issue38 [076G飞跃小组]joyce8512第二次作业

joyce8512UID: 2263806

TOPIC: ISSUE38 - "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
因果型提纲：
正负负——不能学到一样多的知识，阅读仍然重要。。
1．  电视有优势。
画面感强，视听合一。例子：奥运会转播。
时效性好, latest.
2．  书本有电视不具备的优势。
阅读利于人思考，看电视阻碍人思考。(详细阐述)
例子：历史事件。只有通过阅读了解真相，并产生自己的观点。
3．书本有电视不具备的其他优势。（各点简单叙述）
随身携带，portable。不受电、环境、地点等客观因素影响。
书是非线性传播，可以选择性阅读。看电视是被动接收。
书可保存，重复阅读。
字数：500          终于上5字头啦！！~~

Is reading books still important as it once was in the age of television? The speaker claims that the importance of reading books has declined significantly as a result of the fact that people can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. From my perspective, it is true that televisions are superior to books under some circumstances; however, books are more advantageous than televisions in most aspects when it comes to learning.

Admittedly, television is an appropriate way to have access to certain types of knowledge and events thanks to its characteristic of being lively and timely. Take Olympic Games for an example, by watching the vivid images and background sounds in the field through television, we can better appreciate the competition as well as perceive the same exciting atmosphere during the process of competing. What is more, it seems that we can get acquaintance to the latest news by watching television rather than by reading books or newspapers. Simply put Olympic Games for an example again, if one is desirous to know the results of track and field, or the ranking of the medals of his or her countries, at first hand, then turning on the television will be the advisable choice. In one word, television has some merit in spreading the lately events fast and live.

However, on the other hand, one can learn most profound knowledge by reading books but by watching television which makes it significant. As we know, television is controlled by the production manager and other certain personnel in TV stations. Hence, the programs are inevitably influenced by the ideas and interests of the producers, which is adverse for us to comprehend the facts. The historical event is a case in point. By reading books, one can find out what the history actually is and produce deeply thoughts and judgments without any other influences. In short, reading books is beneficial to learning, especially it terms of deep thinking.

In addition, books also have several inherent superiorities to television, which is neglected by the speaker. First, books are far more portable than television sets so that they are suitable for commuters. Second, books do not cling to the environment, such as electricity, signal, altitude and so forth—all of which have much to do with televisions. Third, one can choose the order of reading while it is unlikely to change the sequences of programs freely with reference to the television. Also, one can keep books as collections and read them repeatedly, which is not available in television. With such advantages, it is hard to say that reading books are not of importance as it was nowadays.

All in all, in my point of view, although television has its merit concerning certain events; however, reading books is more superior to watching television as a facility of learning knowledge result from its irreplaceable benefit to stimulate original and insightful thinking. Therefore, reading books is, and will always be, significant in people's life.

[ 本帖最后由 joyce8512 于 2007-2-26 13:30 编辑 ]

disyooUID: 2223964

Is reading books still important as it once was in the age of television? The speaker claims that the importance of reading books has declined significantly as a result of the fact that people can learn as much by watching television as they can learn by reading books. From my perspective, it is true that televisions are superior to books under some circumstances; however, books are more advantageous than televisions in most aspects when it comes to learning.

Admittedly, television is an appropriate way to have access to certain types of knowledge and events thanks to its characteristic of being lively and timely. Take Olympic Games for an example, by watching the vivid images and background sounds in the field through television, we can better appreciate the competition as well as perceive the same exciting atmosphere during the process of competing. What is more, it seems that we can get acquaintance to the latest news by watching television rather than by reading books or newspapers. Simply put Olympic Games for an example again, if one is desirous to know the results of track and field, or the ranking of the medals of his or her countries, at first hand, then turning on the television will be the advisable choice. In one word, television has some merit in spreading the lately events fast and live.没什么可说的，lz的实例和论点很贴切。

However, on the other hand, one can learn most profound knowledge by reading books but by watching television which makes it significant. As we know, television(电视是被你的遥控器控制的，本后面那些人控制的应该是TV programs) is controlled by the production manager and other certain personnel in TV stations. Hence, the programs are inevitably influenced by the ideas and interests of the producers, which is adverse for us to comprehend the facts. The historical event is a case in point. By reading books, one can find out what the history actually is and produce deeply thoughts and judgments without any other influences. In short, reading books is beneficial to learning, especially it terms of deep thinking.

In addition, books also have several inherent superiorities to television, which is neglected by the speaker. First, books are far more portable than television sets so that they are suitable for commuters. Second, reading books do not cling to the environment, such as electricity, signal, altitude and so forth—all of which have much to do with televisions. Third, one can choose the order of reading while it is unlikely to change the sequences of programs freely with reference to the television. Also, one can keep books as collections and read them repeatedly, which is not available in television. With such advantages, it is hard to say that reading books are not of importance as it was nowadays.我觉得这些例子在说书好而不是说读书好，这样就有点跑题，题目说的是读书的好处。当然，我说的也可能有些牵强……lz自己想想怎么权衡一下会更好。

All in all, in my point of view, although television has its merit concerning certain events; however, reading books is more superior to watching television as a facility of learning knowledge result from its irreplaceable benefit to stimulate original and insightful thinking. Therefore, reading books is, and will always be, significant in people’s life.

真的很好， 看你的文章也能让自己的文章进步许多。我觉得你与研结构非常有条理，是按时写的么？太牛了

你是在那里上课啊？我也是修锐 在农职校区

拍拍这个吧：
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-615189-1-1.html

joyce8512UID: 2263806

万泉河校区~寒假班
木有限时，限了根本写不出来~
谢谢鼓励，加油~