- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
   
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
|显示全部楼层
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044' j1 l# V7 J: C1 N$ s4 o
s) R9 B! A ]上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
& W- r) G4 m; y$ j$ b7 T+ L7 L- w5 k( p$ ^/ o
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
: l) j6 }: q6 H5 M0 N) \; T* T
7 R8 s7 k/ @. y |" ?7 Q2 FHarvard University – Architecture
' ~" i' j8 C: C• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
# X6 ?% ]3 d5 L2 L, n' ?and Urban Design, ~2 u4 W& m- \8 J4 W7 k
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline/ n: v- d8 `2 k0 l
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth. J; b" x, }) s2 z' P" _2 u% `5 @
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought c( {3 d. k7 T; d
• Breadth of world view
" D5 b, n6 B2 p8 H• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice# v% n& \5 V5 G- @5 k* `# T
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students, c/ x, \4 Q# @" _, H, v+ y
• Good balance of theory and practice, very international
1 d W1 ]7 I! i7 a2 ]
: X c0 M. P! X/ b/ r5 cUniversity of Cincinnati – Interior Design; [) ~1 P! r0 \( f* l0 ^3 T+ U R* ?
• Active connections to the profession
" ^$ A8 K8 f8 j! V# w" w• Strength of internship program5 C& m& V; {9 m! Y5 N G* c& j5 i
• CIDA similar program( G X3 M6 A: ], e' N4 Z
• Strong technology base
! _- w4 o1 _2 r, P( }• Strong overall undergraduate program
1 O9 n) S$ ?3 |' C- F& I• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior4 y( G4 S' Z, ^
Design and Architecture co-op% h1 @# W3 l; s
• Excellent co-programs4 G4 g/ D( W( J$ f
• Direct competition for internships and jobs
/ H" W( K* p9 A: \+ `* C) a- z• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students5 I l/ g5 y% b% I2 W2 R
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense$ c: E" Z( o& b }8 A5 W
1 @0 M/ x1 K" p8 H/ FUniversity of Virginia – Landscape Architecture3 s5 R `3 ]" K) r; T8 g4 {
• Attention to design and small town urbanism0 A( v# `0 O6 R$ ?" E3 W+ d" t
• Quality of faculty
, ]5 K: Z( {. d5 m7 r! L+ { P% [• Students can choose from three tracts of study6 Q( _% r; o# P. D, H3 m$ T: ]" ~$ I
• Good design research base in sustainable design
\2 Y/ F0 b) O' }' i' U• Consistent and value oriented educational mission' N6 y: R% t5 r: }( \3 T3 \
8 r6 c/ C% B' _$ j* [
* U+ r& Q& W. S7 a6 E! T5 [; PDesign Programs Most Admired
% b. i8 S S. Z% f+ }by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
: c1 c# c+ D! ?1 _- e4 T) |
7 ^9 v: G, _9 q4 S8 ^0 b. }Architecture
% a; L; l8 h% K1 Harvard University9 Q$ I: D5 ]" }; h3 B3 K+ z4 ~
2 Auburn University
. {, z9 m: p: {6 b9 s5 D- ^Massachusetts Institute of Technology0 d8 Y; e. p% W7 Y- B6 W
4 University of Michigan
+ U& @ M" K* j: G' O& i5 Columbia University& C+ V5 m' X3 a0 a3 _/ d
6 University of Pennsylvania
; r4 q6 q& J& ~- ?6 E% _University of Virginia$ n m4 F9 m( @/ @0 _( I/ r* i
7 Cornell University$ ?- X; `6 J: S4 q7 a: w4 w
Georgia Institute of Technology g0 P9 O, U' t& ?' ~( [
University of California, Berkeley
# I' |: z4 i% [+ D& XUniversity of Minnesota. L/ K$ T/ w z. j( c6 S
Yale University& N+ c. C7 E z3 j5 l% E
/ l, p: C- u! ]/ x! S4 X9 y1 c
Landscape Architecture
7 U% V; K/ \6 I8 M7 G1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada( Z% D( {3 S \# ^# P* u
