issue4 [Synergy小组]ostrich第12次作业

ostrich1986UID: 2238177

4 "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
任何领域要取得重大进展，都需要外领域者的知识和经验。
同意
1 同意：学科单一是对发展不利的 在生化领域 开始人们没有很好的提纯设备来进行更进一步的研究,直到Mass Spectrometer 的引入,他利用电磁的原理进行不同原子和分子之间的分离,他比当时的提纯设备精度高出千倍以上,这样就很好地推动了生化的发展.
2 同意  学科间的交叉 融合会为我们提供更多的利益 生物和医学 基因工程
3 否定  不能过分融合 曾经所有的科学都包括在哲学 但是后来因为发展才细分为许多学科 细分之后才能更好的发展
Is it true that the field of study will advance significantly whether outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to the realm, as the speaker asserts? I fundamentally agree with the speaker insofar as biochemistry and medicine. Yet, strictly followed, what is harmful for the certain discipline is that it involves several branches of knowledge.
On the one hand, no area of intellectual research can evolve rapidly and adequately without exact and faultless measures and theory which are designed and unearthed in other realms. For example, it is accurate results that the Mass Spectrometer-a device which is rooted in the theory of electromagnetism in physics-provides, so that it is used generally in the field of biochemistry. Biochemists can separate various atoms and molecules with the support of the equipment, in which way they will get the consequence that is thousands times more precise than before. Only by analyzing and comparing these more specific consequences, biochemists will extend biochemistry into a soaring level. It is hard to imagine that without the Mass Spectrometer, how the biochemistry develops forward. In a word, the development of a certain subject should rely on the support of advanced knowledge and experience in other areas.
On the other hand, it is because of the immeasurable benefit provided by the interdisciplinary science that we should place emphasis on the relationship and between different subjects. To support this statement, genetic engineering is a convincing case at point. That is a biological measure of changing DNA of cells according to the human will in order to serve us human beings well. For instance, in the realm of medicine, doctors and technicians can cure and solve many diseases and problems which cannot be settled by traditional medicine before with the support of the technology. Under the help of genetic engineering, it is possible to regenerate tissues or organs to heal those which are damaged in accidents. Under the help of genetic engineering, it is probably to obtain numerous medicines which can remedy human efficiently. Genetic engineering can broaden research field in others subjects. In short, some interdisciplinary sciences can provide human beings abundant benefits so that we should place emphasis on them.
However, in the epoch of the rapid technological change leading to increasing the complexity of science, social and scientific development call for detailed rules to define and distinguish various discipline, but not some general subjects. I follow the reasoning that in the ear of Aristotle, almost all sciences, such as mathematics, logic, natural sciences and etc. are entire included in the philosophy. However, as researches are operating in a more depth level, then they become intricate; many subjects are apart from philosophy to extend highly and superiorly. Besides, for the finite time and vigor of human, it is impossible that human become professional in a realm which involves several branches of science. Therefore, we should define and distinguish different sciences into detailed braches.
To sum up, it is essential to lay emphasis on the combination of knowledge and experience in different realms. At the same time, for an effective progress, we should sort science in various branches scientifically and systematically.

hyt0303UID: 2254178

我感觉你的第三个论点好像不是很可行。路甬祥有一片文章是讲交叉学科的，他提到科学发展在古代是整体性的统一在哲学中，到了近代有了细分的学科，但是它们之间没有很好的联系起来。直到二战以后，各个学科之间开始走向融合，因为科学本身就具有整体性。只有整合在一起才能更好地做研究，你用学科细粉来论证的话，是不是有一种返回到十九世纪的味道？也许是因为我看了那片文章所以受到影响了吧。

hyt0303UID: 2254178

Is it true that the field of study will advance significantly whether（这里你用双重疑问了，好像不对阿only under the condition that） outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to the realm, as the speaker asserts? I fundamentally agree with the speaker insofar as (in the fields of) biochemistry and medicine. Yet, strictly followed, what is harmful for the certain discipline is that it involves several branches of knowledge.这句话没有看懂

On the one hand, no area of intellectual research can evolve rapidly and adequately without exact and faultless measures and theory which are designed and unearthed in other realms. For example, it is accurate results that the Mass Spectrometer-a device which is rooted in the theory of electromagnetism in physics-provides, so that it is used generally in the field of biochemistry. Biochemists can separate various atoms and molecules with the support of the equipment, in which way they will get the consequence that is thousands times more precise than before. （这段话好晕阿，感觉这样写就可以了吧。it is by the mass spectrometer, a device invented according to the theory of electromagnetism in physics-provides, that Biochemists can separate various atoms and molecules, in which way they will get the consequence that is thousands times more precise than before.）Only by analyzing and comparing these more specific consequences, biochemists will extend biochemistry into a soaring level. （这句话应该是只有得到了更精确的研究数据，科学家才可能在生化领域进行更深入的研究，从而推动之发展。感觉你这里少讲了一层意思。） It is hard to imagine that without the Mass Spectrometer, how the biochemistry develops forward. In a word, the development of a certain subject should rely on the support of advanced knowledge and experience in other areas.

On the other hand, it is because of the immeasurable benefit provided(given) by the interdisciplinary science that we should place emphasis on the relationship and between different subjects （这句话什么意思？）. To support this statement, genetic engineering is a convincing case at point. That is a biological measure of changing DNA of cells according to the human will in order to serve us human beings well. For instance, in the realm of medicine, doctors and technicians can cure and solve many diseases and problems which cannot be settled by traditional medicine before with the support of the technology. Under the help of genetic engineering, it is possible to regenerate tissues or organs to heal those which are damaged in accidents. Under the help of genetic engineering, it is probably（probable） to obtain numerous medicines which can remedy human efficiently. Genetic engineering can broaden research field in others (other) subjects. In short, some interdisciplinary sciences can provide human beings abundant benefits so that we should place emphasis on them.这一段我都没怎么看明白：P不好意思~~

However, in the epoch of the rapid technological change leading to increasing the complexity of science, social and scientific development call for detailed rules to define and distinguish various discipline, but not some general subjects. I follow the reasoning that in the ear of Aristotle, almost all sciences, such as mathematics, logic, natural sciences and etc. are entire included in the philosophy. However, as researches are operating in a more depth level, then they become intricate; many subjects are apart from philosophy to extend highly and superiorly. Besides, for the finite time and vigor of human, it is impossible that human become professional in a realm which involves several branches of science. Therefore, we should define and distinguish different sciences into detailed braches. 这一段你的主题是现代科技高速发展需要细致的学科分类，但是你下面的例子用的却是几千年前的。这个在时间上是不是错位了。

To sum up, it is essential to lay emphasis on the combination of knowledge and experience in different realms. At the same time, for an effective progress, we should sort science in various branches scientifically and systematically.

[ 本帖最后由 hyt0303 于 2007-1-2 11:00 编辑 ]