Argument51【0906G 文以载道三月四月作文小组】第二周第二作业 on 1shiaiwode

ph粉丝UID: 2340814

  The arguer thinks that antibiotics do well to patients who suffer from muscle strain. However, from the article, we can not come to the conclusion. There are several holes.
  First, the conclusion is based on the precondition that muscle-strain patients are easily to get secondary infected. In order to support his viewpoint, the arguer should offer more information about the probability that secondary infection happen to muscle-strain patients. None but the possibility is high enough to demonstrate the experiment is significant. Otherwise, it is nonsense. To our disappointment, we can not get essential information about secondary-infection probability from the arguer.
  
   Second, the experiment is lack of persuasion because there are too many differences between the two groups in experimental conditions. For example, first, the two doctors are so different. It is obvious that a doctor who specialized in sports medicine know more about muscle problems than a general physician. And, the arguer does not tell us exactly the condition of the two groups' members. An important aspect in this is that young people are more likely to recuperate faster than elders.

    Third, we are told that the second group took sugar pills instead of antibiotics. But there is no evidence for us to approve that the sugar pills do not influence the recuperation. Maybe sugar pills slow down the recuperation time. Besides, even though it is the antibiotics that quicken the recuperation time, we have to pay great attention to the fact that antibiotics are probable to have side effects. That is really a question.
   In a word, in purpose of convincing us that antibiotics should be taken as part of treatment to patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain, the arguer needs to offer more data and scientific facts which can answer all of our queries to the conclusion.


你能灵活运用词汇，用不同的词汇来表达相同的意思，思路清楚，一定要向你学习  HOHO.

[ 本帖最后由 ph粉丝 于 2009-1-19 09:48 编辑 ]