issue114 义无反顾小组第十词作业

kittywen_16UID: 2135347

144．"It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
是艺术家而不是批评家，带给社会一些具有持久价值的东西。*批评家指经常评价艺术作品 ，例如小说、电影、音乐、绘画等的人。

赞成
（1）评论家可以向向大众诠释艺术作品；
（2）评论家的评论可以使艺术家反思其作品；
（3）两者结合才能发挥艺术的魅力；

Is it the artists rather than the critics who have given society some valuable things as the statement contends? Although I agree that artists are the origins of the creativity and imagination, and in the long history they bring immense glamour spiritual treasures or society, we can't neglect the positive impact the critics have had on the process of interpretation these great works for whole world. As a result, I think it is the mutual effort of the artists and the critics, who offer us something valuable.

Can a sculptor articulate to the public why he made the statuary in this way and what the meaning of his work? Can a spectator enjoy a ballet dance without knowing the background of the story? Can an ordinary visitor stand before an impressionist painting for more than 3 seconds lacking of the introduction of the painter? In most cases, the answers are no. If we turn for the critics, this embarrassment will be resolved. Therefore, interpreting the deep meaning of an art work to the ordinary is one of the basic function of a critic, just like building a bridge linking the spiritual realm of the artists to the practical world of the public. The critic is a good supplement of the artists. It is not an easy work for most of the editorials should be impartial and constructive, which should give the public a reasonable guide to the art world. Therefore, many critics are the professors in some areas, and have seen great numbers of such works until they are eligible to explain the soul behind the surface. We can imagine without critics people will miss the enjoyment of some universical and eternal things which is inside the art works.  

The critic's views, in some extent, represent for the public views, which in turn, can help the artist retrospect his work and bring up more creative inspiration. Though art has many incarnations, such as: drama, music, painting, film, poet and so on, all of them have the common functions as generalized in following: (1) providing pleasure and escape from the reality;(2) expressing of private feelings and criticism of society; (3) propagandizing some principles. When the artist wants to depicted the realities in his art and regrad it as the warrentsto the authority, it should have solid support from the public. The critic will help the artist step out his ego world. For instance, Dufu, one of the greatest poets in ancient China, featured largely in his realist style poems, often read his new works to his mother, an old illiterate woman, and revised the poems until she can know what the meaning of the words. His mother was acted as a critics though she was not aware. As a result, the artists can justify their works with the assistant of the critics.      

Admittedly, no one is born without bias, which is rooted in different factors, such as believes, customs, values, traditions and so on. A Critic also has his own considerations when he appraises the value of a art work. Especially in this practical society, many professional critics make their living on the revenue of the editorials, hence what they said have the direct relationship with their salary. Consequently, before they write their columns they maybe consider whether it cater for the taste of the public, whether it can raise his prestige in the future. With the direction of these thought, we are suspicious of the justice of his critic.  

In sum, artist and critics are supplement of each other. Overemphasizing either side will lead to impartial view in the long run.


不好意思，标题写错了。

[ 本帖最后由 kittywen_16 于 2006-5-24 14:23 编辑 ]

yuviUID: 2169411

Is the artist, not the critic, who gives the lasting value things for the society? I agree with this statement. Not only because the artist who is always the original creator makes his/her work valued from a economic perspective, but also, the artist gives people both the sensory and thinking impacts in human beings' long history.

First of all, there are many art works, lasting from past age till nowadays, worth for large amounts in the economic market. Take the painting for example. As we all know, some works from the famous painters, like Van Gogh, Da Vinci, Pablo Picasso, and Claude Monet etc., all of their works are worth for the huge-amount economic values in today's world. The same happened in other artists' works. Like the famous novels Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre, both of them were been filmized on the wide screen and great succeed in their box markets. These examples tell us, the artists' work, with creative ideas, brought valuable treasures for our society in an economic way. Because these economic reasons, provide more chances for people to memorize the artist’s works in a long periods in the history.

