寄托天下
查看: 732|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【辉太郎杀G大队】7/8作业by hdsf2003 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
544
注册时间
2007-6-18
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-7-8 21:24:59 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Argument 15


The arguer tried to persuade investors not to hold the stock of Old Dairy. He presented the following statements to support his result. According a survey, 80% people prefer low fat and cholesterol food while Old Dairy makes many such food products, which means that this company will lost its sale greatly and the profits will meltdown. It is not easy to resist the tempting to accept this unconvincing idea. However, there are several unreasonable statements.

First of all, the authority of this survey is not totally believable. The arguer mentioned 80% respondents but fail to tell us how many people are involved and what the kinds of respondents are. Perhaps these people dislike fats and cholesterol for their weigh problem. As we know, young people seem to like fats and cholesterol. Furthermore, there are many other people who like this kind of food failing to be involved in this survey. In addition, the arguer didn't tell the concrete number of all respondents. If there are only ten people and eight of them dislike fats and cholesterol, the result of this survey has no practical value.

Secondly, the sales and profits may rise against the view of decreasing profits and sales. Old Dairy may have many kinds of products except the sort of high fats and cholesterol. The sort of high fats and cholesterol may be not the core products so that the profits and sales won't be affected severely. Moreover, perhaps this company lost its market share in one city, but it may get a much big market share in other cities. The pure profits and sales will increase instead of turning down.

Finally, Old Dairy may adjust its products in time and get more market share. The arguer gave an advice that people should sell their stock and even persuade others not to buy its stock. There is no convincing evident that the stock value will depreciate. On the contrary, if Old Dairy modifies its product structure, an obvious rise may come out.

To sum up, the arguer asked investor not to hold the Old Dairy stock for its high fats and cholesterol products. To do that, he must present a more detailed survey and category the products of Old Dairy to check it out that whether its stock will be affected by its high fats and cholesterol goods.


Issue 235

"Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty -whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force."

Maybe some of us have a common feeling that people become more skeptical than ever before. Therefore, belief and loyalty have been two critical issues which people are concerning with. The speaker acclaim that loyalty is frequently referred as to a negative force exerting on one's friends, employment and institution. I agree with this statement on some certain issues.

What invariably happens is that some companies often make a complaint of the leave of their employees. To vary degrees, all companies face the problems of intelligent loss at some time. As we know, if someone stays at one position too long, he or she will be tried of the work for its tedium and simply repeating operation. The way for him or her to find the passion is either to get a promotion or to leave the job. Usually, the chance of being promoted is very limited in one or two years for a common worker. That is why some people change their career in only one company and try to hunt a job in other companies.

Does it mean that it is really a bad thing for these corporations? The truth is that it is to some extent beneficial for long term development. For the companies itself, the manager can recruit more fresh men to fill the vacant. Some people will find that this is the right place for them to bring themselves into full play. Therefore, the fresh workers generally give us a impression that they always have enough energy to deal with a heavy task and show that they are actually the right persons to manage these programs. No boss doubts the passion of these fresh men for they are new engines boosting the forward of his company. In this case, some people who lack loyalty do be beneficial for a company.

For people who are very loyal, we never have the intention to critic them for they are our best friends. As social individuals, we cannot finish a complicated work only by ourselves and help from our friends is just like a cool bottle of water when we are moving arduously in a life-free desert. We need friends, especially loyal ones. No one expects that he has a long distant journey alone. Even if he does go out by himself, he will try to get along with the strangers beside him. Shortly afterwards, you will find that this man is not alone. What is more, we at times find that many people become good friends after their first meet. When some of us get in trouble, what we want is just a warm hand or firm eyes which encourage us to move on. Only can loyal friends always do that.

To sum up, it is absolutely right to teach people to be loyal to their friends but it should not be accused when people lack loyalty on their boring work.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
56
寄托币
790
注册时间
2009-7-7
精华
1
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2009-7-9 19:28:33 |只看该作者
Argument 15


The arguer tried to persuade investors not to hold the stock of Old Dairy. He presented the following statements to support his result. According a survey, 80% people prefer low fat and cholesterol food while Old Dairy makes many such food products, which means that this company will lost its sale greatly and the profits will meltdown. It is not easy to resist the tempting to accept this unconvincing idea(
我觉得这句话有问题。。。既然是unconvincing,为什么还要accept呢。。。). However, there are several unreasonable statements.

