- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
  
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044: b8 [" i: @4 d* f' _! K# y
# Q; m0 S" F. |4 t, C8 N
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。( D+ d( M' Q5 J% H- G
: M( O" u) N \: F/ @9 ^Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
+ O. C, d" ^' V: s
2 {& @& ]9 I* l' i6 b3 UHarvard University – Architecture
& C( `' j6 G1 t3 Q5 H- C• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture) b' U- p* T# \8 T2 h8 b% U
and Urban Design
* W8 L+ U2 I7 ^• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline/ k- P. b3 ?# _6 [2 j/ _9 E
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth
+ Q+ w$ {7 C2 @1 n8 p# S• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought
1 i- i- T: }- ~• Breadth of world view I1 Y% }3 N3 f! z. e. i
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice: P \8 d2 o7 |8 Y* Z+ J
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
+ f3 d' `: K9 Y# N4 G% l• Good balance of theory and practice, very international
; M' n6 W2 x. q( {% p0 r7 A/ E3 T# x7 C2 g' i C" H5 O
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design/ X o$ Q; k+ N) v- M3 N
• Active connections to the profession
7 e) ^3 @/ ~+ A+ a• Strength of internship program
; p1 G. u8 o" W, o0 z0 A• CIDA similar program4 }9 G8 f' K: A& l2 Q2 j/ }
• Strong technology base
0 n0 a8 r& E) w* I4 G$ o; B• Strong overall undergraduate program% f1 f5 q' ~; r- ]4 U" f
• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior
6 C7 ~& C, ?3 f/ w/ VDesign and Architecture co-op
6 w( [3 r% N: B2 c• Excellent co-programs
/ q0 m& ]$ U. A! ^6 H5 ~• Direct competition for internships and jobs, k1 U# r$ e' z5 s& l
• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students
2 y- G7 I g8 |1 U" y& [• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
9 `' f/ K* c5 N3 ~! z: e' J- p7 A1 S/ U* t" m
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
& W: O7 Z2 i" P$ G" u; H& T! u2 X1 `• Attention to design and small town urbanism
; |' O6 u" b- o" [ B: _/ v• Quality of faculty
4 c2 H Q3 F5 v( ]• Students can choose from three tracts of study2 z" F5 X3 f9 Y# |3 E
• Good design research base in sustainable design
& ?# O+ H, T4 U4 d9 e• Consistent and value oriented educational mission' F1 V! J/ j' W, M6 X g- s
" D |* K! B) s% k7 j8 {
1 O' t% m5 S, m) Q ]0 s( k- F# H
Design Programs Most Admired- Z3 s9 G. T7 w4 l* ]
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007 - o% c0 K. f& C$ K. L% [/ I
6 q/ Q9 R; F! LArchitecture
9 F: F7 k+ X. {, |4 d, \1 Harvard University9 |. ~& A% `0 B" z; c) T/ [! F0 X
2 Auburn University% N1 u* e% O w( i* n
Massachusetts Institute of Technology' s+ m6 E; ?4 V9 w! v
4 University of Michigan1 `9 {9 e$ q+ S. s. h
5 Columbia University
2 ]3 G( K4 a; e; Z+ {2 L6 University of Pennsylvania
0 V G' V6 d! q l0 |8 h' ? ^University of Virginia& i( H7 N' {. B: u/ V+ u1 X+ X7 F7 z
7 Cornell University' F Z: n- o# o: t1 c' A2 G
Georgia Institute of Technology
; F2 H, ^% F; S; d0 Z& Q# ^University of California, Berkeley5 j" p+ Z9 ?, e% Y! z6 h$ K: @
University of Minnesota
2 b6 ?1 Y! E: ~1 g; y$ sYale University
, r- t( o: s1 B8 c
0 j2 u7 {( q0 B# ]2 _ fLandscape Architecture1 |9 a9 u+ u6 {( ~$ _/ K* q
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
* v" Z* `1 S! R) P/ g9 B# AHarvard University
) |. V/ N( v3 m+ C$ R7 J, @8 U0 fUniversity of Virginia; @ W0 ~$ T: X) L! v! U
4 Pennsylvania State University; O C3 y1 @/ r0 V/ m
University of Georgia6 G+ ]9 a; a) v7 X, F1 g* a
University of Pennsylvania8 H% O1 I* O7 g3 Y8 O
7 California Polytechnic State University,
' j5 r. K$ j* L. G3 l; w }( q2 j( ISan Luis Obispo
6 D; [, a, j7 U+ I2 J0 ~7 S7 W$ RKansas State University6 O4 ]7 ?" w6 k. Z: d
Michigan State University
( `) J% e& |7 o* J: @9 ~5 |% @6 VUniversity of California, Davis
+ E* M; @0 E) B' h9 k9 g7 |, r" h x4 x0 [7 ^
Interior Design
, _: l: h- U3 G5 }: H1 University of Cincinnati
& X% ^: T: H, a8 S6 B; C4 `. q2 Rhode Island School of Design
0 Z8 _8 ^6 J1 R5 [3 O8 Q; Q3 Arizona State University
/ T7 N; Z3 G9 K( w1 q4 E; BCornell University