The reason that makes people always enhance by the artist's works, I think it might be both the sensory and thinking impacts from the works of the artist. While a normal person first involved in an artist's work, it might be several different sensory feelings came out from his mind. 'I grew/Like Ganymede – the Trojan/I was by storms and fancies hauled/Like wings, my hardships were a-grown/And separated me from soil.' This section is from the Russian litterateur, Boris Pasternak's one poem. People who attacked by these words, might got some associations from Greek Myths, according to the old and present times, to think and understand the meanings made by Pasternak. It works the same way in other art works. For instance, the music, films, novels etc., all of them are bring the sensory concussions and then make people thinking about the inside meanings. The artist's work represents a resonance of human's taste, and more important, such resonance makes people to think, to understand the most real values for art works.

Admittedly, the critic provides some insights about the works from artist, and he/she might point out the weakness of the art works. Such as the film review can help audience to decide which movie is worth for watching, and which one is real sucks. Or the literature critic may provide some suggestions about the readings for the public, and serves as a filter to help people do not go wasting their time on uninspired works. However, like what Shakespeare says: ‘One thousand audiences, and one thousand Hamlets.’ Everyone got their own backgrounds and personalities in the world; therefore, their art recognitions about the values, the tastes, and the identities are widely divergent. Hence, in my point of view, the critic's function is much less than the original works that the artist have done, and the critic's existing for a meaning at present, could be seen as a flash in the pan in human's history.

In sum, the function of the critic cannot to be comparing with the function of the artist. Even the critic has some positions in today's world, but he/she does not make any long-lasting value in the reality. On the other hand, the artist, always provide the sensory and thinking impacts for insight and appreciation of the cultural history.

yuviUID: 2169411

终于赶在迟到之前把作文写完了~~~这篇作业真是painstaking...:(

附上题目和提纲:

144."It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

提纲:

1.艺术作品的经济效益长久
2.艺术家所带来的感官和思维上的冲击力
3.(让步段)

一共写了575个字,不敢限时,写了快两个小时..感觉这种题材的文章如果不用很多例子堆积,恐怕没有办法写得完整.
:(:(

calsunnyUID: 2163431

对啊，是144，不是114呢？

AnddieUID: 2135826

模仿范文
仍然写的超级辛苦～～:L:L:L

观点：中立

提纲：
1。艺术家的作用：
   定义，艺术的目的
   艺术目的带来价值
2。批评家的作用：
   批评家更专业，更能引导大众正确认识艺术品的价值
   批评家对作品的挖掘可以为其带来更多的理解和价值
   批评家的评论对作者可以起到启发，激励的作用
3。总结：二者共同给予了艺术持久的价值

It is commonly accepted that a most important purpose of art is to give society something of a lasting value, whereas a great many people think that artists are achieving this all by themselves, without the help of critics. However, I would rather believe that the two groups are both necessities in the process of evaluating an artistic work.

On one hand, art is a way through which artists try to express themselves. As was defined by Freud in one of his famous writings, art is "a kind of release (discharge) of individual lust, converting the human libido into plentiful creativity". Through the definition, we may see that the ultimate purpose of art is to reflect human's principles behind the profound work and to open up space for artists to deliver themselves of their feelings, passions and desires. Nearly all the world-known works are evidences of this definition, such as Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, which is a mirror of his tough life and his suspicions toward human's trust and destiny, as well as Jane Eyer, a production of the author's understanding of true love and appeal to women's equal rights and opportunities of education.

Hence, artists' emotions and feelings containing in the works accumulates and are released in the form of art so as to contribute to art's value. It is quite reasonable for us to conclude that the artists, in essence, give the society the major part of art's lasting value.

