- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
   
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044. H5 T! G T6 h4 P/ f
( T$ I! {' i9 R% L
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
2 ~7 S D+ n0 o
+ V2 z, l( ]1 FQualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007/ c2 ^# H ?9 ?! q; D( `: E. k( K
7 Z- G) N. P9 {% a: |) J NHarvard University – Architecture
# d% s7 k, O4 ~$ {• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
8 B, Y: ^5 j% a/ Z6 d: ~4 \4 _% d& eand Urban Design }/ @ Y; Y6 @
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
8 J' K r# x( V4 K Y6 @/ t0 L4 }• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth
6 t- g+ d3 T( y$ ]$ ]) X" p, k• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought
( s v! h+ u7 X. u; T3 o: M! v3 q• Breadth of world view* t+ b" j; g6 L/ ^* K1 ^
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice: Z1 N) q) b2 l: t; I
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
, R. k4 L ^( W. |; a, d9 Y• Good balance of theory and practice, very international" _ y9 P7 O- ~- s! W( w7 e/ t
0 U6 D9 q9 `8 r, \* eUniversity of Cincinnati – Interior Design% L( c$ J7 t2 w
• Active connections to the profession
) E. T4 A0 V: P, S• Strength of internship program
T$ z5 E2 m6 R1 S- ^• CIDA similar program, y, t' q: U4 o* I$ [
• Strong technology base
N3 M0 C" l M; C: X) i6 V• Strong overall undergraduate program
: e" B1 o) u* ^( |( k3 E4 C: H• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior% U; l$ c7 Y! y
Design and Architecture co-op
* W' s l+ w- O8 ]3 t5 a# ~* ~6 X• Excellent co-programs
# l2 T( L9 W/ U( ]% S• Direct competition for internships and jobs
6 K# r6 h. l% K: J# A# a9 }9 Z4 K• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students
1 w) k/ _- ~! ^/ C- P. ?- w- ?• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
( F: p- g4 e; E) ]: Q- h& z& F$ Q* X6 i0 p
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
/ [+ z8 y# v4 c• Attention to design and small town urbanism
2 s# u% {- N9 X L# Q! G2 e4 U9 B• Quality of faculty: d9 r8 H- |% [. |
• Students can choose from three tracts of study
9 e9 _" T- ~0 c* ~+ O0 [3 N• Good design research base in sustainable design1 s6 Y5 ~0 e4 K1 |6 E# B) }
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission% x6 {; f" T1 J8 ^# h( l( x
; D' U; N% B' ~
& `1 M- N! O, n: t
Design Programs Most Admired
7 `+ F. J+ ~' S" m% ?7 \" Aby Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
7 t+ L! P+ f" d' K. ?; l! |2 ?9 N( H# K
Architecture
5 ^: U% m" J+ o5 b f1 Harvard University, ^2 P4 _8 [* {2 h& g1 v
2 Auburn University3 _8 p: @1 P& G n1 G
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5 d/ y. }2 g! z7 n4 c, H2 U4 University of Michigan
0 |4 L6 p$ Y" u2 F6 L }1 B8 ?5 Columbia University+ ^0 A6 C' p$ p( {- j3 O: D
6 University of Pennsylvania
/ x2 X' r) P2 c4 d$ F0 ~9 PUniversity of Virginia
2 L" `$ E/ g# g& `2 w# V- ~7 Cornell University( q) A8 s* Q* P( M: r+ p- W# }. G5 b
Georgia Institute of Technology+ H" \+ V3 X6 ]8 l2 s/ `7 q4 U1 J ]
University of California, Berkeley6 ~3 K9 ?: W$ u
University of Minnesota* T- o& n6 p$ m" j5 K, t! G l
Yale University
+ v' z* O" l6 g. N8 B/ Y3 z5 X5 ?- L: p9 L6 ?9 C8 L. ]6 T
Landscape Architecture* J6 j" W0 T4 D! f) |4 s; ~8 h0 L
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
; W- \5 O5 H6 t: W/ R( a5 l' P4 mHarvard University
/ r0 @; {5 J6 t* l3 z oUniversity of Virginia
b! z* G( F6 j3 F4 Pennsylvania State University
