- 最后登录
- 2009-10-16
- 在线时间
- 75 小时
- 寄托币
- 205
- 声望
- 5
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-26
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 155
- UID
- 2621347

- 声望
- 5
- 寄托币
- 205
- 注册时间
- 2009-3-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
1# nlhust
Language is the greatest distinction between humanity and other mammal animals because it enables human to exchange complex ideas and develop logical thinking. It plays an important role in the evolutional history of human society (the evolution of human society).应该是对人类社会的演化起着重要的作用吧。 People in different areas use different languages to communicate and write down their own stories and history for thousands of years. But now (However), with the rapid development of technology and economy, situation changes. But 是个连词,所以用于一个独立句的前面是不合适的Though being been listed (being listed) as intangible culture heritage, thousand kinds of lesser-known language are still endangered, and even worse, several indigenous languages have already extinct, just like what happened in Australia.
With the disappearing of languages may comes (come) the diminishment of cultures. Using the tool of language, our ancestors express their feelings orally, record their everyday life as well as their knowledge about the universe, and create poet, novels, and other performing arts. Through years of accumulation, every nation with a unique language has a rich culture heritage. However, once a kind of language extinct, we will lose the culture belong to it forever, since nobody could explain the meaning of it any more. We now could study the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle because Greek still exists. But what if Greek had disappeared before the theory of those great philosophers were translated into another language? Sometimes, even translation could not help us to preserve a certain aspect of a culture when its language is lost, as for language, it is a universal principle that each language has it unique phrase and expression that could never be replaced. The translation of Chinese poetry into English demonstrate (demonstrates) this point. 这一段主要阐释语言的消失会引起文明的陨落。但是我觉得这样不够透彻,文化的消亡对社会,对人类会有多大的影响呢?全世界有96%的语言可以被定义为lesser Known, 而这些语言大多数属于在游牧民族或者生活在及其偏远地区的人们的语言。他们鲜少和外界沟通,而且生产力十分落后,所以基本上对现代文明的发展机会没有起到过任何作用。对于这些只有一个部落大概1000多人掌握的语言,我们有什么理由一定要去保护他呢?
If these endangered languages extinct finally, people who are the native speaker of such lesser-known language will also lose their social identity. The culture extinction accompanies with the languages extinction. The loss of language equals to the loss of culture identity. Since it is the language and culture that help people define themselves, those, losing their mother tongue, could hardly find their status in the society. Some Australian aborigines are such victims. The invasion of British colonizer seriously diminished the number of Australian indigenous language, leaving lots of native children speaking only English. When growing up, these Australian find they are disdained by native English speakers and also hard to get alone with the older generations who are the native indigenous language speakers. Without their own language, how could these people tell what nation they belong to? 关于语言和认同感的问题,我觉得举土著被歧视的例子不是很有力。一个民族被另一个民族征服,被歧视,归根到底是因为生产力落后。如果他们在被侵占了之后,还是没有机会改善自己的生存状况,比如看出了自己民族和别人的差距,而努力学习,掌握了先进的科学文化知识,获得了体面的工作,客观的收入,他们还会因为是土著的原因而被人歧视吗?就算掌握了自己的语言,而别的方面没有改变,他们不会再被歧视,就会生活的好了吗?
Thus, in order to protect their culture as well as help their citizens win the social status, governments of countries which the endangered languages are spoken should do something to prevent their own languages from disappearing. They should do these because it is urgent to preserve the lesser-known culture right now, and the government is designed to make the decision that will benefit it citizens and improve the economy as well as popularize the nation's culture. What's more, having the power to distribute (of distributing) the national fund, only government could get enough money and human resources and then accomplish such a mission. Lesser-known的语言在一个国家使用的人相对而言还是很少的,拯救这样的语言也许对他的族人来说是好事,但是对其他公民是吗?而且国家为什么有责任呢?关于这些还是没有说清楚。
Some may argue that the endangered lesser-known languages don't worthy of this kind of the government's protection, as fewer languages means better and clearer communications among the majority of speakers and could accelerate the development of economy. But the loss of the diversity of languages will damage the culture variety, and to some extent, it may limited (limit) people's thought. No fresh ideas coming about might lead to the stop of social development, not mention to accelerate the global economy. Therefore, preserving their lesser-known language and promoting the communication of different culture might be the optimal choice for the governments.
这段转折还是挺好的,说明了这个问题的复杂性。但是我觉得纵观整篇文章,论述还是不能让人信服。涉及到的证据挺多,但是在证明自己观点的时候不深入。我好像变成给文章找茬了,但是这些问题也是我在写这篇issue的时候自己一直在想的问题,也是困扰我思维的问题。我觉得如果能把这些问题阐释清楚,肯定能让文章更加深刻的 |
|