# q7 ?. L) N- I1 U* K/ Z1 SKansas State University6 _: J: E& W* D' q+ F
6 Art Center College of Design1 V7 [3 e6 n2 y/ q* N5 K
Art Institute of Chicago
% ^8 x4 [( \ o' T: L7 T3 m8 V3 JFlorida State University# f+ p$ p& Q# [5 o% G) t
Lawrence Technological University* ?& g" e) ?9 C5 e# _& i3 }" t
Pratt Institute' c) x% ~+ H$ E& Y$ M& e' ]
University of Oregon! u% o+ k0 Y' L' ?* {- e
4 V; v* g8 ]& f j' ~DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
3 ~+ ~' |2 U* a2 V g$ t
8 d: a) P6 p6 W) SUNDERGRADUATE
4 s! B, I2 S. p5 L1 Cornell University
) h. q8 _) N8 w/ a/ G! c2 Rice University
" `% L; t1 A% S3 Syracuse University
* o, V" K# w# p/ S' s4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
6 \: o: G3 Y1 L' L$ Q5 Rhode Island School of Design7 z- m# N' K0 O" y$ g+ A; Z6 F8 |3 R* l
6 Auburn University
3 l8 W$ ^- H3 n' Y' \) G+ Z6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
8 j. p! H; t3 G4 e& {- m6 University of Kansas*# A3 |9 L. S# H6 X5 C( ]
9 University of Texas at Austin
J5 H! b$ r9 ~% {10 Carnegie Mellon University& h, m% M. ]- I0 Z9 w. e/ U9 O4 K6 U
11 University of Notre Dame4 Y/ X7 K; _+ o* Y# z' r
12 Kansas State University
0 U+ h2 o) @1 b5 P8 ~13 Illinois Institute of Technology1 e2 E" q3 q6 G i- ^" w. J
14 Iowa State University
+ X2 U5 g+ a0 S4 k' @$ v: G14 Pratt Institute
8 [& V9 ?" n1 l+ `* U0 `: t14 University of Oregon
1 ~5 G7 _8 B7 [4 g2 |14 University of Southern California; A( H$ u5 L* y9 z, X5 h
( m! S/ Y6 h, EDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
8 l; N2 w, I$ d j3 p& L& Z* r0 ]' J$ q* Y
GRADUATE
2 e2 y& s+ R% {1 c1 Harvard University
% U, O+ G* L3 M0 C# w+ n) Y2 University of Cincinnati
. g- z, k, n+ i: a; X4 F3 Yale University& u2 G! L ?0 ^' O; y4 f
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
' }6 f2 B7 @& u5 University of Virginia3 _+ T" ~' @$ f8 w. }
6 Cornell University
A# g7 Y/ C# ^- e6 Rice University
6 L7 S7 z- @1 E0 }6 Washington University in St. Louis
3 U8 M0 ]9 `" n$ {7 {& @9 Columbia University- E8 g" {* U* Y" J7 m# p. X
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
1 w! b5 w+ y4 m X& g0 x/ G0 ~11 Princeton University8 D5 }( d/ w3 b: ^( g
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
! m: v4 O2 Q# f11 University of Texas at Austin
p7 z# R; Y$ T2 v+ B p. c; f- q14 Rhode Island School of Design
* L& R1 T* Q$ C1 g1 [15 University of Michigan
5 P7 G- u7 }4 n" p! J& A2 a0 c H5 B. l' d/ A9 w
DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs( `6 \# l6 i8 O5 ^" |# T+ X9 U
) N- b0 W: B: c# f
UNDERGRADUATE
# A. L& O+ F4 r8 CSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 $ H+ k$ v$ T+ r! |; z# W
Cornell University 1 1 1 2 4
1 y; x1 l% _; ~) F$ w. l* TRice University 2 3 3 4 10 * i* o/ o% v+ ?! m- h! |
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 - + s' h# f7 {! F
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14 * M& Z/ g$ H; R4 N# l
Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 - 8 j' r& W1 H& Y) v6 J; x
Auburn University 6 15 - - 10 6 o) Y5 }& R$ }/ ?+ M# f
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 29 k- ]/ W. g7 | i) ~: j' }8 c
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
/ [/ [6 B# T8 F* K- dUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
4 T! b. t" H2 v& k( @* MCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -* j: d& [% z: d; g5 e1 Y
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
0 L- X+ N! L$ ]* b- @! j2 i5 QKansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
7 N& Y) C' G3 g# ?5 j+ rIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -1 x" v0 N9 c3 v' I, B
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -( g" {' L8 r2 b/ m1 C& ^
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -3 U, t3 u4 x# M# r% j
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -6 D" G( o' H* {2 r
University of Southern California 14 - - - -
! ]. s+ ]0 s& ?' cBall State University‡ - - - - 142 b. L0 |4 b! d* [: f/ X; X2 q
Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
$ e' D" ~9 v3 i
0 W4 k8 z# y% F: i O8 m/ _" H3 G, M" l' c4 A4 o1 Z5 I! `/ F
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007* g- G2 `$ _+ [0 ?( C- L0 x