1 _: l6 X2 o( j. N3 j- uUniversity of Georgia! j' J' u- Q3 L8 [4 g9 p
University of Pennsylvania
7 R% ^ s" e8 K- m# z! T' X7 California Polytechnic State University,
- J1 C6 ~5 ?5 G4 R7 [+ eSan Luis Obispo. q1 c' e6 y* f0 U! I
Kansas State University
. M# y& m& F6 R1 k4 v3 CMichigan State University
" j4 o7 g) O- A9 ^$ eUniversity of California, Davis+ M3 z+ D6 [% a% z3 {4 t
& }' H( C" m/ h" X8 V$ l& T
Interior Design, A1 I7 `1 e( p4 ^) Y: T- W
1 University of Cincinnati
8 A- Z3 s6 L$ p. E L/ W6 u2 Rhode Island School of Design" D& B9 f8 v' Z0 \
3 Arizona State University1 i: D2 S0 K" I- S3 q) e a$ |
Cornell University' ?. C% N# s# m
Kansas State University
- x# I' D1 I. N* G8 f6 Art Center College of Design
3 S" Z& _. [, J I6 hArt Institute of Chicago4 E& A6 G7 V2 ~9 C0 o- ^9 Y
Florida State University
" o% o; [; [/ @1 Y( K+ Y5 \* SLawrence Technological University, W+ t1 F0 F5 B, N
Pratt Institute
/ T5 R, v! R$ L3 Q$ l: cUniversity of Oregon
' _5 D2 O7 X, A# D; O/ K& j3 A. K" K! o4 C5 S" z8 C: \
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007$ M/ {! R6 G5 I8 u, g; s: o
$ x& a& t0 ]8 A4 F$ C6 i0 ]
UNDERGRADUATE
. X! H V5 a, T- u( p) c- l1 Cornell University3 r1 ~1 X& [: q+ @- s* ?3 t0 D
2 Rice University
* w* R( L: D+ T. R- s. W3 Syracuse University6 e4 x3 E, c `' d
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
6 [1 }0 I6 O$ {9 j. F& j5 Rhode Island School of Design# X q% c% I, P* x m. F: n8 |
6 Auburn University
- R, H* P; g% T+ |- K! u6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
8 B3 U, f+ i' h& {6 University of Kansas*" I8 [, {: A' t) C7 [& t
9 University of Texas at Austin
0 ?- ]* m/ o9 D( ^2 z' L: d10 Carnegie Mellon University
0 l* c0 |# [6 O5 K- Z11 University of Notre Dame, y4 r" i) W& G$ {
12 Kansas State University1 T; D7 i+ o# v; l& L4 p% V) {
13 Illinois Institute of Technology7 i( @4 ^" L, N( z9 Y
14 Iowa State University
. j A# t0 r) F/ X M& A14 Pratt Institute
- e0 \6 T3 ^, W14 University of Oregon1 F. N' n. V7 k' O+ I8 {! Z8 v! k1 k
14 University of Southern California
# ^" d" [, V; A3 U; F, S" k$ [% K% K" W; v! ~: ]- _; r
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
, c+ f a; `3 d/ x) Z2 j2 H L( W: y1 b2 M
GRADUATE
- @& @% S L0 |4 B8 i4 C1 Harvard University1 g" S) ?& _! q9 P4 k0 M
2 University of Cincinnati m! P( ]1 g" ]! v" v
3 Yale University0 s+ r, l+ I9 z! x1 O% L$ I6 _& V5 o1 L
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
( W) O1 H. ^, Y( U7 d: H5 University of Virginia' \+ b* ~# ~% Q8 K8 j
6 Cornell University# C5 v: H4 ]& h! U" v& o6 {+ b
6 Rice University& m4 `' L8 o6 ^0 d, \3 ~
6 Washington University in St. Louis
" ^1 d4 A4 F0 _9 Columbia University; N U, ^/ x0 D, a
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
3 }8 }" n; T# X' J; }6 u) K( I11 Princeton University# G, [- f1 J4 l. F9 i" q8 {
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign& p5 ~6 v# y3 N4 Z
11 University of Texas at Austin
$ U9 N" _6 |1 Z3 G6 S14 Rhode Island School of Design4 J) y2 v; T; U7 e
15 University of Michigan; t- R6 z" o7 m: B8 I
/ q! w$ [ L6 k0 \5 a% C. B- @* RDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
- A) t) E4 i( U6 H# W* r$ y1 Q6 Y) H5 j2 Y3 U- {; I
UNDERGRADUATE
) p$ K0 g) ^. N: x: M1 qSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 , d$ ]# A5 L- [8 _& U
Cornell University 1 1 1 2 4
8 q1 Z6 T& o$ E% f- `0 kRice University 2 3 3 4 10 : W5 z; g8 ^3 [+ _
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
' {1 ^+ M7 c( w# TVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
