寄托06年7月机经整理（2006.07.17）||请到此贴汇报机井,请勿灌水－revised by 明版

gluglyUID: 2202227

4.20 厦门大学，
issue 4， arg 是关于那个Waymarsh 和 Graville 类比的 share the rides的，
跟我一起考的哥们是Iissue 151 ARG 是 岛的children 培养的 observation 和 interview 的问题，

不好意思，考玩了就把所有作文资料都删了， 终于解脱了，后面的兄弟加油啊

patriciabbUID: 189317

issue 43
        69
频率不是很高,但是都想过了
大家好运

charliecute6UID: 2181712

4.21 上海
Issue54 168
argu 题号忘了 但是关于应不应该录取男学生进入女校。
谢谢给我帮助的前辈们。都是高频。

jie_hustUID: 2199322

4.21 武汉
Issue 4和48
Argument 143

lazyguiUID: 185222

i61
a38
a是高频
i最多算中频

西安
4.21

apelewangUID: 2201216

4月19 北京
issue 51
arg174

cagalliyulaUID: 2190966

一休
185 丑闻
另一个迷有看…………似乎极其低频

阿狗
关键词 study， television，fiction， print media，是由一个调查得出印刷媒体将不会再盈利之类的。 具体是哪个题目记不清了

祝后面各位gter好运：）

rabbit1860UID: 2136201

西安
issue 95"People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."

argument 147

sunny_cnUID: 2176981

我
南京4月20日
Issue:151/142
Argument:120

我同学
南京四月二十日
Issue:108/4

Alice.zouUID: 2198512

ISSUE: THE ABSCENSE OF CHOICE IS A VERY, VERY RARE SITUATION
ARGUMENT: 关于在两个社区加一些限制是否同样会对房产起到升值的作用,有一个社区叫BOOKVILLE
不好意思,手里没题库了,只能这样了..

shizheng31UID: 2160138

21号早上8：30 南京
ISSUE： 一篇是讲从外表行动等能看出一个人很多信息
            另一篇是讲学习历史的好处可以反驳一个印象， 不同时代的人是完全不同的。
ARGUMENT： 学校要聘请另一所学校的音乐老师，他使那个学校赢得三次区域比赛。

[ 本帖最后由 shizheng31 于 2006-4-22 12:45 编辑 ]

shizheng31UID: 2160138

再来一遍：南京 21日早上8：30
ISSUE：208 和 221 好象都很高频啊！
ARGUMENT：26。
具体的信息可以看
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

小稚菊叶子UID: 2123570

南京21号早上8：30
ISSUE152   还有一题没看
ARGUMENT117 就是OFFICE MACHINE

archyUID: 2147748

时间：04/21   8：30~~呵呵
地点：南京

Issue
185 “Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. ”

41"Such non-mainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science."

Argument
174.The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee.

"We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumni who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all-female, therefore, will improve morale among students and convince alumni to keep supporting the college financially."

[ 本帖最后由 archy 于 2006-4-22 15:39 编辑 ]

archyUID: 2147748

连着3个南京的呢~~~都算是高频了，所以后面的XDJM们加油啊~~~~