ISSUE17 疾速末班车小组第二次作业

liuwenqi24UID: 2141136

TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
WORDS: 526          TIME: 1:40:00          DATE: 2006-8-9
提纲
1.判断法律公平不公平是个复杂的问题,有很多因素影响人们的判断
2.对待人们认为不公平的法律,不遵守并不能改变现状,应该选择更有效的方法.
3.当人们对法律有一致的判断时,应该针对不同情况选择不同的对待方法.

According to this statement, people have to obey just law and disobey unjust law. In my opinion, although it is true that people should hold different attitude toward different laws, the arguer have oversimplified such topic, since judging whether some law is just or not is much more impotent and complicated.

Firstly, whether a law is just or unjust is rarely a straightforward issue. There are many aspects which will influence public's judgments, such as region, religion, class and so on. Apparently, in our country any law have to be obeyed by all the citizens who live in different provinces, and then problems occur. Because of the regional difference, people may hold different opinions about a law. For instance, the law of elementary education force parents to send their children to school when they are 6 years old, if they do not allow, they are illegal. In some rich provinces, parents surely obey this, but for many poor farmers, who are not able to afford children’s education fees, it is unfair to claim that they are illegal. In addition, religious element sometimes would also result in people's disagreements toward the same law. For example, people in various beliefs have different definitions of freedom, therefore it is difficult to enact a law about it to satisfy them all. Thus we should not oversimplify such a complex judgments of law.

Secondly, even public own the same attitude toward some laws that they are unjust, disobeying is the last choice to change this situation. Common senses tell us that if we act against laws, we must be punished. And during such punishments, we cannot do any useful things while energy and spirit is diminished. What people are able to do to improve unfair laws is to be more powerful and make meaningful reforms of those laws. This is the most effective way to practice the intended hope. That is to say, only with rude disobedience will not any advancement be achieved. Being calm and supplicated to make powerful further development of the law with flaws, then persuading public to obey them is the key.

What is more, when persons have agreement with some laws, they should take different actions toward them. It is reasonable that people ought to obey just laws, which can restrain people's daily activities and protect most persons' legal rights. If some person is hurt by others, the criminals must be judged by the court. When the whole society run under efficient law systems, person's common daily life own security which can assure harmony of the whole society.
In the other hand, when some one have dissidence of some unjust laws, as mentioned above, they may make wise decisions to express his idea legally and make useful further improvement.

To sum up, any arguments about law is not simple and easy, we cannot make flapped conclusion without cautious consideration and analysis. In such topic, and we cannot go extreme to justify any laws are just or not. Moreover, what is also significant is that precise decisions should be made when different conditions appear. To obey what is desirable to obey, and to improve what is necessary to be improved.

[ 本帖最后由 liuwenqi24 于 2006-8-9 22:13 编辑 ]

xuxiaozhou0510UID: 2187703

提纲
1.判断法律公平不公平是个复杂的问题,有很多因素影响人们的判断
2.对待人们认为不公平的法律,不遵守并不能改变现状,应该选择更有效的方法.
3.当人们对法律有一致的判断时,应该针对不同情况选择不同的对待方法.

According to this statement, people have to obey just law and disobey unjust law. In my opinion, although it is true that people should hold different attitude toward different laws, the arguer have oversimplified such topic, since judging whether some law is just or not is much more impotent and complicated.

First, whether a law is just or unjust is rarely a straightforward issue. There are many aspects which will influence public's judgments, such as region, religion, class and so on. Apparently, in our country any law have to be obeyed by all the citizens who live in different provinces, and then problems occur. Because of the regional difference, people may hold different opinions about＊（toward ） a law. For instance, the law of elementary education force parents to send their children to school when they are 6 years old, if they do not allow, they are illegal.(they are illegal if fail to obey it也许比较好 ) In some rich provinces, parents surely obey this, but for many poor farmers, who are not able to afford children’s education fees, it is unfair to claim that they are illegal. In addition, religious element sometimes would also result in people's disagreements toward the same law. For example, people in various beliefs have different definitions of freedom, therefore it is difficult to enact a law about it to satisfy them all. Thus we should not oversimplify such a complex judgments of law. （我觉得对例子能加以解释或分析会更好一些：））

Secondly, even public own the same attitude toward some laws that they are unjust, （不好意思这句我没看懂 they指代好像不是很清楚….）disobeying is the last choice to change this situation. Common senses tell us that if we act against laws, we must be punished. And during such punishments, we cannot do any useful things while energy and spirit is diminished. What people are able to do to improve unfair laws is to be more powerful and make meaningful reforms of those laws. This is the most effective way to practice the intended hope. That is to say, only with rude disobedience will not any advancement be achieved. Being calm and supplicated to make powerful further development of the law with flaws, then persuading public to obey them is the key.