8 O) c5 @! k Z) _# jRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 - ' g3 g! B! J5 ]4 b
Auburn University 6 15 - - 10
+ ?. |/ V/ c$ k3 h9 {# X3 nCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 20 a1 C1 j8 ]+ u) l& f' ]
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
( _/ h% C' F8 D- p: y2 e% NUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
. ^0 l O8 @7 E0 LCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
( O) o3 y1 v9 QUniversity of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
4 C: f, {9 Q# r( ?: FKansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
$ g* L5 Z' m L5 M" dIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -
+ \% c- J& Z' s& HIowa State University 14 13 12 11 -
$ i9 U+ Q- W# e4 z& q% p! Z6 c/ ]6 BPratt Institute 14 10 - - -, x' K7 D, M( a. X
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -
3 x# x$ s5 Y {/ DUniversity of Southern California 14 - - - -' a! X4 T# W! j! _( i9 E1 _
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
4 q( u0 |; t5 s+ _2 c3 ^Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
4 p3 o W0 b# J3 X& C
; K" `+ H& L: [
0 F& b% W7 d3 |2 X# X* Y8 ]Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20076 c' q0 E& W" C$ A# K
' c& h* A" m W/ V3 i, jUNDERGRADUATE
, T8 I4 T6 v* i) E1 Louisiana State University5 P! i$ W8 z! _4 p/ D0 K
1 Pennsylvania State University
1 _) r, T1 ^7 G& \: p1 @0 `4 d3 Kansas State University9 w2 q- O) W2 |: z* f }
4 University of Georgia, f, F9 @7 _( ]7 C
5 Ball State University
/ Q# E" W' r; |, O1 J' @7 g! W5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
* D! \; h6 X0 Q6 E) \' ^5 Cornell University, ]/ X- h1 [$ U
5 Purdue University: }* x5 {( j0 C! V
9 Ohio State University
$ z8 e" |' `+ X10 Texas A&M University
5 h$ K8 y8 Q" c0 ]; K' b11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona6 I1 a) u% {8 w! z1 S, t
12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
- a& U$ u* `+ i* V4 @13 Michigan State University
' f2 _& X) O2 P0 q13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign5 O& j% P0 R6 j& W2 r% F5 H
15 Iowa State University
& S z$ r& Y+ x! t' T15 University of Oregon
7 J2 }" s6 a; ~7 I0 {15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
4 R4 G+ I: ~5 n# u Y1 Z7 y5 M" Z! \/ C; d
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007 S7 Q3 T3 q) o! R* T# O; w
# \! _$ i* P8 k1 M2 a' j; s! rGRADUATE
8 z& {3 ?1 b1 J( A6 t! q* E: T4 j1 Harvard University1 g4 a7 k, S, q7 r- ]
2 Kansas State University
, B! T9 R7 D8 _7 U z3 University of Georgia! L! b) E" h! m: Q% m, ]* x0 m# l
4 University of Pennsylvania
* m) D8 l8 c: J% l8 z4 I5 Louisiana State University
/ s9 M1 M- R' h4 ~6 Rhode Island School of Design! L* o1 E6 x- C# O3 @* P
6 University of Michigan3 E' \& T) @# d5 A5 H
6 University of Virginia
% k6 n8 S+ p5 W. ]; r7 ?( D2 p9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY4 z: o: m$ M! {" ]' `/ e! G0 O5 z
9 Ohio State University
1 y- _2 U) `- J11 Cornell University1 ~3 ^: w. g- p1 I5 ^' a1 E0 ~: x
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1 S7 T9 o9 u# w1 k% \ {0 P
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
4 a! V; V, b& H0 h13 Texas A&M University+ q8 l1 y4 x3 U5 h0 U' S8 V
13 University of California, Berkeley% V) n2 N" V: i. N
13 University of Oregon! N8 E+ t5 _- P
8 s- l+ q, R" p! J5 o& c
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
! S+ G5 R* n. n; f5 NThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms./ z, l8 F. t/ `5 x$ x8 ?