# i2 R+ f4 c1 dUNDERGRADUATE
: n" q3 Z/ w. ]! T9 }1 Louisiana State University9 W' Y! U; @- P! w q1 ^
1 Pennsylvania State University4 c6 |% j+ ^. V' w, \
3 Kansas State University& h4 v# @! m# B3 R7 ?
4 University of Georgia" B/ I5 t4 u8 I
5 Ball State University
T* L( Q% P/ [2 Q) h4 H5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
( o( O" \+ q M& k5 S& a5 Cornell University
4 R# C9 i2 {' j$ m* H6 ^5 Purdue University- V6 C+ j+ M# k7 j% I
9 Ohio State University
# Z' q% Z/ f8 R10 Texas A&M University5 s; q; N8 d- A+ ?
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
, x! j- H) d' i; }6 z' ]12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
; r6 D- r5 ^- m0 R+ u13 Michigan State University' ]" V! b( o" a! x8 S9 J2 N
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
# O, _6 y% J' P5 Q" w15 Iowa State University
6 E0 w c& j2 k7 f* b5 F15 University of Oregon
6 C& O* B2 x; g) a- s. T% q15 University of Wisconsin-Madison7 d: V$ l j+ x+ c" I I J
: R6 A, a& H' p& b
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007# @" d- |, h3 v/ m$ I% P
N. @( Z% h+ V, k7 R
GRADUATE1 e- k( B/ _3 `8 N0 I# i7 i; N$ p
1 Harvard University
3 C3 \2 g. U9 b4 H V& p2 Kansas State University
/ ^4 W H: T$ j' r+ p# H3 University of Georgia! G' e5 [- k: `: J9 ~
4 University of Pennsylvania, ~4 s! O! w3 Q9 }3 {
5 Louisiana State University) V" i6 E- P |' p' e; W F6 X
6 Rhode Island School of Design
' {" b: y4 S& r2 P& ]* D6 University of Michigan" |% ^5 C" F1 {5 u- P0 }" e E
6 University of Virginia/ M. x2 o0 ~( c4 w7 F3 @" \
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
9 t" ^* l; J2 z' q! V) H: H9 Ohio State University
9 B, f# f) I0 P7 e* M11 Cornell University) E! T$ H/ s+ M' R9 ?/ c
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign! a2 `* a, r8 x( @/ g. G
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona% L) V: C( Y: l2 w1 ~7 Q
13 Texas A&M University8 l2 G# @" L5 W! w* w0 h ?
13 University of California, Berkeley
* {$ F, B3 {3 F9 L" W/ Z C13 University of Oregon) E& P$ _0 ]: E6 N; q/ n# [
% D. W* |/ Q; zSkills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture8 Z2 ?$ ^! n. P/ h6 K# M M
This ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
4 a; k1 J0 e# E3 g9 J# |( N. J( n8 h
Design:
Z: X' V) f& o+ L/ b# d- f1. Harvard University. p0 G7 j/ H* O% z
2. Kansas State University4 |4 F$ d- C, R# E7 {$ g" q0 W
3. Louisiana State University
1 B7 L6 i) F1 s0 @% @; O+ G5 I4. Pennsylvania State University9 P M s, a4 _! @0 A
