issue153 ...fantasy group...First one(不限时，欢迎来拍)

mmeiwUID: 2101523

我的第一篇Issue，用时60分， 已做初步修改，欢迎高手指点！:$

153"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."

提纲：
1）应该质疑，质疑权威才能学到真知识。
2）质疑所学的东西才会使学习更深入，更全面。
3）但不是所有知识都需要怀疑，比如一些学科领域的基础知识应先被动接受。

Whether students should question whatever they are taught or they should accept it passively? Some people may deem that the knowledge taught to the students is so authoritative that the students should accept it without questioning. Other group of people who hold the opposite opinion support that students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study because the knowledge is changing with the time. In my point of view, however, both these two opinion are too absolute to be well accepted. I quite agree with the speaker to the extent that students sometimes ought to suspect what they study and develop their own perspective, but sometimes it is essential for students to accept what they are taught without suspecting. The students should have different attitudes toward learning depending on their knowledge level.

The first reason I support the speaker’s opinion is that authority is not always right. With the development of science, technology and thought, many authoritative theories, which have been considered as a truth at certain time, are proved unfounded or even entirely mistaken. Becon advocated the idea of testing the authority in order to gain real knowledge. Causal knowledge acquires certain skepticism to whatever we study even since the dawn of our civilization. A good case in point is Copernicus who established the Heliocentric Conjecture to challenge the Ptolemaic’s long-standing assumption of astronomy which insisted that the earth is the center of universe. Although Copernicus’s conjecture is not the case in our insight today, he made a big progress in his time in the field of astronomy. Another example is Galileo who found the law of falling objects which conflicted to the well-accepted theory of Aristotle that the falling speed was proportional to the weight of the objects. Thus, by questioning what the students study, they might acquire real knowledge and the knowledge itself could also been developed.

The second argument that the students should suspect what they study is that only by questioning what the students study could they learn intensively and roundly. It is impossible for certain materials to involve all aspects of knowledge. When they study a novel, for instance, there might be some contents concerning science, anthropology, arts, culture, and so on, along with the story. All these contents outside the plots might exist some problems open to doubt because it is impossible for the author to be a person knowing all kinds of knowledge after all. Through suspecting and checking other relative materials, the reader may find some mistakes in this novel and learn more information about other fields than the mere novel.

It is true that students should bring a certain skepticism to what they study, but there are still a large variety of basic knowledge that students should better passively accepted, such as the primary principles in mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. It is the basic knowledge that the students could establish their own skepticism based on which. Without a certain accumulation of substantiated theory foundation, the skepticism of them would quite possible be an untenable one.

To sum up, without questioning the authority, the students might not obtain the real knowledge. And without passive accepting a certain quantity of basic principles of knowledge, the students could not establish their defensible skepticism on the authority. Consequently, the students should question what they study on the basis of sufficiently primary knowledge accumulation.

aggiezxUID: 2105569

It is the basic knowledge on which the students could establish their own skepticism .

substantiated theory foundation--substantial theoretical foundation?
quite possible be an untenable one--possibly

mmeiwUID: 2101523

哦，一着急脑袋就空白了！:L
谢谢！你的语法功底不错吗！

weiweizhuUID: 179352

Whether students should question whatever they are taught or they should accept it passively? Some people may deem that the knowledge taught to the students is so authoritative that the students should accept it without questioning. (while)Other group of people who hold the opposite opinion support that students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study because the knowledge is changing with the time. In my point of view, however, both these two opinion are too absolute to be well accepted. I quite agree with the speaker to the extent that students sometimes ought to suspect what they study and develop their own perspective, but sometimes it is essential for students to accept what they are taught without suspecting. The students should have different attitudes toward learning depending on their knowledge level.(第一段太长了，考官不会那么有耐心看下去得，即使想写那么长也要先把自己得观点亮出来）
The first reason I support the speaker’s opinion is that authority is not always right. With the development of science, technology and thought, many authoritative theories, which have been considered as a truth at certain time, are proved unfounded or even entirely mistaken. Becon advocated the idea of testing the authority in order to gain real knowledge. Causal knowledge acquires certain skepticism to whatever we study even since the dawn of our civilization. A good case in point is Copernicus who established the Heliocentric Conjecture to challenge the Ptolemaic’s long-standing assumption of astronomy which insisted that the earth is the center of universe. Although Copernicus’s conjecture is not the case in our insight today, he made a big progress in his time in the field of astronomy. Another example is Galileo who found the law of falling objects which conflicted to the well-accepted theory of Aristotle that the falling speed was proportional to the weight of the objects. Thus, by questioning what the students study, they might acquire real knowledge and the knowledge itself could also been developed.（这段例子用得很好，不过好像大家都举这及格例子，是不是应该换换啊）

（不太连贯，很生硬）The second argument that the students should suspect what they study is that only by questioning what the students study could they learn intensively and roundly. It is impossible for certain materials to involve all aspects of knowledge. When they study a novel, for instance, there might be some contents concerning science, anthropology, arts, culture, and so on, along with the story. （好像和authorty没关系啊）All these contents outside the plots might exist some problems open to doubt because it is impossible for the author to be a person knowing all kinds of knowledge after all. Through suspecting and checking other relative materials, the reader may find some mistakes in this novel and learn more information about other fields than the mere novel.

It is true that students should bring a certain skepticism to what they study, but there are still a large variety of basic knowledge that students should better passively accepted, such as the primary principles in mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. It is the basic knowledge that the students could establish their own skepticism based on which. Without a certain accumulation of substantiated theory foundation, the skepticism of them would quite possible be an untenable one.（好）
To sum up, without questioning the authority, the students might not obtain the real knowledge. And without passive accepting a certain quantity of basic principles of knowledge, the students could not establish their defensible skepticism on the authority. Consequently, the students should question what they study on the basis of sufficiently primary knowledge accumulation

总体上楼主已经写得很到位了，每个观点都有相应得论证和名人论据

但是在语句得起承转合上不够自然

而且我看这篇文章老有似曾相识的感觉，好像这篇超高频大家都是这么写的

mmeiwUID: 2101523

思路没打开，看过提纲，可能受影响了。:L