Issue70 [Victors小组]2I1A互改作业

njuzhshaoUID: 2258118

题目：ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

1．新手的优势
2．新手的劣势
3．老手的优势


The author advocates that for any enterprise, the surest path to success to revitalize through changing its leader, and even concrete period are suggested, that is five years-- for any profession, as the author asserts. I do not agree with the speaker, for in many fields, a longer period of leadership may benefits more.

I concede that there are several advantages of frequent changing leaders in many fields, as the author advocates. Inaugural always abounds in inspiration, for merely the fresh air that a new leader brings could, in some degree, revitalize a team. And what follows a new leader's coming may be some new ways and means to deal with the problems that the organization is facing, from which breakthroughs may result. Without stereotype in mind, a new leader has a better chance to reevaluate the situation of the organization or his\her stuff, which help to prevents unjustified bias from influencing his\her decisions. What is more, audacity is thought more likely to be a virtue of a new leader.

However, disadvantages are equally obvious to see if an organization prevents any of its leader to keep a relatively longer leadership. Leader under such a system may be prevented by too short a tenure from being familiar enough with his\her own position and work, which then limits the contribution he\she should have done to the organization. This means a waste in talent and ability. Things may be worse when it comes to politics, as it may happen if a peacockish official finds five year too short to earn a loud achievement in his post, a preference toward specious projects is aroused. Several cases have been reported in China, where mayors are changing frequently; many skyscrapers, squares and even colossuses that are costly but not of such utility have been built as achievements, while projects that will really solve serious social problems are left with short of money result from that. Besides bureaucracy, irresponsibility coming from frequently changing may play a important role in it. So, a system that prevents its leader to keep longer leadership is somewhat problematic.

Actually, an old leader with valuable experience sometimes can perform a better job. After all, their experience gives better advises in many cases. Some long-tern projects can be continuous running free of abortion brought by a possible new preference of a new leader, and only through a continuous process like this can long-term projects achieve their initial goals, which can benefits the organization and even people usually far more than those short-term ones. Compared with a new one, an old leader often has a virtue of soberness, which can keep the organization away from needless risks.

To sum up, though revitalization through renew the leader every short period has several advantages like creativity and audacity, consider the possible disadvantages and risks it brings, an experienced leader may perform a better job. A wiser system should take this into consideration and a reasonable longer tenure should be provided.

gyyxUID: 2290150

Issue70 [Victors小组]2I1A互改作业
题目：ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

1．新手的优势
2．新手的劣势
3．老手的优势


The author advocates that for any enterprise, the surest path to success to revitalize through changing its leader, and even concrete period are suggested, that is five years-- for any profession, as the author asserts. I do not agree with the speaker, for in many fields, a longer period of leadership may benefits more.

I concede that there are several advantages of frequent changing leaders in many fields, as the author advocates. Inaugural always abounds in inspiration, for merely the fresh air that a new leader brings could, in some degree, revitalize a team. And what follows a new leader's coming may be some new ways and means to deal with the problems that the organization is facing, from which breakthroughs may result. Without stereotype in mind, a new leader has a better chance to reevaluate the situation of the organization or his\her stuff, which help to prevents unjustified bias from influencing his\her decisions. What is more, audacity is thought more likely to be a virtue of a new leader.

However, disadvantages are equally obvious to see if an organization prevents any of its leaders to keep a relatively longer leadership. Leader under such a system may be prevented by too short a tenure from being familiar enough with his\her own position and work, which then limits the contribution he\she should have done to the organization. This means a waste in talent and ability. Things may be worse when it comes to politics, as it may happen if a peacockish official finds five year too short to earn a loud achievement in his post, a preference toward specious projects is aroused. Several cases have been reported in China, where mayors are changing frequently; many skyscrapers, squares and even colossuses that are costly but not of such utility have been built as achievements, while projects that will really solve serious social problems are left with short of money result from that. Besides bureaucracy, irresponsibility coming from frequently changing may play a important role in it. So, a system that prevents its leader to keep longer leadership is somewhat problematic.

Actually, an old leader with valuable experience sometimes can perform a better job. After all, their experience gives better advises in many cases. Some long-tern projects can be continuous running free of abortion brought by a possible new preference of a new leader, and only through a continuous process like this can long-term projects achieve their initial goals, which can benefits the organization and even people usually far more than those short-term ones. Compared with a new one, an old leader often has a virtue of soberness, which can keep the organization away from needless risks.

To sum up, though revitalization through renew the leader every short period has several advantages like creativity and audacity, consider the possible disadvantages and risks it brings, an experienced leader may perform a better job. A wiser system should take this into consideration and a reasonable longer tenure should be provided.
没有就具体的领域展开，只是对题目的第二句话进行论证，论证是比较全面的。写完看过些例文，都对领域进行了展开，不知道不展开成不成，建议LZ搜下GT精华。

njuzhshaoUID: 2258118

说的很到位啊,自己感觉也是没有展开显得很单薄，谢啦，好像该叫姐姐吧。