Harvard University& K* }9 w) c7 G$ b4 |6 s2 m/ c1 v
University of Virginia
: f8 M5 l1 T, O% w4 K& S4 Pennsylvania State University
6 v( d. B K' A. J% {2 T; LUniversity of Georgia1 d. E! `" ]4 }
University of Pennsylvania
3 Y# [& g% V0 c7 California Polytechnic State University,
3 w( y6 Z4 d! y' U3 _San Luis Obispo: P% N, b3 E" Y7 `" G) h3 Z
Kansas State University
5 ]7 S6 t9 P4 @Michigan State University
4 I( k+ ~3 ?4 t* I5 I% R4 r) j$ }University of California, Davis* f! k7 z1 h8 j0 b$ ^; r3 y7 q
- U9 ?6 ?9 q9 x4 t
Interior Design& ]# `9 s; x8 B9 _) ~6 Z, W: s
1 University of Cincinnati' ]! F) d% q2 D% E7 k( e/ D e; \% c, B
2 Rhode Island School of Design
! S. ^/ G6 n. Z. g. b3 Arizona State University( L5 q" F* u/ @! ^, e2 Y4 x
Cornell University
- e6 k) c9 ?, H* z1 ?' O! UKansas State University
0 t+ t q( e$ j- \4 O! D1 A6 Art Center College of Design) l% [( F( N& }1 q
Art Institute of Chicago
. L& Z" R4 r) PFlorida State University
. a5 W3 k W0 L1 Q r5 D0 u/ ^Lawrence Technological University" R- N1 a* P: p9 o
Pratt Institute# h- T# p- s* k0 i( E/ \: H
University of Oregon
3 T2 d& n7 }; k! |8 b7 ^/ [9 G! g# x9 P$ \
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
3 x- F$ e5 U! Z7 R4 c5 E1 g0 L/ b8 o8 u( [6 f
UNDERGRADUATE) ~5 P2 C3 ^) D: ^
1 Cornell University% }* E& u9 v0 ?( l i
2 Rice University L( ^/ b2 {9 S% |! b
3 Syracuse University V5 c. X& f- S& S/ q) k' D
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University% {* {3 V8 [- F9 p: t
5 Rhode Island School of Design
( i% k0 ]* S# W: p4 b& y% ?6 Auburn University
5 B7 t1 X- X/ J7 u! H6 K6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo$ u# W& |9 ?' {8 o$ R L- [
6 University of Kansas*+ b7 N7 u" d6 @3 h* H2 n
9 University of Texas at Austin( U# s6 a3 V, c# ~& l9 G4 Z
10 Carnegie Mellon University
0 C5 @# M. i! P _% P6 V; ? W11 University of Notre Dame- q7 v. J6 i4 S; {. Z; f
12 Kansas State University
/ b- L( V0 }0 H13 Illinois Institute of Technology
5 j h" J# Y0 k* ]14 Iowa State University
7 `. M, T1 @' A% n14 Pratt Institute8 z v3 h, h) [0 o/ P- Z+ Q, p
14 University of Oregon
! b7 K3 }8 ~( L4 F2 U1 p14 University of Southern California
4 k0 r7 h# |8 f6 T. g/ C) x5 l) y
8 M. |$ r! I! D7 U( ?DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
& n3 A. D7 u" P6 q* f# I2 P0 Q
8 O' B, c* _+ R7 NGRADUATE
" B( Y, \1 I9 Q3 Y2 I( f1 Harvard University
) O0 W: t o6 e: W6 z) G, {/ K/ w% j2 University of Cincinnati+ b8 A; V( b# n$ T$ S
3 Yale University/ c& h5 D1 o K, z% P# A
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
* G9 @* s. }% I0 h5 V1 ~ l2 v5 University of Virginia
4 G8 ]% `+ ]# l9 W7 g6 Cornell University# p5 Q7 x q8 T% a# P2 W8 Z
6 Rice University8 r: K( l1 G6 i$ f( K& i# x
6 Washington University in St. Louis5 v( _) L4 T* J; X) u0 S# }- ~" Y9 [
9 Columbia University
- e0 I0 l- _2 {7 V+ s10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University" L9 p, H3 `7 O9 j3 u$ d7 }$ q
11 Princeton University3 @$ k+ C- ~( o. A
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) g+ N- G; D3 M& U9 u
11 University of Texas at Austin* M2 ~3 P% B& a- }% C3 X3 }2 q
14 Rhode Island School of Design
|. x' ?4 }6 g15 University of Michigan
; l3 y) @' r" R, Z( K6 R
c5 Q* E" Q, ]DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
