Issue4 第一篇，希望大家指教

maiqidiliwuUID: 2119412

TOPIC: ISSUE4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
WORDS: 420          TIME: 上午 1:35:00          DATE: 2007-2-11

   Outsiders' knowledge and experience is very helpful ,yet not necessary  for the prosperity of a field of study.
   Of course borrowing knowledge and experience from other fields of study has indeed triggered significant breakthrough in many subjects, such as the biochemistry, molecular biology. Now days interconnected fields are experiencing mutual growth and prosperity. Without supporting advances in calculus, the field of economic would never have seen the booming growth of its last 20 years. Mathematics helped convert economics from a qualitative, speculative field to a quantitative, definitive one.
    But such a phenomenon by no means indicate that all fields of study can make their frog-leaps  only though sharing academic light of outsiders. In fact, there are abundant factors contributing to the advancement, such as the demand of the society, a genius's flash of wisdom.
    As we all know, we are in an era of the information thanks to the Internet. And at beginning it was wholly designed to meet the need of the DoD rather than was motived by outsiders’ knowledge and experience. At the height of the Cold War the DoD wanted a command-and-control network that could survive a nuclear war. At that time, all military communications used the public telephone network, which is considered vulnerable. So the experts of computer science build a prototype called ARPA. Continually universities found its great power in sharing information, then it was the computer experts, students, rather than professionals of other fields, made a significant advancement in the computer science. They connected the networks in many universities, conquered the technical difficulties. With those computer experts' efforts, we eventually step into the information era. In this case, the significant advancement in computer science is motived by the need of DoD and developed mainly by the efforts of the computer experts.
    Additionally considering some field with a long history, especially the theoretical ones, we can find some examples opposite to the issue. Take physics for example, Newton's Law of Gravitation and Einstein's Theory of Relativity are utterly genius' flash of wisdom, little of which is borrowed from other subjects.
    In conclusion, reason for the significant advancement in a specific field is complex and various. It is improper to consider certain one, such as the knowledge and experience of outsiders mentioned in the issue, as the crucial and decisive element to all advancements. Different fields have different features so that we have to make specific analyses before we decide which element contributes most to the advancement. In fact even in the same field, the reason for each advancement is hardly the same ones.  
      

[ 本帖最后由 maiqidiliwu 于 2007-2-12 01:30 编辑 ]

showerqiUID: 2301650

Outsiders' knowledge and experience is very helpful ,yet not necessary  for the prosperity of a field of study.
   Of course borrowing knowledge and experience from other fields of study has indeed triggered significant breakthrough in many subjects, such as the biochemistry, molecular biology. Now days (nowadays) interconnected fields are experiencing mutual growth and prosperity. Without supporting advances in calculus, the field of economic would never have seen the booming growth of its last 20 years. Mathematics helped convert economics from a qualitative, speculative field to a quantitative, definitive one.
    But such a phenomenon by no means indicate that all fields of study can make their frog-leaps  only though sharing academic light of outsiders. In fact, there are abundant factors contributing to the advancement, such as the demand of the society, a genius's flash of wisdom.
    As we all know, we are in an era of the information thanks to the Internet. And at beginning it was wholly designed to meet the need of the DoD rather than was motived by outsiders’ knowledge and experience. At the height of the Cold War the DoD wanted a command-and-control network that could survive a nuclear war. At that time, all military communications used the public telephone network, which is considered vulnerable. So the experts of computer science build a prototype called ARPA. Continually universities found its great power in sharing information, then it was the computer experts, students, rather than professionals of other fields, made a significant advancement in the computer science. They connected the networks in many universities, conquered the technical difficulties. With those computer experts' efforts, we eventually step into the information era. In this case, the significant advancement in computer science is motived by the need of DoD and developed mainly by the efforts of the computer experts.
    Additionally considering some field with a long history, especially the theoretical ones, we can find some examples opposite to the issue. Take physics for example, Newton's Law of Gravitation and Einstein's Theory of Relativity are utterly genius' flash of wisdom, little of which is borrowed from other subjects.
    In conclusion, reason for the significant advancement in a specific field is complex and various. It is improper to consider certain one, such as the knowledge and experience of outsiders mentioned in the issue, as the crucial and decisive element to all advancements. Different fields have different features so that we have to make specific analyses before we decide which element contributes most to the advancement. In fact even in the same field, the reason for each advancement is hardly the same ones.

修改意见：1开头显得单薄
               2平衡观点中其他学科的知识经验的积极作用写的有些少。


驳论的例子写的太好了，借鉴一下^_^

[ 本帖最后由 showerqi 于 2007-2-11 22:37 编辑 ]

maiqidiliwuUID: 2119412

请问开头应该怎么个思路？

抱歉没找到你的文章

此外
觉得正面的例子应该怎么丰满点？

因为我觉得我主要持反对偏多的意见所以没有多写这方面的

感谢你的评论

欢迎大家来拍～～～

maiqidiliwuUID: 2119412

第一天了i a 各一篇暴露很多问题
大家多多指教