One the other hand, critics play an important role on leading the populace to better understand the value of art and, in some way, enlarge the influences of art. Most of the time, artworks are not so popular among ordinary people, for art figures are not that intuitionistic as we think. In order to completely get the artists' ideas, one must be comprehensively knowledgable about art or literature, as well as absolutely sensitive to capture the artists' intentions that suddenly flashes through his mind. Since it is not practical to make every individual to achieve this, critics are desperately needed to act like interfaces between artists and the viewers so as to enlighten the latter the implicit meaning of works.

Another contribution of critics is that, when digging artworks, they may gather some ideas or value that are not initially born in the authors' mind, or, at least, not in the previous critics' mind. This probably happen because art is radically the opinions and understanding of things around us. Different people with different growing experience may have quite distinct feelings upon one artwork. The critic's deep understanding of art and humanity can instills the works new significations that could have been omitted by the author. This explains why Da Vinci's famous painting Mona Lisa have aroused so much debates and doubts after so many years, some of which may have far beyond the painter's mind and thoughts.

Finally, critics' comments on works serve as feedback to artists, that are fairly inspiring and illuminous to artists, especially to those artists young and fresh. In case that an artist's work is widely praised, the positive attitude of critics can be the best reward and great power to him, encouraging him to move on to do better works. Even thought an artist's work is not entirely approbated by critics, the remarks on it may become his constant prompt and guide him to a new direction of studying and a better understanding of art .

Without artists, there would be no artworks for us to appreciate and art would deviate from its essences of reflecting human values. But with the absense of critics, art will be isolated from public, bit by bit deflected and lose its vigor and proceeding motivities. Thus, it is not wise for us to ignore either of the two roles' functions when talking about the contribution to the value of art. While artists creat us a ship of art, critics apply themselves as the lighthouses on the sea, guiding our ship to stay away from submerged rocks and sail to the supposed destination.

[ 本帖最后由 Anddie 于 2006-5-24 12:45 编辑 ]

yuviUID: 2169411

KITTY, 你的帖子的题目也写错了阿..

互改顺序: anddie ---> yuvi ---> kitty ---> anddie

因为现在写作业的人不多,以后就规定是下楼改上一楼的作业了哈~~
(方便有时间的同学可以先改文章~~:))

yuviUID: 2169411

kitty的:

Is it the artists rather than the critics who have given society some valuable things as the statement contends? Although I agree that artists are the origins of the creativity and imagination, and in the long history they bring immense glamour spiritual treasures or society（这一句看得不是很明白）, we can't neglect the positive impact the critics have had on the process of interpretation these great works for whole world. As a result, I think it is the mutual effort of the artists and the critics, who offer us something valuable.(又是很完整的开头，发问点题+称述观点,赞~)

Can a sculptor articulate to the public why he made the statuary in this way and what the meaning of his work? Can a spectator enjoy a ballet dance without knowing the background of the story? Can an ordinary visitor stand before an impressionist painting for more than 3 seconds lacking of the introduction of the painter? （三连问的形式。。TS可以这样写吗？？请教~~）In most cases, the answers are no. If we turn for the critics, this embarrassment will be resolved. Therefore, interpreting the deep meaning of an art work to the ordinary is one of the basic function of a critic, just like building a bridge linking the spiritual realm of the artists to the practical world of the public. （感觉提出的问题和这里的论证似乎衔接的不是太好。。）The critic is a good supplement of the artists. It is not an easy work for most of the editorials should be impartial and constructive, which should give the public a reasonable guide to the art world. Therefore, many critics are the professors in some areas（应该有可能是，不能限定吧？）, and have seen great numbers of such works until they are eligible to explain the soul behind the surface. We can imagine without critics people will miss the enjoyment of some universical and eternal things which is inside the art works.  （呵呵，这一段连续发问的论证形式我觉得不错，学习ing。但是似乎和论点的观念不是很大联系。）
The critic's views, in some extent, represent for the public views, which in turn, can help the artist retrospect his work and bring up more creative inspiration. （这一段还是在肯定评论家的作用吗？）Though art has many incarnations, such as: drama, music, painting, film, poet and so on, all of them have the common functions as generalized in following: (1) providing pleasure and escape from the reality;(2) expressing of private feelings and criticism of society; (3) propagandizing some principles. When the artist wants to depicted the realities in his art and regrad it as the warrentsto the authority, it should have solid support from the public. The critic will help the artist step out his ego world. For instance, Dufu, one of the greatest poets in ancient China, featured largely in his realist style poems, often read his new works to his mother, an old illiterate woman, and revised the poems until she can know what the meaning of the words. His mother was acted as a critics though she was not aware. （杜甫的例子是关于别人对他诗词的理解，我觉得这应该是属于他自己对于自己作品的严格要求所置，MS拿来说和评论家的作用有点点牵强哈）As a result, the artists can justify their works with the assistant of the critics.      

