- 最后登录
- 2011-7-11
- 在线时间
- 282 小时
- 寄托币
- 428
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-2
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 364
- UID
- 2163892
 
- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 428
- 注册时间
- 2005-12-2
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
Accompanied by the ever increasing advance in science and technology, the demand on education rise(rises) quickly. But since most people have a preference on those careers, such as lawyers, managers and the like, the low level of teachers’ salary is(is been) ignored. Thus, the public claim that we should raise the payment of all teachers. However, after all aspects carefully considered(after considering all the aspects carefully...后面接的是I...所以应该把consider放前面吧...), I still believe that teachers should be paid in accordance with their students' performance.
To begin with, the more efforts teachers put in teaching, the more they earn. As the old saying goes, no pay no gain. Under this standard, teachers will try their best to improve the teaching skills and educate their students. This measure dramatically increases(总觉得用increase不太妥...有没有别的词替换...) teachers’ enthusiasm on education. Take the sports field for example. The wealth of the athletes depends upon their performance. Undoubtedly, the well-known basketball players in NBA, such as Kobe Bryant, receive a high salary. As a result, this rule stimulates other players to progress, which brings fame and profit to the team. If this rule cannot be executed in education, how can we hope that all teachers keep working well?
In addition, this method is not only beneficial for teachers, but also for students, who are eager for knowledge. As is known to all, an excellent teacher can influence a student's whole life. Since teachers keep improving themselves and devote themselves into teaching career, students can always receive wonderful class speeches(lectures会不会好点...), patient instruction and creative thought. For instance, when I was a high school student, our school paid our teachers relying on our grades. Benefiting from this policy, math was no longer my nightmare under Mr. Wang’s instruction.(这里结构有点问题...是math benefits me吗) So, it is through this measure that students acquire education of higher quality.
Admittedly, there are no gardens without weeds. What we cannot deny is the fact that teachers may focus on students' exam score and neglect the spiritual cultivation, since most students' performance are tested in paper exams.
To sum up, the idea that teacher(get) paid by students’ performance(这里有点问题...你的意思是students' performance pay teacher...还是用according to吧...) does good to both students and teachers. So why not put this policy into effect?
不错的文章...基本没什么大问题... |
|