2 x& t0 V6 t+ ?, p# H2 J" W# B1 _; w! f- V& B% J
UNDERGRADUATE / A! P% U' F% n8 o8 m! K
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
) Z6 {9 B5 f3 R8 a* |" WCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 & h6 l3 W& k0 y
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10
$ P7 s3 i8 K% v! ^$ w1 ?3 lSyracuse University 3 7 5 4 - l# {3 g# H0 d
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
- a# u" I$ K1 c0 ^3 uRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
3 B h& @& f4 U% P$ D& A1 IAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 ( \( {( }" D p. K3 G( N
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
+ |, A9 Q7 V0 g! IUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
2 Y+ g& }" ?: g% z1 s( Z E* u! uUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 68 z' Q6 Z! J/ ^6 k( c7 J
Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -" Y; }+ ?& J6 H8 l; n$ M L3 S& V" [
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
5 f$ a0 n4 M6 l6 t1 N; cKansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
! q" |+ L& z% C# B4 m7 [" K+ XIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -' j6 d/ i* y/ y
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -
% T* U. @" G# z. T: VPratt Institute 14 10 - - -% M3 b* H3 S% K
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -$ S6 e8 [5 N5 G7 ?/ |' X( k
University of Southern California 14 - - - - T; \1 X" R/ P, D2 B# Y9 t
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
: J) B* M/ f2 h- E$ Q3 y7 ~" ]Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
# n# l' O) R% A3 V1 t/ c7 s6 _, r
5 h& ? z* O, z: m! T! v9 R0 E2 C6 S4 a: n
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
" G! V5 R7 ~' R1 k7 n5 I5 D- p$ p9 k
UNDERGRADUATE- q, K2 D5 M( ?( v+ m
1 Louisiana State University! o" H; c2 ]% Y1 `, @+ Q
1 Pennsylvania State University
; }4 Z5 v# d8 y; y3 Kansas State University. R7 ]- p' C% ]( e( r' Z
4 University of Georgia. }* b. ~5 Y- r0 F4 ` u5 m
5 Ball State University
7 g( ?5 Q# D5 M" N5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo2 Q {. b+ Q' M9 K/ }9 l
5 Cornell University% y* u$ P& X: J V
5 Purdue University9 t9 P1 Q! _0 o0 |
9 Ohio State University
) v; v4 n# E& i4 _$ H10 Texas A&M University
* \, Q2 q$ @4 N11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
6 g# [& g3 @5 ]12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
+ e/ X( X' ^9 L/ @13 Michigan State University
/ s) E; X+ k3 W" i13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
: u8 m# K3 D/ P0 ^9 w6 G! q! M15 Iowa State University9 P, Y% U$ Z1 ?0 M7 a2 r
15 University of Oregon5 C" Q# L @ |
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
6 P/ m0 P4 [/ X/ r) C5 y- h7 X% b! C
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007# K( x- A" G1 P+ @
% W+ c8 i2 ~" i0 U" [GRADUATE
9 j# C( {/ E7 E! i) f1 Harvard University; ?+ X6 z* X+ L- G3 l7 u
2 Kansas State University
7 x3 A# [" T( R7 j- B: b3 University of Georgia$ r3 ]" n( y/ g( f1 @6 c. {' o
4 University of Pennsylvania
5 C1 v. F, B$ B2 Y, k, }5 Louisiana State University* o* H7 U# v0 z( k3 Z A* G
6 Rhode Island School of Design" A6 X2 B" e. y7 L. e
6 University of Michigan5 L4 t' c' Y, q9 D I8 M
6 University of Virginia
( G3 x+ E2 T- k* h+ {9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY7 E% c8 Y$ L$ D( h5 x V' l7 {