Admittedly, no one is born without bias, which is rooted in different factors, such as believes, customs, values, traditions and so on. A Critic also has his own considerations when he appraises the value of a art work. Especially in this practical society, many professional critics make their living on the revenue of the editorials, hence what they said have the direct relationship with their salary. Consequently, before they write their columns they maybe consider whether it cater for the taste of the public, whether it can raise his prestige in the future. With the direction of these thought, we are suspicious of the justice of his critic.（这一段有提到需要两者结合吗？好象大部分都是在说评论家如何如何吧）  
In sum, artist and critics are supplement of each other. Overemphasizing either side will lead to impartial view in the long run.

总结：

kitty你的提纲虽说写的赞同的态度，但是我觉得你的文风更像有条件的反对。
因为首先，你在文章里几乎没正面说到关系艺术家的价值。再次，你的文章从结构上来看基本上是一边倒得阐述了评论家的作用。还有就是我觉得你要重新写一下让步段的内容。：）

yuviUID: 2169411

扛不住了,先去睡觉,明天早上再来交今天的作业argu 117,还有这次的小结~~

越到后面越觉得时间不够用,再就是觉得自己什么都没有复习好:(
头昏眼花中。..状态极差..:(
呵呵~~anyway .大家加油..:)

glxingUID: 2156425

芹菜，我回来了,报个到。
还没来得及写，就先批改一下别人的吧，我批改kitty的吧——谁让她又是第一呢，奖励一下。
芹菜和ak的我也会看得，毕竟这篇文章不好写。

glxingUID: 2156425

呵呵，芹菜又抢在我的前面了，不过，我们三个正好可以“碰撞”一下思想，讨论讨论。

Is it the artists rather than the critics who have given society some valuable things as the statement contends? Although I agree that artists are the origins of the creativity and imagination, and in the long history they bring immense glamour spiritual treasures or society（这一句看得不是很明白）, we can't neglect the positive impact the critics have had on the process of interpretation these great works for whole world. As a result, I think it is the mutual effort of the artists and the critics, who offer us something valuable.(又是很完整的开头，发问点题+称述观点,赞~)

Can a sculptor articulate to the public why he made the statuary in this way and what the meaning of his work? Can a spectator enjoy a ballet dance without knowing the background of the story? Can an ordinary visitor stand before an impressionist painting for more than 3 seconds lacking of the introduction of the painter? （三连问的形式。。TS可以这样写吗？？请教~~）我看到这样的格式也感到很新颖，不过，这样写可能让人乍一看难于理解——失去ts的作用了，建议先写ts再这样写In most cases, the answers are no. If we turn for the critics, this embarrassment will be resolved. Therefore, interpreting the deep meaning of an art work to the ordinary is one of the basic function of a critic, just like building a bridge linking the spiritual realm of the artists to the practical world of the public. （感觉提出的问题和这里的论证似乎衔接的不是太好。。）The critic is a good supplement of the artists. It is not an easy work for most of the editorials should be impartial and constructive, which should give the public a reasonable guide to the art world. Therefore, many critics are the professors in some areas（应该有可能是，不能限定吧？）,这一句有点糊涂，好像因果关系没说清楚 and have seen great numbers of such works until they are eligible to explain the soul behind the surface. We can imagine without critics people will miss the enjoyment of some universical and eternal things which is inside the art works.  （呵呵，这一段连续发问的论证形式我觉得不错，学习ing。但是似乎和论点的观念不是很大联系。）这一段观点不错，但如芹菜所说——中间衔接不好，所以显得有些乱。

