- 最后登录
- 2020-11-12
- 在线时间
- 98 小时
- 寄托币
- 14757
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-3
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 242
- 精华
- 5
- 积分
- 15512
- UID
- 208370
![Rank: 9](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level3.gif) ![Rank: 9](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level1.gif)
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 14757
- 注册时间
- 2005-5-3
- 精华
- 5
- 帖子
- 242
|
12月22号 分析范文
"It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them."
SAMPLE-1 (score 6)
The statement above conceals[ infesting connotations] far above curriculum development. Issues of [classroom control] and [development of scholarly talents] are at stake, not simply a debate over which books are acceptable or over revisionist histories.[只能感叹作者的见解太深邃了,恩恩,直接摆出观点,对下面的文章总领,且一针见血,一般我写作文,都是对题目发表一下看法,从来没有对其从逻辑层面 进行过分析]
The statement itself is a bit misleading in that in my experience, student control over curriculum hardly existed.[从自己的经历出发] Each year, there were certain course offerings made available, and students were to choose from those offerings, of course bearing in mind requirements for graduation set forth by the administration. [这个长句用的好的,好多的结构啊,怎样让文章不单调又不乱,我想我应该从句子上下点工夫吧] On a classroom level, [the immediate, initial ]material may have been somewhat directed by the students, but this was a part of the process allowed by the teacher/professor in order to gain the [interest and attention] of the students.[对于实质作者看的真清楚,然后说的很细,同时也是做了一个小让步,只是这个让步是把握在他的手里而已,也为下个层次做好铺垫了] However, too much of any one thing becomes problematic; letting students set the curriculum,[as ]with letting students choose and design their own major in college, serves ultimately to [dilute ]the quality of the educational experience[ unless] a single advisor can devote significant amounts of time to the individual student. [这个还是用的很棒的长句,一点也不乱,还显得很充实] This amount of time, or even the expense to the student of this individual attention, seem to indicate that resources would be better allocated elsewhere.[关于这段,层次很清楚,先摆观点,然后小让步,转折。恩,但给我最大的感受还是关于长句的使用]
Of course, any school in which the students decide ["what goes"]is[ bound to]have problems controlling students. [承接上段说dilute the quality of education,上 段最后是给出观点,这里是扩充] Once the educators, be they administrators or teachers, are under the control of students, [even a democratic situation would be like holding royalty acountable to the mob.这种句子都是添彩的,到上个分句为止的话,就比较空洞] Presently, students hear for hours that they should not forget to use a condom[ in the heat of the moment,]and educators think the message gets through, while half the kids can't even remember to[ bring a pencil to class.展开的好细啊,语言很形象] Students go to school not to simply learn the Pythagorean theorem, but to learn direction and receive guidance.[至此又对上面的细节做了一个总结] This cannot occur when students are in charge, and standards, already hard to find in America's contemporary public schools, will become unenforceable. [好句子] If students dictate and administrators do, students will never learn academic responsibility, and if they can't[ be held accountable for] homework, what other responsibilities will they avoid when they get older?
[这几个总结归纳的句子写的都很有力,主要是句子结构多变,长句使用的很棒。我突然想到了自己写,细节展开的倒是很多,字数也真是很少,为什么我的就显得重复显得乱呢?估计就是没有围绕一个中心点展开,还有语言上的单调造成的吧,另外给我的启示是,在展开之后一定要有点题的总结,要有一个收尾]
But in another sense, teachers and students do exist in a partnership of sorts.[这里是文章的升华,可以看评论The line of reasoning is strengthened by the discussion of how teachers and students can work in partnership to satisfy the needs of students.] Teachers are there to satisfy the needs of the student, [and ]the student, [while ]perhaps not being the most experienced/ knowledgeable person on what his/her needs actually are (versus wants), at least should be[ afforded some say.] [又是个好句子,哈哈,对比性很强,当说到两者的相辅相成的作用时候可以用捏] In addition, we must remember what the purpose of education is, and that there are different levels of education.[这个段落很好的提到了一个高度,从应该谁决定课程到教育的目的来]
In high school, the focus is not so much on learning actual material. The focus is on[ developing study habits, and on social interaction. ] [承接上段,举了high school 具体的说教育应该怎么做才好]The best secondary schools promote an environment in which individual creativity and pacing can be developed, [后面的从句就具体的说明了是什么能力]where students are taught to think on their own, and learn to debate and argue in a scholarly way, through writing and other formal methods of discourse.[我现在明白了,展开的细致是体现在围绕一个点时候的,不是说天马行空的从很多面来说,还是要有一个主线的。这里展开的就很好,句子整齐,很具体] Group collaboration and interpersonal skills are developed and honed. The actual details of what is studied and tested is of less importance. [除了长句外,短句用的也很好] Whether a student reads Maya Angelou, or Yeats, or Euripides essentially is beside the point as long as a student's mind is cultivated, not just their ability to record and recite. What is important is that secondary students develop and grow in the hands of the professionals.
