- 最后登录
- 2009-12-7
- 在线时间
- 31 小时
- 寄托币
- 118
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2007-4-27
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 102
- UID
- 2332310

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 118
- 注册时间
- 2007-4-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
|
185"Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."
word:542
With the development of technology and civilization, more and more exposure of scandals is reported by media. So are these scandals beneficial for our society as the argument asserts? I agree that scandals can be useful in many cases to reveal the inner problem of community or society. Nevertheless, some scandals schemed to attract public attentions are always insignificant and meaningless and scandals even could distract too many attentions and energy from public so that some more important issues are ignored.
On the one hand, it is undisputable that scandals could call public attentions to some political and academic problems which are easily ignored or concealed from public. The problems will come out with the exposure of scandals, therefore we can make efforts to solve them in order to make progress. The persuasive modern example is the Watergate scandal, which the Nixon government spares no effort to conceal from public at first. Since the scandal has caused wide public concern, the illegal activities are exposed leading to the retirement of the former president. Ultimately, this affair enhances the scrutiny of government behavior by public, which benefits the society. Another example is falsity by a famous professor in Shanghai JiaoTong University in china. This kind of academic falsity, which is so professional that only a few experts can figure out, always would be omitted by public. But, when it was revealed as a scandal, the public concern will result in the thorough examination of the false behavior. It is useful for scandal to function of surveillance on many areas of society, in which way the reformer or speaker could not do.
On the other hand, no one can deny the fact that some scandals are schemed to attract public attention on purpose, which is useless or even harmful for society. As I know, in entertainment industry, it is even considered to be a shortcut to enhance one's popularity. Just like the superstar Britney Spears, she has divorced twice. It is ridiculous that one of her marriages maintained only 51 hours. And the singer Janet Jackson bared her breast in nationwide performance. These behaviors call public attention only for utilizing people's curiosity. Nothing they are about the society. Furthermore, it is expressing a false idea that people can pay any moral price in order to obtain wealth and popularity, which is no worse. Therefore, we should refuse to pay attention to those useless or even harmful scandals.
In addition, in some cases, scandals can call too many attentions from public, which causes less public energy on other urgent or significant aspects. For example, not long ago, there was a school shooting in Virginia Tech University, which shocked the whole America and even the universities in other nations. All new development of this matter causes wild public concern. Many preventive methods are provided by various people. But, when comforting those families of death, we think less about the shooter and his family, who are also victims in this affaire.
In sum, scandal is like a two-blade sword, which can not only contribute to perfecting the social system and supervising the social and political behavior, but also is of no use, even do harm to society. However, all of these lies on how we treat scandals.
[ 本帖最后由 lilumilu 于 2008-1-17 20:16 编辑 ] |
|