9 Ohio State University
$ X3 J7 z, h9 Y5 S$ ~11 Cornell University1 w+ [. y* P6 _, M' n/ z; l4 ~
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
+ {7 Y" `2 S5 v* B+ q% h" J: Y! l13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
6 ^6 P1 _0 D; N& o9 T$ `3 Y13 Texas A&M University3 |6 K" e6 o S! ~: @7 {
13 University of California, Berkeley; K) N7 w3 ~9 U0 E
13 University of Oregon: }/ U( ^7 @: x) _9 N+ p
5 e6 e4 y8 U3 Y
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
, p9 f2 G" d# Z6 w! i, Z7 L5 AThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.2 G) X+ r0 ?2 }: G+ M1 T8 q
' W( L- x: S1 @! ~0 | H
Design:
8 l: F Z$ F3 e; k! I1. Harvard University5 R! f5 V7 U! Y2 `3 U5 H
2. Kansas State University
9 Y/ H- \' N9 i. t$ q- |' n3. Louisiana State University
: T( L' c) f* u: E4. Pennsylvania State University
$ Y: |0 V. d# g6 z/ t p5. Ball State University9 V& Y! }- o* Z+ O4 O2 ^0 J# t; ^
7 M3 j- _' ?- s+ b+ L# D: M# NAnalysis and planning:
. f2 s' j7 W* F& q8 T$ D- {0 s. x1. Kansas State University
" ? y% t- N/ R3 w2. Pennsylvania State University
1 q) \9 W a4 Y# k* v3. Louisiana State University
3 Z. k# X3 q$ F" {) M, QUniversity of Georgia" n) h6 @4 n2 r5 f( ?% I1 t9 @
5. Harvard University5 h. r7 R/ r4 e" {
2 ~/ r) Y& q; K) i; g# D7 ]
Construction methods and materials:: r j( H: ?+ G2 C# p. K
1. Kansas State University
7 t) h0 ^9 E6 T* {2. University of Georgia- F! p% Q* f5 R
3. Louisiana State University
4 s. }7 Q/ G+ N* ^% OPennsylvania State University: q( q% o0 u( g9 r* H* P- u
Purdue University$ F1 L/ {2 Q- d
4 H" i1 R3 s6 G+ GComputer applications:
$ i/ c8 R& Z# n Y/ d1. Harvard University0 C- t( _& i" v3 T6 o4 m S
2. Pennsylvania State University9 J8 W; x, l7 H+ f- D: I
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo% ]* X- T# m9 I( ~ _
Purdue University
' l$ u i! o" p( PUniversity of Georgia: I ^+ _2 s" S: u
+ b w3 H5 c3 X: L9 x4 C+ {0 V
Research and theory:
( r+ B }, k2 J6 {9 s1. Harvard University
# i* B2 J% Q6 t" n1 e. F2. Pennsylvania State University+ h/ {7 P x8 x# X0 Y
3. Kansas State University- ^# F' s- R. \
University of Georgia
4 U' h& J5 W) `1 U0 G5. University of Oregon. [- S( G" q; E
University of Virginia# F# X/ U D9 }( r l
. M0 F9 O# i' v* k# [( w# ]& O: F
Security design principles:7 }' s4 d0 S4 ^* Y' f
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
0 @( j: V8 c, A6 LKansas State University
. c; u0 `$ C2 b# L- ?2 IUniversity of Georgia
. ~* Y+ m% f1 S+ c" X K4. Ball State University
- ], ~4 T- d" \2 O4 ^5. Pennsylvania State University
# U+ V' [: p/ \; h8 \. s+ |! l( [' A0 Y) r% L) s
Sustainable design practices and principles:, L+ C! a# Z' t6 A: ?% ~1 ]
1. University of Georgia( w `7 i7 h. t) ^1 M& y
University of Oregon
5 Z& ^: P& X9 E; a3. Pennsylvania State University. a4 o4 u* }* \5 `* i7 \
4. Ball State University
/ d3 I$ m% I2 T( x1 ~! CCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
" @: ~3 u5 ^8 v1 _1 mHarvard University
9 a1 S# v$ h0 pKansas State University9 q$ {: |4 Z, h R% ~! C/ U" H
Michigan State University+ _9 w& _; ^2 Z8 V
; {. x1 d7 P# `) r0 h2 ]
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
architecture rank graduate
-
architecture-programs-with-the-most-AIA-ACSA
-
archtecture-skill-assess
-
landscape-architecture-historical-survey.
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|