求拍：Cam5-Test1-Task2

zscarlUID: 2539807

task 2: universities should accept equal unmbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In morden dsays, higher education is an important stepping stone for students to find their futures, but it is also an widespread arguement whether universities should take indentical numbers of male and female students in all subjects. To my personal view, i has very limited advantages to do so.
First of all, not every subjects is suitable for everyone, in another words, some subjects are better for boys, while others are better for girls. For instances, more male students will like to take physics than girls, even from the history, we can easily learn that there are more male physicians too, while for mursing subject, more girls will be interested, they are also more efficient to complete such subjects with good sresult, Research shows that only 1% of male student and pass nursing subject in Malaysia. Secondly, instad of fixing the propotion of male and female students in the class. To let students choose for their own interests will further improve their performance. Just imagine, if one was put into an course which he/she does not like at all, his/her result can not be oustanding without interest.
However, there my be some advantages for colleges to accept equal numbers of male and female students, one of which is to deliver equal graduates in all aspects. That may give female and male equal opportunities when choosing careers, but it is also doubtable whether every job fit either male or female equally. Arguement will raise when more females are reparing drainages or more males are doing preschool teaching.
In summary, itis obervious that there are more advantages to have more males in some subjects and more females in others, instead of fixing equal number of boys and girls in every subject in universities. (291 words)

欢迎猛拍， 留下您认为可能得到的分数。

bqianaUID: 193168

However,的这段扩展不够哈

TryFlyUID: 2600601

1# zscarl
In morden dsays, higher education is an important stepping stone for students to find their futures, but it is also an widespread arguement whether universities should take indentical numbers of male and female students in all subjects. To my personal view, i (I)has very limited advantages to do so.( 这句冒失有点问题)

First of all, not every subjects(subject) is suitable for everyone, in another words, some subjects are better for boys, while others are better for girls. For instances（instance）, more male students will like to take physics than girls, even from the history, we can easily learn that there are more male physicians too,(这句楼主再可以琢磨一下) while for mursing(nursing) subject, more girls will be interested, （被动语态？）they are also more efficient to complete such subjects with good sresult,(逗号太多了)Research shows that only 1% of male students and（have） pass nursing subject in Malaysia.

Secondly, instad of fixing the propotion of male and female students in the class.(,) To let students choose for their own interests will further improve their performance. Just imagine, if one was put into an course which he/she does not like at all,( 时态的问题) his/her result can not be oustanding without interest.

However, there my be some advantages for colleges to accept equal numbers of male and female students, one of which is to deliver equal graduates in all aspects. That may give female and male equal opportunities when choosing careers, but it is also doubtable whether every job fit either male or female equally. Arguement （argument）will raise when more females are reparing drainages or more males are doing preschool teaching.

In summary, it is obervious(obvious) that there are more advantages to have more males in some subjects and more females in others, instead of fixing equal number of boys and girls in every subject in universities. (291 words)

楼主注意单词的拼写啊...加油