【09GRE作文冲刺组】yanxin19 2月19日作文issue

yanxin19UID: 2254573

补上昨天 迟来的ISSUE进度赶不上了
请 tanyujing2  d596086两位兄台或JJ好好修改 谢谢 写出了不容易，比上一篇好多了

不限时 字数564 ISSUE40

To begin with, the
criteria to differentiate the individual interests and contribution to the whole society is disputable in that it is a harsh conclusion that whatever individual interest of scholars and researchers could not be applied to the broader realm. A striking example involves Sigmund Freud's conscious and subconscious theory in which he revealed that it is the libido, a sexual power that excites most of our behaviors and development. Quirk and unbelievable enough even the theory is, yet, it makes one of the three most important fundament of 20th century psychology and current supported by neuroscience and brain imagine technique. On the contrary, if the individual interest is far more self-centered and not based on scientific proofs, it will not be successfully broaden.

Secondly, Admittedly, personal pursue of inspiration has two merits: one lie in that it is critial to be more specification in scientific research. the other is that the scholars and researchers enlighted by intrinsic will and intellect are always yield better specific and outstanding in the field the focused than those assigned specific subject area. It might be tempt to understand the case is identity in arts and humanities, most the excellent artist novelist, and poets are those
quest personal fantasies and not moved by their surroundings, the government and economic status, for instance. Picasso and Hemingway and Newton could justify this.

Even revealing the unknown field is our own humanity, there are a myriad flaws in merely pursuing unusual and idiosyncratic interests, which are advocated by the speaker. Firstly, the outcome of
researches, especially scientific research rest on restricted lab conditions, is always not easily applied in the out-lab, in other word, more larger society. Secondly, we could not advocate the research that not based on science, like strange religious and that not actually practical will not be put into use at least in the lifespan of the author of it, in humanity considering.

The researches should be linked to application to the broader researchers, and the larger society. We have to concede that this point is indispensable in
allocating research funding and
bring about more immediate social influence. Take the contemporary medicine for example, it is pressing to cure more patient, in turn, lab research in universities and research institutes is necessary to ensure the valid treatment. Yet, any
medicine quest should based on the clinical application, even those in the neuron, molecule,or genetic level will be linked to clinical practice in the future.

In conclusion, scholars and researchers could not avoid to
consider whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society, even they have right, even if responsibility to pursue their individual interests, some
too unusual or idiosyncratic pursuit and those pursuit not based on science should be check and approve carefully and ensure the practical use in the future.