+ y5 V( E% C0 B; a4 MDesign:. U0 r2 {5 K1 u! Q6 G4 g6 }
1. Harvard University
9 G2 _4 y/ W, A( {2. Kansas State University, P% W6 T8 \9 S, r! m
3. Louisiana State University: C% L3 {' Q7 e; c8 ?
4. Pennsylvania State University! f' l. h! ?, E, I7 O+ A- K* _ J' P( I
5. Ball State University
5 s0 @6 h9 t! R% i5 Q, N$ E* b% X- a" ?/ p6 {. p( n" @3 ^. h
Analysis and planning:
$ P# n5 f0 m+ U+ N. X% g1. Kansas State University/ u$ e S. F* h
2. Pennsylvania State University
- j- ]$ L9 P/ |# q# L9 s8 u- ?$ x# [3. Louisiana State University
+ s3 Q9 c# k4 @) J- ^" EUniversity of Georgia
+ l* p4 N* ]/ @" C Q/ \) s5. Harvard University6 f; Q6 B) e3 F# x5 t
6 z. G, J$ Q* hConstruction methods and materials:
+ r' D" N8 w/ l7 v! t& ~1. Kansas State University: W/ ?1 p6 K% y
2. University of Georgia' [- \5 F! S, G8 x* p
3. Louisiana State University& I, ]: c* i- o0 v. k* M
Pennsylvania State University
+ w* A& o; O I& F0 ?% ]% SPurdue University
8 S) I: ?3 A" M4 ?
8 r& Y, _. ]- n% ?" ~' E7 z, B TComputer applications:) o- \6 P9 X0 }! ^1 w8 t4 D
1. Harvard University
1 z* r; m+ ?# r2 O3 v2. Pennsylvania State University1 d9 X8 U" [! a% e" n; P
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo2 Z, N7 R* q; z- E! N
Purdue University- \4 M3 I5 n( v" m7 p
University of Georgia
& b9 g8 K& Z0 C e; [/ t: p
3 T3 m4 {0 t2 V8 M6 dResearch and theory:
4 {4 u& y3 @0 v4 O/ F1. Harvard University7 @5 T. W8 `: t) A! m
2. Pennsylvania State University6 c4 Z9 u4 B' X7 C6 n9 q9 ~
3. Kansas State University9 s6 V3 d1 O* E5 l3 p) _) x
University of Georgia" N6 m8 R8 i t( _
5. University of Oregon
, I* s& }4 [! YUniversity of Virginia' O0 y$ e6 R |+ C4 U5 K
4 N* G1 [1 @" U" J3 C. N1 f3 BSecurity design principles:
) u: f+ o0 }5 `' {) j1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo% P$ I' g* A k1 _- N# F- H4 u
Kansas State University' R- \3 L2 O1 c- q
University of Georgia
% X; W, y, b7 t7 l- J4. Ball State University# |& |& ?, I0 E/ n4 K' R
5. Pennsylvania State University/ m; T6 Z8 j2 h. e$ g* I) R
3 F' _' |7 h3 J# o0 { ~5 Q- n- D P
Sustainable design practices and principles:
) c; S o6 Y6 K: u- ?+ J1. University of Georgia
8 G; ?: v; Z1 |& q1 c9 G0 c7 Z( e eUniversity of Oregon' a8 b! L# `: a; X5 a* B$ I# ~
3. Pennsylvania State University A3 I8 O+ c! S' M$ j/ t
4. Ball State University. [+ ^& F+ P9 X- `
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo: G! f9 Y. c9 P. J/ ~4 m6 ~( J7 O
Harvard University" G* v4 R, Y0 ?
Kansas State University
5 _ w1 A; Z- m" |, |# |4 wMichigan State University
" v3 E7 w2 `: u3 P* i7 _9 u. \; Q) q" }: \
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|