能列全所有领域么？别忘了有any field 这个词]

In the field of arts, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries [because beginner is easily be more creative than the well-trained expert.][为什么？暂且不管，向下看] The function of arts is upset so the ability of creation is the soul of any important discoveries in this field. For example, the drawing method of dark-contrast is an important discovery in the history of portrait. Robin Green was considered to be a beginner because he had not been trained with any [formal drawing lessons]. However, Robin abolished the traditional method, and he tried to create a more "natural" and more "shaping" portrait-drawing method. And then he successfully fined the inspiration from his dark bedroom and invented the dark-contrast method. The experts of Robin's time could not easily make such critical discovery because they were trained to be a skillful master, not a adventurer. Therefore, in the field of arts, the beginner is more likely than the expert to inquire important discoveries. [这段论证还行，问题是对beginner 和expert 的理解上，beginner 就一定没有受过formal drawing lessons ?experts 就一定有？Webster 对此词的解释是  an inexperience person 也就是说关键在于是否有experience ]

The speaker’s assertion is rational to some extent in the field of science, as well.[你是同意在any field 怎么又让步？向下看] In any field of science, such as physics, chemistry, biology, or even mathematics, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, for the reason that whichever advancement of science needs critical thinking and creation, while the expert is less apt to make irregular and even incorrect action than the beginner. For instance, the discovery of DNA double-helix structure was made by two young scientists, though this discovery was consider to be a milestone of molecular biology, it is surprising that none of the two scientist were majored in that field, therefore they were beginner of that field. As Watson, one the scientist once said (and I paraphrased): “After I awarded the Noble Prize, many people had asked me that why am I, as a physics doctor and a beginner in biology, could make such a significant discovery. The reason is simple but paradox, just because I am a beginner in biology, I dare to use irregular method that other biological experts did not ever imagine.” Therefore, in the field of inquiry of science, the beginner is more probable than the export [expert] to make the significant innovation.

In sum, as I mentioned above, in any field of inquiry, such as the creation of arts, the invention of science, or other fields, the speaker's statement is levelheaded that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.


[感觉论证不足，还是平衡的观点好，你说在any field 领域，就应分humanities ,social sciences and sciences 三大领域论证啊，你好象不全]
[照你这么一说，某行的专家都是垃圾了，不可能有创新是么？而且偶要提醒你Watson 是生物专业的 Crick是物理专业的，当然ETS那群垃圾是不会知道这么多的 ]
[  从DNA双螺旋结构的发现过程，我们可以得到一些有益的启示。1.将一个学科发展成熟的知识、技术和方法应用到另一学科的前沿，能够产生重大的创新成果。2.重大的科学发现不会孤立出现，在它之前必然已经有前人大量的探索。3.高明的学术领导人，善于及时开辟新的发展方向，又善于创造宽松的学术环境。4.取得重大发现的路程不会一帆风顺，青年科学家必须像沃森和克里克那样，充满自信，不畏艰险，不怕失败，不怕嘲笑，以坚定不移的努力去实现认定的目标。[这是他们成功的原因]5.要敢于竞争，更要善于合作。沃森和克里克之最后成功，在于他们之间有良好合作。6.保持理论和实验的密切合作是取得重大发现，证明理论正确的关键。]

ayrieUID: 128476

Watson 是学动物学博士，严格讲不是分子生物学领域的;)