Issue144 【越洋农场站队】morallrey

morallreyUID: 2191298

Issue 144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
分析：
完全赞同题目中的观点，艺术家有独创性和权威性，而评论家只是依附于艺术，他们的价值是揭示艺术本来的面目，使其更光辉或更卑微。

提纲：
1.艺术是有艺术家创造的而非评论家，只有艺术家才有权力去表达他们艺术中所蕴涵的价值给社会并在人们的生活中施展其魅力。
2．艺术家赋予艺术以生命和灵魂，而评论家只是使艺术更加富有活力，艺术得以延续的是其原创性的思想和自在的价值，评论不能使其腿色。
3．评论家的作品本身也可能是艺术，但他们始终是依附于被他们评论的艺术，而不可单独存在，这就存在了主从关系，使其价值只是归属于被他们评论的艺术。

     I'm totally in favor of the viewpoint in the issue above that it's the artist ,not the critic who gives society something of lasting value , which I consider would remain in the art permanently and bring to the world some everlasting influence .To articulate this viewpoint ,I have thought of several points elaborated below.

     First of all , art was originally created by artist and it's only them who possess the authority to convey the power contained in arts to the society and then develop its value in people's life . Just as we can appreciate and utilize some work especially certain art on the basis that we are permitted by their authors ,We have to pay great honor to the artists who have devised such great work as oil painting , marble figure, or magnificent architecture etc ,for without them such marvelous creature cannot be born .Nevertheless , critic only play the role that disinter the value contained in the art  in order to make it more explicit and let people accept them somewhat correctly and easily. However, the value in the art was not altered in fact , since critic only discover but artist does invent ,which is the basic discrepancy.

   Furthermore ,it's artists who endow life and spirit to their art ,but critic only render the art vigorous .What makes a work everlasting it's not ephemeral critique ,but the glorious idea hiding behind the art .For example ,the famous music composer Subert once composed a comely ditty called wild rose. who were not commended by his contemporary , but after years went by ,its charm exposed and people feel great sympathy for this great composer who have devoted his life to music to earn his life but finally was tortured to death by the cruelty of fortune .As an aphorism goes ,"True art will be luminous with time flying ".Whatever the remarks imposed on art ,its glory can't be erased.

    Finally ,critic also make some contribution to the society, for some critique was itself so-called  arts ,and some high level critique not only discover the value of the arts it comment ,but also creat some original idea that make the arts more glorious , hence it also contain some credible value ,however this value is always linked with the arts on which it's established ,so it not a independent value , but only attributes to the arts .For instance, some critiques on dream on the red attic ,one of the most famous classic literature in china, are very eloquent ,but they only belong to the glory of this famous literature .So a new art is a new region , everything in this region only reflect its attribution.

      To sum up ,the comparatively more important producer of lasting value is artist ,for their work can alter our world directly. However, Critic only play some minor role in creating lasting value, for their work is affiliated to art, so would be influential only when art exist .Their value is to give the art whether authentic or fake judgement , which is not value society need most, and will not be lasting.