The secondary educational experience is designed to prepare a student for college. It is in college where the individual learns to examine the world and how it works, and the individual's place in it.
[关于这段,评论是关于它的展开例子方面的The argument is further advanced with concrete examples from high school courses showing how teachers provide guidance for students through group collaboration, development of interpersonal skills, and preparation for college. The examples are varied (from condom use to reading Angelou, Yeats, or Euripides) and used effectively to further support the writer's position.]
As for duty, it is the educators' duty not simply to determine the curriculum, but to present it effectively. [点的好] They cannot half-heartedly paint it on the blackboard, they must enliven it and actually teach. [感觉和枯燥的说理相比,这样形象话具体的语言更有说服力] [Hard work must be lauded, while freeloaders are punished. ] These are the duties of teachers, and the duty of the students is not just to learn or study, but to grow. An independent mind is what students need, and that mind has to be in a position to want and be able to question beyond the material presented, not simply to question its legitimacy. That distinction, though subtle, is the difference between letting the students follow a self-destructive course of premature self-determination on the one hand , and permitting on the other hand the fostering of great talents through a cooperative, mentoring relationship[又和题目紧紧联系起来了,评论:ties the essay together.]
[关于这篇范文,我觉得最有启发的地方总结如下:
1, 语言方面,真的很精确,长短句结合使用的很好,用词多变化,句式不单调
2, 在论证方面,步步深入,观点鲜明,围绕观点展开地很细致,主要的是最后还有收尾,很关键
3, 另外作者时时刻刻都和题目紧紧地联系着,显得文章很紧凑]
COMMENTARY
This is an insightful, well-articulated discussion of curricular responsibility and the larger issue of academic responsibility. After a brief introduction examining assumptions implied by the topic, the writer skillfully develops the position that letting students dictate the curriculum could dilute the educational experience. Allowing students to determine the curriculum, the writer claims, will deny them the guidance and direction they need to learn academic responsibility.
The line of reasoning is strengthened by the discussion of how teachers and students can work in partnership to satisfy the needs of students. The argument is further advanced with concrete examples from high school courses showing how teachers provide guidance for students through group collaboration, development of interpersonal skills, and preparation for college. The examples are varied (from condom use to reading Angelou, Yeats, or Euripides) and used effectively to further support the writer's position.
In the conclusion, the writer thoughtfully discusses how educators should not only determine the curriculum but present it in an enlivened and appropriate manner. The final sentence, contrasting a "self-destructive course of premature self-determination" and "a cooperative, mentoring relationship," ties the essay together.
The essay is [clearly organized] although the writer does not rely on conventional phrases (such as "first," "second," etc.) to signal the organizational structure. Instead, the organization and focus progress through the line of reasoning that [moves fluently and coherently ]from one paragraph to the next.
Language use is generally[ precise and effective ](e.g., "holding royalty accountable to the mob"), and[ sentence structure is well controlled ](e.g., "hard work must be lauded, while freeloaders are punished"). The few errors are minor, the kind that can easily be made -- and forgiven -- under testing conditions.
This outstanding response received a score of 6. |
|