The critic's views, in some extent, represent for the public views, which in turn, can help the artist retrospect his work and bring up more creative inspiration. （这一段还是在肯定评论家的作用吗？）Though art has many incarnations, such as: drama, music, painting, film, poet and so on, all of them have the common functions as generalized in following: (1) providing pleasure and escape from the reality;(2) expressing of private feelings and criticism of society; (3) propagandizing some principles.好厉害，竟然把艺术的本质都写出来了！你是自己想的，还是摘抄的？ When the artist wants to depicted the realities in his art and regrad it as the warrents to the authority, it should have solid support from the public. The critic will help the artist step out his ego world. For instance, Dufu, one of the greatest poets in ancient China, featured largely in his realist style poems, often read his new works to his mother, an old illiterate woman, and revised the poems until she can know what the meaning of the words. His mother was acted as a critics though she was not aware. （杜甫的例子是关于别人对他诗词的理解，我觉得这应该是属于他自己对于自己作品的严格要求所置，MS拿来说和评论家的作用有点点牵强哈）我倒不觉得，我认为例子还可以（尽管那个人是白居易不是杜甫），因为仔细想想，那个老母亲就相当于一个民间批评家了As a result, the artists can justify their works with the assistant of the critics.      

Admittedly, no one is born without bias, which is rooted in different factors, such as believes, customs, values, traditions and so on. A Critic also has his own considerations when he appraises the value of a art work. Especially in this practical society, many professional critics make their living on the revenue of the editorials, hence what they said have the direct relationship with their salary. Consequently, before they write their columns they maybe consider whether it cater for the taste of the public, whether it can raise his prestige in the future. With the direction of these thought, we are suspicious of the justice of his critic.（这一段有提到需要两者结合吗？好象大部分都是在说评论家如何如何吧）恩，这一段写的不好  
In sum, artist and critics are supplement of each other. Overemphasizing either side will lead to impartial view in the long run.

总结：

kitty你的提纲虽说写的赞同的态度，但是我觉得你的文风更像有条件的反对。
因为首先，你在文章里几乎没正面说到关系艺术家的价值。再次，你的文章从结构上来看基本上是一边倒得阐述了评论家的作用。还有就是我觉得你要重新写一下让步段的内容。：）
你们觉得让步段放在前面如何？就是先说artist的重要性。
芹菜总结的很好，另外，悄悄地问问kitty,你文中那些华丽的词语是怎么搞来的，平时积攒的吗？好羡慕你啊

