Issue50 我的第3篇issue, 谢谢修改

eric_panUID: 2270415

50 "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."

不同意
1）对于一些学科，教员外出工作对教员本身几乎没有什么好处，如科研
2）对学校来说，也是一种资源的浪费
3）承认对一些工程性强的科目，是有一定的好处

As greater number of people enrolled in colleges and universities during the past few years, how to improve the quality of instruction became a key problem of to education. In this issue, the author asserts that all faculties should spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. However, in my point of view, except some engineering courses, working outside is not very necessary to other courses.

Firstly, to some disciplines, working outside do little help to improve the ability of faculty members. One relevant instance involves the science research. In many colleges and universities, professors always working in their laboratories, and they familiar with the surroundings which ensure experiments carried on smoothly. Moreover, in many situations, colleges and universities' condition is more suitable for science research. We can easily prove this point from many scientific discoveries or advancements deriving from universities or colleges. Thereby, if these professors were asked to working outside the academic world, which would do little help to their academic ability, and even be counterproductive.

Secondly, compulsory working in professions outside academic world may cause the college and university to lose their outstanding faculty member. If more time was spend outside college and university, then less time was invested in teaching students, and this is a great waste of intellectual resources. Consider, in a university, if most of its faculty members were working outside, then who would teach and direct students, let alone the improvement of the quality of instruction. One leader of my university once said that (and I paraphrased):”If the entire faculty member run a company, and asked students to work in it like a staffer, our university would not be a university anymore.” This tell us colleges and universities should not switch emphasis from teaching to other points, thereby, compulsory working outside will be nothing but harm the quality of instruction.

Admittedly, to some academic area such as engineering, faculty members should be encouraged to work outside for some time in order to better orient instruction to students for future career. Only going outside, can they find what is the most needed, what is the difficulty, and where is the direction? As we know, one of the purposes of education is to train suitable workers for society, so, inevitablely, when the faculties are conscious of what is the need of a society, they can do much better. For example, many multinational companies found many laboratories with colleges or universities. In this way, not only the company can get benefits from academic intellectual resource, but also the universities and colleges can get benefits from the collaboration.

In sum, whether required faculties to spend time working outside the academic world should be a case-by-case matter. It should depend on the attribute of the subjects. And for colleges and universities, it is a good idea to set up laboratory with companies collaboratively.

lilyquUID: 2214568

50 "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."

不同意
1）对于一些学科，教员外出工作对教员本身几乎没有什么好处，如科研
2）对学校来说，也是一种资源的浪费
3）承认对一些工程性强的科目，是有一定暮么?br />
As greater number of people enrolled in colleges and universities during[in] the past few years, how to improve the quality of instruction became a key problem of to education. In this issue, the author asserts that all faculties should spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. However, in my point of view, except some engineering courses, working outside is not very necessary to other courses.

Firstly, to some disciplines, working outside do little help to improve the ability of faculty members. One relevant instance involves the science research. In many colleges and universities, professors always working in their laboratories, and they familiar with the surroundings which ensure experiments carried on smoothly. Moreover, in many situations, colleges and universities' condition is more suitable for science research. We can easily prove this point from many scientific discoveries or advancements deriving from universities or colleges. Thereby, if these professors were asked to working outside the academic world, which would do little help to their academic ability, and even be counterproductive.

Secondly, compulsory working in professions outside academic world may cause the college and university to lose their outstanding faculty member. If more time was spend outside college and university, then less time was invested in teaching students, and this is a great waste of intellectual resources. Consider, in a university, if most of its faculty members were working outside, then who would teach and direct students, let alone the improvement of the quality of instruction. One leader of my university once said that (and I paraphrased):”If the entire faculty member run a company, and asked students to work in it like a staffer, our university would not be a university anymore.” This tell us colleges and universities should not switch emphasis from teaching to other points, thereby, compulsory working outside will be nothing but harm the quality of instruction.[主题句资源浪费，在段落中间不明确，容易让人误会主题是大学失去杰出老师]

Admittedly, to some academic area such as engineering, faculty members should be encouraged to work outside for some time in order to better orient instruction to students for future career. Only going outside, can they find what is the most needed, what is the difficulty, and where is the direction? As we know, one of the purposes of education is to train suitable workers for society, so, inevitablely, when the faculties are conscious of what is the need of a society, they can do much better. For example, many multinational companies found many laboratories with colleges or universities. In this way, not only the company can get benefits from academic intellectual resource, but also the universities and colleges can get benefits from the collaboration.

In sum, whether required faculties to spend time working outside the academic world should be a case-by-case matter. It should depend on the attribute of the subjects. And for colleges and universities[practical subject], it is a good idea to set up laboratory with companies collaboratively.


我改过你的argument,找了好多我认为不合适的地方，两篇issue我都看了，几乎没找到什么地方要改的，感觉不像一个人写的:D