- 最后登录
- 2012-9-26
- 在线时间
- 1 小时
- 寄托币
- 150
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-30
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 78
- UID
- 2453478

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 150
- 注册时间
- 2008-1-30
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
发表于 2008-2-14 18:56:47
|显示全部楼层
ARGUMENT45 - The following appeared as an editorial in a wildlife journal.
提纲
1. 猎户的报告并没有支持作者的观点;
2. deer减少和全球变暖的巧合也不能支持作者的观点;
3. deer的减少或许还有其它原因。
In this editorial, the writer claims that the decline in arctic deer populations result from deer being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea. To support this argument, reports from local hunters which show decline in deer being are cited to coincide the global warming trends which have caused the sea ice to melt, for the arctic deer have to keep moving over ice from island to island during the course of a year in order to search for food. However, this argument is flawed in several aspects, and is thus unconvincing.
Firstly, the local hunters' reports which claim that the deer populations are declining lend no support to this argument. The writer fails to provide the details of these reports, for example, how many hunters take part in reporting, the size of areas which these reports mentioned, is this decline short-term or long-term, and so forth, thus they are unconvincing. As these reports are from local hunters, what about other areas? Are the other places also suffering from the same decline of deer being? Perhaps arctic deer just only decline in the writer's region, while they are experiencing prosperity in other regions conversely. So the local hunters' reports cannot substantiate the writer's conclusion.
Secondly, the coincidence between the decline of deer populations and recent global warming trends lend no credibility to the writer's conclusion. As the writer asserts, arctic deer have to keep moving over ice from island to island during the course of a year because their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed, and cold enough, at least some of the year, for the ice to cover the sea separating the islands, allowing the deer to travel over it. However, there is a possible assumption that the global warming may make plants flourish in cold places. The plants are sufficient to feed deer being in these areas, thus there is no need for them to travel any more. In a word, the writer fails to establish a causal relationship between the decline of deer populations and recent global warming trends, therefore, it is unwarranted to claim that he decline in arctic deer populations is the result of deer being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
Even if the deer populations are declining, it is unfairly to assert that the decline is the result of deer being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea. There are many possible reasons which may actually be responsible for the decline of deer being's populations. It is entirely possible that the hunters' excessive hunting is an important reason which lead to the decline of deer being's populations, or the demolishment of deer being's habitat caused by pollution can also be responsible for this decline. Another possible assumption is natural selection for the arctic deer are so choosy on the habitat; they are not adaptable any more. Without ruling out these possible reasons, the writer of this editorial cannot conclude that the decline in arctic deer populations results from deer being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea.
In sum, the writer's conclusion is deteriorated by these flaws, thus is not persuasive. To support the conclusion, the writer should provide the details of the reports which he or she cites; the writer also should clarify the relationship between the decline of deer populations and recent global warming trends; and before the conclusion is made, other possible reason that may be responsible for the decline of the deer populations should be considered. |
|