What is more, when persons have agreement with some laws, they should take different actions toward them. It is reasonable that people ought to obey just laws, which can restrain people's daily activities and protect most persons' legal rights. If some person is hurt by others, the criminals must be judged by the court. When the whole society run under efficient law systems, person's common daily life(will) own security which can assure harmony of the whole society.(状语最好能放后面比较符合外国人的写法)
In the other hand, when some one have dissidence of some unjust laws, as mentioned above, they may make wise decisions to express his idea legally and make useful further improvement.

To sum up, any arguments about law is not simple and easy, we cannot make flapped conclusion without cautious consideration and analysis. In such topic, and we cannot go extreme to justify any laws are just or not. Moreover, what is also significant is that precise decisions should be made when different conditions appear. To obey what is desirable to obey, and to improve what is necessary to be improved.

我改的不好请多原谅 ， 好多错是别人反复对我强调的，总体的我觉得你思路很清楚 加油啊！ 不过句式的变化好象少了点 多背背就好拉：）  还有你的例子好象不是很充足  我其实也很为这个发愁 不过只能多去找找背下来 毕竟这样说服力比较大。  不管怎样 ，继续努力啊！！！！！  一定很快会有提高的！

IvyscarUID: 2143754

According to this statement, people have to obey just law and disobey unjust law. In my opinion,although it is true that people should hold different attitude toward different laws(有点歧义 the arguer have oversimplified such topic, since judging whether some law is just or not is much more impotent and complicated.

Firstly, whether a law is just or unjust is rarely a straightforward issue. There are many aspects which will influence public's judgments, such as region, religion, class and so on. Apparently, in our country any law have to be obeyed by all the citizens who live in different provinces, and then problems occur. Because of the regional difference, people may hold different opinions about a law. For instance(我这次就没有想到什么例子,呵呵谢谢你的提醒拉), the law of elementary education force parents to send their children to school when they are 6 years old, if they do not allow, they are illegal. In some rich provinces, parents surely obey this, but for many poor farmers, who are not able to afford children’s education fees, it is unfair to claim that they are illegal. In addition, religious element sometimes would also result in people's disagreements toward the same law. For example, people in various beliefs have different definitions of freedom, therefore it is difficult to enact a law about it to satisfy them all. Thus we should not oversimplify such a complex judgments of law.

Secondly, even public own the same attitude toward some laws that they are unjust, disobeying(有名词形式更好) is the last choice to change this situation.(一个我从来不会用的句型, 好啊好啊) Common senses(sense) tells us that if we act against laws, we must be punished. And during such punishments, we cannot do any useful things(有用在什么地方,什么作用最后修饰清楚) while energy and spirit is diminished. What people are able to do to(不是能,是应该吧) improve unfair laws is to be more powerful and make meaningful reforms of those laws. This is the most effective way to practice the intended hope. That is to say, only with rude disobedience will not any advancement be achieved. Being calm and supplicated to make powerful further development of the law with flaws, then persuading public to obey them is the key.

What is more, when persons have agreement with some laws, they should take different actions toward them(总觉得别扭这句话). It is reasonable that people ought to obey just laws, which can restrain people's daily activities and protect most persons' legal rights. (加一个举例子的标志吧,如果不是连举例子的话, 写一个FOR EXAMPLE 或者 ..SERVE AS A GOOD EXAMPLE, 会显的清晰一点)If some person is hurt by others, the criminals must be judged by the court. When the whole society run under efficient law systems, person's common daily life own security which can assure harmony of the whole society. (前面有个In the one hand 岂不更好)In the other hand, when some one(someone) have dissidence of some unjust laws, as mentioned above, they may make wise decisions to express his idea legally and make useful further improvement.

To sum up, any arguments about law is not simple and easy, we cannot make flapped conclusion without cautious consideration and analysis. In such topic, and we cannot go extreme to justify any laws are just or not. Moreover, what is also significant is that precise decisions should be made when different conditions appear. (这句话是有道理的,我觉得写的很好)To obey what is desirable to obey, and to improve what is necessary to be improved.

总的来说楼主这次写的文章要比上次感觉好多拉, 论证的也还算有条理的, 如果能再搜集点资料就好了加点出彩点,其实我觉得我的时间要比大家充分一点, 可以帮忙去搜索整理一点资料的, 是我太不懂事要玩………..
扯远了, 今天我还得做ARGUMENT, 希望楼主越写越好

我常不会用的词 有 impotent. Dissidence, 记住了

liuwenqi24UID: 2141136

谢谢楼上同学的修改,ivy每次都这么仔细:)

我觉得,我的主要问题就在语言和举例上,我自己知道的例子实在是很少呀,555
我也不知道该怎么办啦~~

还有,句式好单一,用词好弱智,哎~~~