【Try Best】第一小组 issue157 by 小红莓

小红莓UID：2641349

TOPIC: ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

Even though all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons, but I do not agree with the arguer’s opinion because comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.

Inevitably, all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons such as the observer's opinions, internal characteristics emotions, and so on. Before observation, the researcher has expectations and desires which may lead to a misleading illusion to the researcher himself and a biased result. Actually, as judged by different people, the wealth of everything is based on individual estimates of its value which is sharply differs in everyone. Because the evaluation may influenced by what happened to individuals, the result of observation of the same one may also changed as time goes by. As a consequence, the judgment and conclusion summed by everyone, and even those summed by the same one in different time, are also differs.

However, by detailed analysis of conclusions made by different researchers, one could make an objective judgment. Especially in the area of science and technology which is based on stubborn facts, detailed statistics and uncountable experiences, the observation is often certain because it is
based on precise measurement and cognitive skills which was approved for so long. If all observation is subjective, as the arguer said, how could we believe in anything existed? Without something purely objective, there may be no bases that we could regard as rules to judge the world

When one observe the world, he should not believe in all or nothing that the others presented because one should always have something he insist and have question about what he hear and what he see. It may be what so called belief. Only after carefully analysis of the objective world and the subjective conclusion made by others, one could have a relatively objective judgment.

As presented above, no one could make a hasty conclusion that all observation is subjective. Admittedly, observation always guided by the observer's expectations or desires, comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.

cababoUID：2648869

TOPIC: ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

Even though all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons, but I do not agree with the arguer’s opinion because comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.（Can we use “even though” and “but” in one sentence? ）

Inevitably, all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons such as the observer's opinions, internal characteristics emotions, and so on. Before observation, the researcher has expectations and desires which may lead to a misleading illusion to the researcher himself and a biased result. Actually, as judged by different people, the wealth of everything is based on individual estimates of its value which is sharply differs ( different)  in everyone. Because the evaluation may be influenced by what happened to individuals, the result of observation of the same one may also changed (change) as time goes by. As a consequence, the judgment and conclusion summed by everyone, and even those summed by the same one in different time, are also differs (different) .

However, by detailed analysis of conclusions made by different researchers, one could make an objective judgment. Especially in the area of science and technology which is based on stubborn( stubbon facts?...is this expression proper?)  facts, detailed statistics and uncountable experiences, the observation is often certain because it is
based on precise measurement and cognitive skills which was approved for so long. If all observation is subjective, as the arguer said, how could we believe in anything existed? Without something purely objective, there may be no bases that we could regard as rules to judge the world (I think “something purely objective” \= “ purely objective observation”….is it a little digression?)

When one observe the world, he should not believe in all or nothing that the others presented because one should always have something he insists and have question about what he hears and what he sees. It may be what so called belief. Only after carefully analysis of the objective world and the subjective conclusion made by others, one could have a relatively objective judgment.

As presented above, no one could make a hasty conclusion that all observation is subjective. Admittedly, observation always guided by the observer's expectations or desires, comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.

GG86_FlyUID：2641450

TOPIC: ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."

Even though all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons, but去掉 I do not agree with the arguer’s opinion because comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.

Inevitably, all observation is to some degree affected by some accidental reasons such as the observer's opinions, internal characteristics emotions, and so on. Before observation, the researcher has expectations and desires which may lead to a misleading illusion to the researcher himself and a biased result. Actually, as judged by different people, the wealth（value） of everything is based on individual estimation which is sharply different in everyone. Because the evaluation may be influenced by what happened to individuals, the result of observation of the same one may also change as time goes by. As a consequence, the judgment and conclusion summed by different people, or even those summed by the same one in different times, are also different.

However, by detailed analysis of conclusions made by different researchers, one could make an objective judgment. Especially in the area of science and technology which is based on stubborn? facts, detailed statistics and uncountable experiences, the observation is often certain because it is
based on precise measurement and cognitive skills which had been approved for so long. If all observation is subjective, as the arguer said, how could we believe in anything existed? Without something purely objective, there may be no bases that we could regard as rules to judge the world

When one observes the world, he or she should not believe in all or nothing that the others presented because one should always have something he insists
on and have question about what he heard and what he saw. It may be what so called belief. Only after carefully analysis of the objective world and the subjective conclusion made by others, one could have a relative objective judgment.

As presented above, no one could make a hasty conclusion that all observation is subjective. Admittedly, observation always guided by the observer's expectations or desires, comprehensive analysis may present an objective world to us.

论述的没有很好的证明你自己的观点。什么是comprehensive analysis? 为什么它能show a objective world to us?
And what we can do to get a comprehensive analysis and objective observation?