- 最后登录
- 2015-3-4
- 在线时间
- 16 小时
- 寄托币
- 1396
- 声望
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2006-4-18
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 10
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1196
- UID
- 2207101
 
- 声望
- 20
- 寄托币
- 1396
- 注册时间
- 2006-4-18
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 10
|
发表于 2006-6-13 14:08:57
|显示全部楼层
Education ,in some views, is supposed to fulfilled (fulfill)its responsibility effectively only by meeting each individual's(individual) needs and interests. However, in the real world ,this pattern of education is obviously impossible (and) too costly to be carried out, moreover in deeper analysis, unreasonable to come into sense.(不通顺)
First, the speaker evidently fails to consider that if every student is born to know what he or she really desires. Taking choosing courses for example, most of the courses are completely brand new to the students, especially in the primary school, those little children even don't know how to get some information which can help them know more about the new curriculums, let alone find out whether those courses are favorable or not, after all, a choice making should base on a fundamental inkling of the new courses. In this case, education should be devised to deputize those pupils to choose a comprehensive study in most basic disciplines so that they will at least have some contents to fill their first stage. This kind of exceeding duties seem to promise a balanced education not to cause students deviating at first. We can see education devised generally suitable shows its efficiency by helping the novices get out of the embarrassment of primary utterly ignorance. (例子不错)
Secondly, an unlimitedly meet to the individuals' satisfactions will spoil them by nourish self-central thoughts pattern, which apparently impairs the efficiency of education. Considering that one of education goals is to impart those adolescents how to be wide-minded ,tolerant enough to comprehend and adapt this world ,especially to let them know the absolute truism that this world can work normally without caring about whether each individual is offended by overlooking personal interests and needs.I remembered that Einstein did not like math at his early age, yet his uncle persuaded him by some enlightening way, and he at last stood on the Nobel prize honor stage. Suppose that without being characterized as compulsory , how can so many difficult sciences such as maths reach so wide a study group. Little children are natural math-zealots, whereas education offers them a opportunity not to be influenced by prejudice from those failures. However, according to the speaker, this necessity will undermine the meaning of education for it may be against some personal dislikes, albeit some are caused by misunderstanding and are pratialness??.
Admittedly, delicate modes aiming at personal desires are sometimes considerably advantageous. Just think about those disabled students ,their needs are totally different from the ordinary people. Under this circumstance, similar treatments without any distinction will show unfairness, and indeed lacking efficiency. By reviewing the growth of Helen Keller ,the greatest blind writer in history, without the special instructions from her patient abecedarian who submitted to her first uncivilized rudeness ,she would be a predeterminate nobody. But even in this situation, we can discover that this noble gardener changed her subliminally in stead of a blindly suppleness. So a smart combination of two attitudes works effectually.
So, in conclusion, the arbitrary preference to unilaterally student-centered all the time is unwise, and either meaningless. Generally speaking, Education has to prepare students for some basic faculties to decide what are really interesting and worth demanding, despite risking the misunderstanding as being dogmatic. Still, it should return the freedom to the mature spirits and fulfill its liability to suffice their reasonable choice, then we could safely call it as most effective.
So, in conclusion, the arbitrary preference to unilaterally student-centered all the time is unwise, and either meaningless. Generally speaking, Education has to prepare students for some basic faculties to decide what are really interesting and worth demanding, despite risking the misunderstanding as being dogmatic. Still, it should return the freedom to the mature spirits and fulfill its liability to suffice their reasonable choice, then we could safely call it as most effective.
文章思路不错,
不过要突出各段中心句,文章读起来不很流畅,可能我的水平不够吧,呵呵
还有贴文章一定要注意格式,让修改的人感觉舒服,之前最好在word上把自己的错字和语法错误修改好再贴。 |
|