寄托天下
查看: 1083|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue50 欢迎来拍~留链必回~ [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
164
注册时间
2006-9-7
精华
0
帖子
30
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2007-2-10 14:43:56 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."

有保留的同意:有些领域可以要求教员涉及到学校外的职业领域,但要防止其可能带来的危害,有些领域则不应该对教员如此要求。
1、  理论研究领域如哲学、历史,在校外没有相关职业与其对口。
2、  而可以用到实践中的科目,如生态学、法律等老师在研究领域外兼职则可以增加学生兴趣,并与实际应用等同步。
3、  但如果老师太侧重校外职业,则会对教学不利。

Should all faculty be demanded to spent time working outside the academic world in professions related to what they teach so that to improve the quality of instruction, as the speaker maintains? In my point of view, the speaker over generalize the necessity for all the numbers of faculty to take part in occupations in outside world. And more importantly, the speaker overlooks the possible drawbacks as a result of such a claim.

To begin with, concerning about engaging in professions relevant to the courses the members of faculty teach, one would question whether all the members of the faculty could possibly find such professions. Some realms of academic world, such as philosophy and history, the knowledge from neither areas could be applied directly to the modern industrialized world. Were there no professions related to the courses taught by some members of the faculty, how could it be possible that they spend time working outside the college and university. It is far better off, therefore, for the benefit of both the students and these part of faculty, that these docents or professors to simply concentrate on the academic field they are indulging in, rather than trying to take jobs related to what they teach.

Although in some realms of academic world, as stated above, it is not appropriate for faculty to engaging in work outside the college and university, in some areas, it is possible, even necessary for the related faculty to spend time on professions relevant to the area they teach. One vivid example comes from the ecological professor of my own. As he joins his research domain to the pressing problems faced by today's society, our interest in ecology has soared at an all time high. It is known to almost everyone today that the earth is as risk, great partly as the result of the activities of human beings. Merely knowledge in books and labs cannot solve these problems. Our teacher produces a substitute fuel for petrol we mainly use today, and many managers and businessmen are interested in these subjects or already have reached a contrast with my teacher. In fact, what we learn at class cannot equip us well enough to plunge in work or research that we may set about to undertake tomorrow. By setting an empirical example, our teacher shows us how to embrace knowledge with utilization, boost our passion for studying ecology.

As for some other areas, such as law and computer science, on balance I agree that it is useful for faculty major in these realms of academia to spend time working outside school. Keeping in touch with the work in social life, the faculty can provide students with the most up-to-date information which can both enlarge the students' knowledge and provide current trends on the situations of job market.

However, requiring faculty spending time working outside the academic world has its own drawback, which without addressed probably may ruin the objective of the requirement. As my teacher as I mentioned above, he is sometimes more inclined to the business than the teaching, and even absent form work at times, as by means of advocating the benefits of his product, he can earn much more money than the university offers. This inevitably leads to the decline in the quality of instruction as last, and the ultimate victims are us, the students.

In sum, the speaker overstates the requirement for all faculty to work outside the academic world. Were the courses are mainly about theories, these faculty should not be required to take jobs outside university. On the other hand, as the courses taught by professors or decants are closely related to the outside college business, it will improve the quality of instruction as long as some possible consequences are well taken care of.

[ 本帖最后由 kexinyupiao 于 2007-2-11 20:03 编辑 ]
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
128
注册时间
2007-2-10
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2007-2-10 23:14:56 |只看该作者

love it

excellent composition

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
482
注册时间
2006-11-1
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2007-2-11 11:21:09 |只看该作者

晕,提纲写得好相似啊

有保留的同意:有些领域可以要求教员涉及到学校外的职业领域,但要防止其可能带来的危害,有些领域则不应该对教员如此要求。1  理论研究领域如哲学、历史,在校外没有相关职业与其对口。2  而可以用到实践中的科目,如生态学、法律等老师在研究领域外兼职则可以增加学生兴趣,并与实际应用等同步。3  但如果老师太侧重校外职业,则会对教学不利。
Should all faculty be demanded to spent time working outside the academic world in professions related to what they teach so that to improve the quality of instruction, as the speaker maintains? In my point of view, the speaker over generalize the necessity for all the numbers of faculty to take part in occupations in outside world.这词不太准确吧,学术界以外And more importantly, the speaker overlooks the possible drawbacks as a result of such a claim.To begin with, concerning about engaging in professions relevant to the courses the members of faculty teach, one would question whether all the members of the faculty could possibly这里有点中式英语表达语法不对的 find such professions. Some realms of academic world, such as philosophy and history, the knowledge from neither areas could be applied directly to the modern industrialized world. Were there no professions related to the courses taught by some members of the faculty, how could it be possible that they spend time working outside the college and university. It is far better off, therefore, for the benefit of both the students and these part of faculty, that these decants or professors to simply concentrate on the academic field they are indulging in, rather than trying to take jobs related to what they teach.Although in some realms of academic world, as stated above, it is not appropriate for faculty to engaging in work outside the college and university, in some areas, it is possible, even necessary for the related faculty to spend time on professions relevant to the area they teach. One vivid example comes from the ecological professor of my own. As he joins his research domain to the pressing problems faced by today's society, our interest in ecology has soared at an all time high. It is known to almost everyone today that the earth is as a risk, great partly as the result of the activities of human beings这句不太理解,地球受人类活动。。。?. Merely knowledge in books and labs cannot solve these problems. Our teacher produces a substitute fuel for petrol we mainly use today, and many managers and businessmen are interested in these subjects or already have reached a contrast with my teacher. In fact, what we learn at class cannot equip us well enough to plunge in work or research that we may set about to undertake tomorrow.写得好 By setting an empirical这词我怎么没想到 example, our teacher shows us how to embrace knowledge with utilization, boost our passion for studying ecology.As for some other areas, such as law and computer science, on balance I agree that it is useful for faculty major in these realms of academia to spend time working outside school. Keeping in touch with the work in social life, the faculty can provide students with the most up-to-date information which can both enlarge the students' knowledge and provide current trends on the situations of job market. However, requiring faculty spending time working outside the academic world has its own drawback, which without addressed probably may ruin the objective of the requirement. As my teacher as I mentioned above, he is sometimes more inclined to the business than the teaching, and even absent form work at times, as by means of advocating the benefits of his product, he can earn much more money than the university offers. This inevitably leads to the decline in the quality of instruction as last, and the ultimate victims are us, the students.In sum, the speaker overstates the requirement觉得这个词不是很准确地表达楼主的意思,楼主应该想说过分强调了其必要性? for all faculty to work outside the academic world. Were the courses are mainly about theories,两个谓语,强调句吧 these faculty should not be required to take jobs outside university. On the other hand, as the courses taught by professors or decants are closely related to the outside college business, it will improve the quality of instruction as long as some possible consequences are well taken care of.点明是不良结果回清楚点吧。

头一次改楼主的作业,有不到之处还希望指出啊
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=607944&page=1&extra=page%3D2#pid1769700895
温和的坚持,并且微笑

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue50 欢迎来拍~留链必回~ [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue50 欢迎来拍~留链必回~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-607526-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部