issue17 [076G－背水一战小组]duduhaha的作业，求拍。

duduhahaUID: 2273118

ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

提纲：

1. 指出我们不能轻易地将法律归为正义，非正义。对我们认为不对的法律我们应该采取正确的措施改进而不是抵制。

2. 指出法律的正义与否可能与个人立场，兴趣有关。

3. 指出法律一旦通过，就具有了最高权利，不能随便冒犯。

4.指出我们能通过正确的手段来改进我们认为不合理的手段。

5.总结。

Could the laws just be classified into two types: just and unjust? And, do we have a responsibility to obey just laws and disobey unjust ones? The speaker claims so.
In my opinion, however, we could not classify the laws simply like this and it is wise to take proper procedure to improve unreasonable laws rather than resist them
blindly.

Firstly, whether a law is just or unjust depends on one's personal interests and  value system. It is likely that a group of people think a law is just to them but another
group do not think so. Take the drug problem for example, some countries, especially those who are heavily suffering from drugs, call for international laws and severe
punishment to the crimes, whereas a few countries will not like to do so because they benefit a lot from drug smuggle. Also the law will result in discrepancy when it
comes to the personal affairs. For instance, many people have prejudice for gayness but some regard it as their free choice. It is hard to establish laws to solve this problem indeed so that only some countries such as Canada have laws to protect the people of gayness.  Thus, as the world does not only contain white and black, laws are not limited in just ones and unjust ones easily.

Secondly, once the laws are passed, they have the highest authority so that no one could be encouraged to resist them. Otherwise the whole world will fall into a chaos
sooner or later. For instance, a man who killed another for revenging the death of his father would receive his penalty though it seems just for him to do so. If he receives no penalty for his action, it will urge more and more people to revenge blindly. In this view, the law's authority should not be challenged rashly.

It is not permitted to violate the laws, however, it does not mean that we cannot do anything to correct the injustice and improve the laws. On the one hand, most countries, especially democracy societies, encourage the amendment and improvement for the laws according to situations and people's needs. On the other hand, people who think the laws are not just to them could appeal to the legislators to correct the inequity of the laws rather than break the unjust laws rashly. Let us return to people of gayness, they should make their effort to request the government to better the laws for their rights.

In sum, though we have rights to judge laws in our own opinion, no one should  disobey them blindly. And we should fight against unjust laws through legislation procedure rather than resist them as we wish.

lourryUID: 2157624

Could the laws just be classified into two types: just and unjust? And, do we have a responsibility to obey just laws and disobey unjust ones? The speaker claims so.
In my opinion, however, we could not classify the laws simply like this and it is wise to take proper procedure to improve unreasonable laws rather than resist them
blindly.

Firstly, whether a law is just or unjust depends on one's personal interests and  value system.（不要太绝对呵，最好有限定：in most cases,...,to a great extent, depends on） It is likely that a group of people think a law is just to them but another
group do not think so.(呵呵，用think可能有点简单了，可以换点别的词汇：consider,hold the view that,contend等等) Take the drug problem for example, some countries, especially those who are heavily suffering from drugs, call for international laws and severe
punishment to the crimes, whereas a few countries will not like to do so because they benefit a lot from drug smuggle. Also the law will result in discrepancy when it
comes to the personal affairs. For instance, many people have prejudice for gayness but some regard it as their free choice. It is hard to establish laws to solve this problem indeed so that only some countries such as Canada have laws to protect the people of gayness.  Thus, as the world does not only contain white and black, laws are not limited in just ones and unjust ones easily.（呵呵，这个比喻不错呵，稀罕中）

Secondly, once the laws are passed, they have the highest authority so that no one could be encouraged to resist them. Otherwise the whole world will fall into a chaos
sooner or later. For instance（重复出现了呵, Just image that）, a man who killed another for revenging the death of his father would receive his penalty though it seems just for him to do so. If he receives no penalty for his action, it will urge more and more people to revenge blindly（重复出现了,recklessly）. In this view, the law's authority should not be challenged rashly.(感觉论证不够充分。)

It is not permitted to violate the laws, however, it does not mean that we cannot do anything to correct the injustice and improve the laws. On the one hand, most countries, especially democracy societies, encourage the amendment and improvement for the laws according to situations and people's needs. On the other hand, people who think（重复出现呵） the laws are not just to them could appeal to the legislators to correct the inequity of the laws rather than break the unjust laws rashly. Let us return to people of gayness, they should make their effort to request the government to better the laws for their rights.

In sum, though we have rights to judge laws in our own opinion, no one should  disobey them blindly（重复呵）. And we should fight against unjust laws through legislation procedure rather than resist them as we wish.


总体来说，结构比较清晰。
但是感觉论证不够充分呵。
词汇以及句式的多样性还需加强呵。
一起努力吧，加油！~