5. Ball State University: ]' S, l, S" `# n# y( I9 c
0 U3 l0 h& w' N* C
Analysis and planning:# E8 v7 f0 t( T+ k) t" G' x; ?" V6 O
1. Kansas State University7 A$ R3 t* k" h) q+ q* k
2. Pennsylvania State University
+ G1 |) q3 o+ D( o6 i5 y9 c4 Q# A {3. Louisiana State University& @% a3 d. v0 h3 ^
University of Georgia, m3 Q1 b& A% l$ ]
5. Harvard University
; {1 H/ v) X! D7 I9 u$ o( z$ i; x& U. @" j' R1 Y
Construction methods and materials:/ |9 m# x+ K7 F6 p0 T" y, ^0 k2 Q; j6 q
1. Kansas State University& A- l0 X- c' v5 J7 F' u
2. University of Georgia
+ E, \. h/ }8 B& U% y3. Louisiana State University$ Q* E4 \6 m9 W( l
Pennsylvania State University$ d4 Q/ t, A; ?3 b& o9 B4 N
Purdue University
7 n, ~ W, k" z6 X! O) @# y, z5 M7 X+ E! x/ _8 f, ?) z6 y7 x
Computer applications:
+ L* m% m, {8 X2 s# J1. Harvard University, V% _0 G- w# E- t- V. p
2. Pennsylvania State University# b# B8 M- n- ^" j4 q" a
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
; b9 f" ]0 C" |) kPurdue University
; k- _# f1 Z! ^: Z( i5 E0 r! FUniversity of Georgia
* I4 l8 H$ |* t( R' {1 B1 s @: Y% e$ Q4 ?3 @
Research and theory:
$ v; u$ q( y8 A( b/ s. e1. Harvard University4 k* V4 ~' y) x
2. Pennsylvania State University
8 v, M' V9 D8 y; L" l3. Kansas State University
0 y6 q% ]" ?. Q1 I( G6 a& JUniversity of Georgia* x8 o7 u8 r. }) W8 L! g# L
5. University of Oregon
' {, C2 i! F) \+ ^+ @# _7 R" V5 RUniversity of Virginia
# L6 }, h' X8 r+ E6 A* h" b$ U7 T* I( P' w% Q& H6 x
Security design principles:8 ?+ \9 O, V/ P9 ]1 z
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, N9 j! Q& ]9 T# f4 _
Kansas State University
( n! h0 ]2 }4 m' `$ ^; Z' JUniversity of Georgia
: U1 z0 R3 _- V- Y4. Ball State University
1 r5 G2 U+ i/ ^0 L; p6 u/ I2 l5. Pennsylvania State University
# w% P& e( x4 a
0 c8 P- g" i& F' G v3 d: BSustainable design practices and principles:
1 |* h! D. Q0 r- V1. University of Georgia5 ^, ^$ D S' U1 ?8 b
University of Oregon
4 q2 q, _6 R1 T) T' n. u( W" X8 h3. Pennsylvania State University
: R2 C) }( C! B- [$ U4. Ball State University
$ t# n9 x) W, i+ G+ H! wCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
! B5 {) l1 h- P2 ~, j, J/ GHarvard University7 _) }: p, x; N% c" H
Kansas State University
/ r5 K- n/ L6 n" m! }$ ^Michigan State University& z& p+ n' X/ O8 Q
# c# N7 T& N, [1 k& O, O[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|
GO
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
发表于 2008-2-16 15:16:05
发表于 2008-2-16 16:58:50
发表于 2008-10-30 17:16:27
3
转发