kittywen_16UID: 2135347

呵呵，我一直记成杜甫，感觉他忧国忧民，诗词一定要反映现状引起皇帝重视，所以会多下功夫。



下面是批改Andiee的作业。
It is commonly accepted that a most important purpose of art is to give society something of a lasting value, whereas a great many people think that artists are achieving this all by themselves, without the help of critics. However, I would rather believe that the two groups are both necessities in the process of evaluating an artistic work.【好开头，简单又清楚！】
On one hand, art is a way through which artists try to express themselves. As was defined by Freud in one of his famous writings, art is "a kind of release (discharge) of individual lust, converting the human libido into plentiful creativity". Through the definition, we may see that the ultimate purpose of art is to reflect human's principles behind the profound work【这里不太明白】 and to open up space for artists to deliver themselves of their feelings, passions and desires. Nearly all the world-known works are evidences of this definition, such as Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, which is a mirror of his tough life and his suspicions toward human's trust and destiny, as well as Jane Eyer, a production of the author's understanding of true love and appeal to women's equal rights and opportunities of education.【例证很翔实，看来adniee做了不少工作】
Hence, artists' emotions and feelings containing in the works accumulates and are released in the form of art so as to contribute to art's value.【这句读起来好别扭啊】 It is quite reasonable for us to conclude that the artists, in essence, give the society the major part of art's lasting value.【点明了作者观点】
One the other hand, critics play an important role on leading the populace to better understand the value of art and, in some way, enlarge the influences of art. Most of the time, artworks are not so popular among ordinary people, for art figures are not that intuitionistic as we think【是不是not so…as？】. In order to completely get 【appraises】the artists' ideas, one must be comprehensively【comprehensively ：adv.包括地，不知道作者是想表达“全面地了解”还是“概括地了解”】 knowledgeable about art or literature, as well as absolutely sensitive to capture the artists' intentions that suddenly flashes through his mind【这里好像把艺术作品说得太高深，其实有很多是可以为普通人理解的，估计作者是想强调批评家的作用】. Since it is not practical to make every individual to achieve this, critics are desperately needed to act like interfaces【intermedium】 between artists and the viewers so as to enlighten the latter the implicit meaning of works.

Another contribution of critics is that, when digging artworks, they may gather some ideas or value that are not initially born in the authors' mind, or, at least, not in the previous critics' mind. This probably happen because art is radically the opinions and understanding of things around us. Different people with different growing experience may have quite distinct feelings upon one artwork. The critic's deep understanding of art and humanity【为什么出现这个词？】 can instills the works new significations that could have been omitted by the author. This explains why Da Vinci's famous painting Mona Lisa have aroused so much debates and doubts after so many years, some of which may have far beyond the painter's mind and thoughts.

Finally, critics' comments on works serve as feedback to artists, that are fairly inspiring and illuminous to artists, especially to those artists young and fresh【“年轻的艺术家”这个表达方式准确吗？】. In case that an artist's work is widely praised, the positive attitude of critics can be the best reward and great power to him, encouraging him to move on to do better works. Even thought an artist's work is not entirely approbated by critics, the remarks on it may become his constant prompt and guide him to a new direction of studying and a better understanding of art .【这部分读起来好像艺术家是为批评家创作，和前面说“艺术是个人感情和思想的宣泄有点偏差”】

Without artists, there would be no artworks for us to appreciate and art would deviate from its essences of reflecting human values【艺术作品都没有了，如何还偏离本质？后面半句可以不要】. But with the absense of critics, art will be isolated from public, bit by bit deflected and lose its vigor and proceeding motivities【两个“and”,应该分开】. Thus, it is not wise for us to ignore either of the two roles' functions when talking about the contribution to the value of art. While artists create us a ship of art, critics apply themselves as the lighthouses on the sea, guiding our ship to stay away from submerged rocks and sail to the supposed destination.【这个结尾很有趣】

总结：adniee的结构简明扼要，思路清晰，文章能围绕自己的观点合理展开论述和分析，并辅以例子证明，基本没问题。只是在最后一段论证时，我在想：既然艺术是表达自己，又要以评论家为“灯塔”，如果二者有冲突，艺术家该怎么办？
还有，有些词用法不是很准确，当然，我是根据自己的经验来判断的，有不对的地方多指正。




[ 本帖最后由 kittywen_16 于 2006-5-27 18:09 编辑 ]

yuviUID: 2169411

呵呵~~小蜗牛赞一个~~:)

我还真没有想到KITTY把白居易写成了杜甫,当时改的时候没察觉到,
呵呵.~~不过我想没有什么关系的吧,考试时影响不大:)

让步段放前面没有关系的吧,只要结构安排合适就可以了~
我是这样想的,其他人也发表一下看法??

