issue144“永不言弃”互改小组第十九次作业 by9号

cameo0320UID: 2599448

144."It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.


1、艺术评论家具备专业的艺术素养，懂得艺术历史和审美理论，艺术评论的作用，可以帮助艺术家发现自己不足，找到方向。对于普通民众来说，艺术评论可以帮助他们更好的理解艺术作品，让我们知道该欣赏什么样的艺术，而不至于浪费时间和金钱

2、艺术的特点，创造性，主观性、独立性，个性，艺术创作需要自由， 不恰当的艺术评论会妨碍艺术的发展，限制艺术家的创造力
3、此外，有些艺术评论家水平和能力不够，他们根本不理解艺术品就对其妄加评论， 不够客观。(l例如，梵高等不被同时代的评论家认可，他们不理解梵高的作品)

甚至，不同的艺术评论家代表不同的利益，有些批评完全是出于个人目的，片面的评论。

4、艺术家应该分辨真正的能够给自己艺术创作带来启迪的评论，摒弃那些恶意的评论。



The speaker asserts that it is the artist gives society something of lasting value, not the critic. As far as I am concerned, there is no denying that the artist provides society with wonderful and beautiful works which have lasting merit, however, it is unjustified to overlook the importance of critic who also play a significant role in creating and passing lasting value of society.

First of all, there is no doubt that it is the creative minds and skillful works of artists that make our quotidian life colorful and give society something of lasting value. There are numerous examples to illustrate this opinion, almost everyone know the famous work "Mona Lisa" which not only be considered as the peak of painting skills but also bring people who appreciate it spiritual enjoyment and help our society understand "beauty" ,the forever topic of human beings, essentially
and deeply. And the novel "gone with the window", a book reflect the social circumstance of "the native war of America", help readers learn much about "love" and "patriotism" which also exist as long as our society. In short, the meaningful works of artist's play an crucial role in giving society lasting value.

However, throughout history, art critics have lasted as long as art itself. Art critics usually posses a great deal of theories of beauty and knowledge of art history and art forms, as a result, they not only
can help the public to appreciate artistic work but also can help artist promote their working level.

For one thing, a critic who is familiar with a particular artist's works might have certain insights about those works that the layperson would not. Therefore we can learn it from all of these critics, which can help us understand an artistic work better and also help us to be a good connoisseur. For instance, relying on the evaluation of critics public understand and interpret "the last dinner", the work of
Da Vinci which contain a lot of secret contents
without the critics, common person who have no knowledge about
art and history may can't realize the great of the works. Besides, since their comment and evaluation of an artwork severs as a filter, which helps us determine which art is worth our time and attention.

For another, they can provide feedback for artists and constructive criticism can result in better work. All of the greatest feats in history, which gave society something of lasting value, are those created by artists and evaluated by critics. Take “Wuthering Heights” as a example, when the novel being published, attracted many critics to evaluate it, and also arose public's attention, both the two factors made the book a great and interesting one. In a word, the more evaluation a works get from critics the more person will pay their attention on it, and the more valuable it will be.

But, it also should be emphasized
that sometimes the critic may can't understand the art correctly as the works are the reflection of artist's personal emotion and interest, thus, it is possible that some works which were denied and overlooked proved great and meaningful after many years.
For example, Van Gogh's paintings weren't appreciated until after his death. He was living a difficult and poor life, almost all critic in his period thought his works had no value. Yet, all the works become the priceless
art collecting by all world's
museum. Van Gogh's painting Sunflower was sold with the highest price in the auction. Critics just a interpreter of art, whether they can evaluate the art correctly not only base on his or her knowledge but also associate with their keen perception
about art tendency.

To sum up, artist and critics are supplement of each other. All of the greatest artistic works in history, which gave society something of lasting value, are those created by artists and evaluated by critics.

stgzhaoUID: 2583165

The speaker asserts that it is the artist gives society something of lasting value, not the critic. As far as I am concerned, there is no denying that the artist provides society with wonderful and beautiful works which have lasting merit, however, it is unjustified to overlook the importance of critic who also plays a significant role in creating and passing lasting value of society.
First of all, there is no doubt that it is the creative minds and skillful works of artists that make our quotidian life colorful and give society something of lasting value. There are numerous examples to illustrate this opinion, almost everyone know the famous work "Mona Lisa" which not only be considered as the peak of painting skills but also bring people who appreciate it spiritual enjoyment and help our society understand "beauty" ,the forever topic of human beings, essentially
and deeply. And the novel "gone with the window", a book reflect the social circumstance of "the native war of America", help readers learn much about "love" and "patriotism" which also exist as long as our society. In short, the meaningful works of artist's play an crucial role in giving society lasting value.
特别讲出人类用很的话题——美、爱情等等很不错。
However, throughout history, art critics have lasted as long as art itself. Art critics usually posses a great deal of theories of beauty and knowledge of art history and art forms, as a result, they not only
can help the public to appreciate artistic work but also can help artist promote their working level.
（can应该放在not only 前面吧。。。）
For one thing, a critic who is familiar with a particular artist's works might have certain insights about those works that the layperson would not. Therefore we can learn it from all of these critics, which can help us understand an artistic work better and also help us to be a good connoisseur. For instance, relying on the evaluation of critics public understand and interpret "the last dinner", the work of Da Vinci which contain a lot of secret contents without the critics, common person who have no knowledge about art and history may can't realize the great of the works. Besides, since their comment and evaluation of an artwork severs as a filter, which helps us determine which art is worth our time and attention.
For another, they（refer to what？） can provide feedback for artists and constructive criticism can result in better work. All of the greatest feats in history, which gave society something of lasting value, are those created by artists and evaluated by critics. Take “Wuthering Heights” as a example, when the novel being published, attracted many critics to evaluate it（这句似乎应该是when being published, the novel attracted many critics to evaluate it）, and also arose public's attention, both the two factors made the book a great and interesting one(a great one as well as an interesting one). In a word, the more evaluation a works get from critics the more person will pay their attention on it, and the more valuable it will be.
But, it also should be emphasized that sometimes the critic may can't understand the art correctly as the works are the reflection of artist's personal emotion and interest, thus, it is possible that some works which were denied and overlooked proved great and meaningful after many years.
For example, Van Gogh's paintings weren't appreciated until after(deleted!) his death. He was living a difficult and poor life; almost all critic in his period thought his works had no value(consider his works of little value). Yet, all the works become the priceless art collecting by(of?) all world's museum. Van Gogh's painting Sunflower was sold with the highest price in the auction. Critics just a interpreter of art, whether they can evaluate the art correctly not only base on his or her knowledge but also associate with their keen
perception about art tendency.

To sum up, artist and critics are supplement of each other. All of the greatest artistic works in history, which gave society something of lasting value, are those created by artists and evaluated by critics.
艺术家是评论人的补充？


我感觉我要是能有你这种思路我就发达了。。。所以只能改改句式上的问题了。。。