生如夏花小组第五次作业

PapillonFoxUID: 2171945

Barron test2 integrated task

In the reading passage, the author tries to demonstrate that the Turing Test does have rational and logical aspects in showing computer can think itself at first appearance. However, the professor, in the lecture, reveals that it lends little credible support for the author's assertion.

On one hand, Turing Test is designed in such a model. People are requested to interact with something in a room, and they need to ask some problems to the computer. Then, the computer would feedback their answers. If the tester make a mistake in distinguish the answers come from a human or a machine, it would be thought that the computer can think. But another example in the lecture by a philosopher does not think so. If English speakers are given more information about the question in the Chinese room, they would answer the questions. It just challenges the Turing Test and indicates speakers only make a responsibility but truly understand questions.

On the other hand, someone establish an award to those designers that their computer could pass the Turing Test. Nevertheless, modern technology could design complex input to acting the problem. So, if the computer passes the test, it also has less meaning. The computer could not reflect the basic question of human being.

森林116UID: 2272614

In the reading passage, the author tries to demonstrate that the Turing Test does have rational and logical aspects in showing computer can think itself at first appearance (有点怪啊,可以这样说吧:Turing Test does show computer can think itself at first appearance in rational and logical aspects,,不过你把at first appearance 和in rational and logical aspects都听出来了很PF啊!!). However, the professor, in the lecture, reveals that it lends little credible support (有保留,很好的语气措词啊~) for the author's assertion.

On one hand, Turing Test is designed in such a model. People are requested to interact with something in a room, and they need to ask some problems to the computer. Then, the computer would feedback their answers. If the tester make a mistake in distinguish the answers come from a human or a machine, it would be thought that the computer can think. But another example in the lecture by a philosopher does not think so. If English speakers are given more information about the question in the Chinese room, they would answer the questions. It just challenges the Turing Test and indicates speakers only make a responsibility but truly understand questions.(分析的很到位,只是提出小小建议,你在复述材料内容时最好说下in reading passage之类的,,,,显的更加条例清晰些.个人意见)

On the other hand, someone establish an award to those designers that their computer could pass the Turing Test. Nevertheless, modern technology could design complex input to acting the problem. So, if the computer passes the test, it also has less meaning. The computer could not reflect the basic question of human being. (恩,我印象中不记得award了...但是觉得它和computer的complex有何联系呢??希望能再讨论)

总的来说很不错啊,,,是我学习的榜样!!!恩,加油!!!!