另外:大家不要只顾着赶作业不修改了哈~~
有时间还是要把前几次的规定的作业改一下哈~~~:)

AnddieUID: 2135826

sorry,昨天还没改完就断网了

yuvi:

提纲:

1.艺术作品的经济效益长久
2.艺术家所带来的感官和思维上的冲击力
3.(让步段)

Is the artist, not the critic, who gives the lasting value things for the society? I agree with this statement. Not only because the artist who is always the original creator makes his/her work valued from a economic perspective,[艺术家进行创作是从经济的观点出发?] but also, the artist gives people both the sensory and thinking impacts in human beings' long history.

First of all, there are many art works, lasting from past age till nowadays, worth for large amounts in the economic market.[这个跟artist赋予作品价值有什么关系?]  Take the painting for example. As we all know, some works from the famous painters, like Van Gogh, Da Vinci, Pablo Picasso, and Claude Monet etc., all of their works are worth for the huge-amount economic values in today's world. The same happened in other artists' works. Like the famous novels Pride and Prejudice and Jane Eyre, both of them were been filmized on the wide screen and great succeed in their box markets. These examples tell us, the artists' work, with creative ideas, brought valuable treasures for our society in an economic way.[这些文学作品被拍成电影主要是因为他们能带来票房收入吗?] Because these economic reasons, provide more chances for people to memorize the artist’s works in a long periods in the history.[艺术的价值,即你在开头所提的lasting value things是指经济上的价值吗?而且本段中好像没怎么提artists]

The reason that makes people always enhance by the artist's works, I think it might be both the sensory and thinking impacts from the works of the artist. While a normal person first involved in an artist's work, it might be several different sensory feelings came out from his mind. 'I grew/Like Ganymede – the Trojan/I was by storms and fancies hauled/Like wings, my hardships were a-grown/And separated me from soil.' This section is from the Russian litterateur, Boris Pasternak's one poem. People who attacked by these words, might[仅仅是可能] got some associations from Greek Myths, according to the old and present times, to think and understand the meanings made by Pasternak.[本例子论证力度还欠缺,最好从语言上改一下] It works the same way in other art works. For instance, the music, films, novels etc., all of them are bring the sensory concussions and then make people thinking about the inside meanings. The artist's work represents a resonance of human's taste, and more important, such resonance makes people to think, to understand the most real values for art works.[本段主要谈艺术作品的另一个作用吧. 最好再强调一下是artists使艺术具备了这样的功能]

Admittedly, the critic provides some insights about the works from artist, and he/she might point out the weakness of the art works. Such as the film review can help audience to decide which movie is worth for watching, and which one is real sucks. Or the literature critic may provide some suggestions about the readings for the public, and serves as a filter to help people do not go wasting their time on uninspired works. However, like what Shakespeare says: ‘One thousand audiences, and one thousand Hamlets.’ Everyone got their own backgrounds and personalities in the world; therefore, their art recognitions about the values, the tastes, and the identities are widely divergent.[所以critics的意见就几乎没价值了?] Hence, in my point of view, the critic's function is much less than the original works that the artist have done,[这个对,但后面就有问题了] and the critic's existing for a meaning[?] at present, could be seen as a flash in the pan in human's history.[本句有点绝对化了,就算critics不能give value,他们对艺术也是有一定推动作用的,并且这种人不是仅在现代才存在的]

In sum, the function of the critic cannot to be comparing with the function of the artist. Even the critic has some positions in today's world, but he/she does not make any long-lasting value in the reality.[not…any 太绝对了]  On the other hand, the artist, always provide the sensory and thinking impacts for insight and appreciation of the cultural history.[结尾段最好能再具体些,不要仅仅重复前面的主题句]

[总结:
本文的观点是:艺术家给予了作品价值,而不是批评家.
但在论证时,开始时的经济效益那段好像脱离了主题,仅仅说明了艺术可以产生经济利益.
第三段的问题在于:本题是说critics不能给予艺术品价值,而不是说critics的意见完全没用,这两个在论证时有很大不同前者是后者的子集]