- 最后登录
- 2007-8-22
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 23
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-13
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 15
- UID
- 2166901

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 23
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-13
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
我觉得我连词什么的还行,就是逻辑比较混乱,语言也不简洁,请大家多指教!谢谢!
————————————————————————————————————————:)
Many people consider the death penalty to be an appropriate punishment in certain cases, whilst others think that there is never a reason for it to be used.
As the most severe punishment ever, the existence of death penalty is still in doubt. In most of the cases, the criminals are killed for unforgivable guilts to which he could use nothing to make a compensation but his life. However, some people, at the standpoint of human rights to survive, detest such a deliberate deprivation of lives. As for this hot-debated issue, I’m holding the adverse opinion with them.
Granted, it is possible that the prisoners may turn himselves to law-abiding citizens, but the chances are not good and the risks are considerably high. They are such crual crimes as murder, drugpusher, or rape, to name but a few, which may probably induced by some ingrained genetic or habitual violent factors in the criminals’ mentality. It’s not the same case as picking-pocket or telling a lie, which can easily be corrected later. It’s the same case to keep a carnivore away from meat. The possibility for evil minds to be repentant is just that small.
With the soaring rate of ruthless crimes today, putting murderers into government-funding prisons instead of executions is economically unwise. It costs a large sum of money to accommodate those who should pay for their sins, which could be made much better use through aiding the poor with food and medical services. In the aspect of human resource, it’s also a waste that a bunch of army forces are occupied, standing to serve as door-keepers. At the same time, lack of power to eliminate criminal cases may bring the city’s threatened safety into a vicious spiral.
The cancellation of death penalty may even bring about something worse—the corruption of the traditional principle that we reap what we sow. Even a toddler is educated that punishment is for mistakes and award is for excellence, which, similarly, turns to be death penalty is for devilry in such case. Were criminals forgiven for homicide, thieves would relatively be remitted to have a probation. Consequently common mistakes are to be ignored, and people are free of restrictions. Finally the social system established for right and wrong will break down.
Klling is not good for always, no matter murder or execution. Yet there’s indispensalbe price to pay even for society’s safety. Those sentenced to death have already used up their orppotunities, and the next chance to choose what to do lies in their future lives, if there is one.
[ 本帖最后由 wujingxianhere 于 2006-6-14 16:52 编辑 ] |
|