First of all, the authority of this survey is not totally believable. The arguer mentioned 80% respondents but fail(failed…) to tell us how many people are(were) involved and what the kinds of respondents are(??
我觉得你是想说what the ingrediants of the respondents 吧?或者说what kinds of respondents are… 尽管我认为kind这个单词很应该用sort来代替,但是很多文章我看都这么用,应该也没问题吧) Perhaps these people dislike fats and cholesterol for their weigh problem. As we know, young people seem to like fats and cholesterol这里的逻辑有问题吧。也许这些人不喜欢fats什么的,这句对,那为什么下面又说年轻人喜欢呢,跟上一句话没有关联的。并且as we know太口语化了,建议把这一句删掉。. Furthermore, there are(加个probably会不会好一些?)
many other people who like this kind of food failing to be involved in this survey. In addition, the arguer didn't tell the concrete number of all respondents. If there are only ten people and eight of them dislike fats and cholesterol, the result of this survey has no practical value.
(这个论点很好,我没有想到呢,学习拉~

Secondly, the sales and profits may rise against the view of decreasing profits and sales. Old Dairy may have many kinds of products except the sort of high fats and cholesterol. The sort of high fats and cholesterol may be not the core products so that the profits and sales won't be affected severely. Moreover, perhaps this company lost its market share in one city, but it may get a much big market share in other cities. The pure profits and sales will increase instead of turning down.
good point again!!!!我怎么没有想到呢,学习一下!!!!)

Finally, Old Dairy may adjust its products in time and get more market share. The arguer gave an advice that people should sell their stock and even persuade others not to buy its stock. There is no convincing evident that the stock value will depreciate
觉得这句话没有说完似的,可不可以改成,…will depreciate based on the given inputs?. On the contrary, if Old Dairy modifies its product structure, an obvious rise may come out.

To sum up, the arguer asked investor not to hold the Old Dairy stock for its high fats and cholesterol products. To do that, he must present a more detailed survey and category
觉得这个地方可以写得更详细一点的) the products of Old Dairy to check it out that whether its stock will be affected by its high fats and cholesterol goods.




Issue 235

"Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty -whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force."

Maybe some of us have a common feeling that people become more skeptical than ever before (

引入句很好). Therefore, belief and loyalty have been two critical issues which people are concerning觉得这个地方concerning应该改成concerned with. The speaker acclaim that loyalty is frequently referred as to a negative force exerting on one's friends, employment and institution. I agree with this statement on some certain issueson certain issues?? Or points?.

What invariably happens is that some companies often make a complaint of the leave of their employees. To vary degrees, all companies face the problems of intelligent loss at some time. As we know, if someone stays at one position too long, he or she will be tried
be tired,,, of the work for its tedium and simply repeating operation. The way for him or her to find the passion is either to get a promotion or to leave the job. Usually, the chance of being promoted is very limited in one or two years for a common worker. That is why some people change their career 我觉得career 这个次比较大,换个公司不等于换career, postion会不会好一点)in onlyonly? 好像不太通顺我觉得。。。)
one company and try to hunt a job in other companies.


Does it mean that it is really a bad thing for these corporations? The truth is that it is to some extent beneficial for long term development. For the companies itself, the manager can recruit more fresh men to fill the vacant. Some people will find that this is the right place for them to bring themselves into full play
这个词很好,学习一下). Therefore, the fresh workers generally give us a animpression that they always have enough energy to deal with a heavy task and show that they are actually the right persons to manage these programs. No boss doubts the passion of these fresh men for they are new engines boosting the forward of his company. In this case, some people who lack loyalty do be beneficial for a company.
(首先我觉得do be 这个用法我好像没见过。。。另外,这句话没写清楚吧。。。people who are not loyalty are beneficial for a company??? 还是the demission of the people who are not loyalty are beneficial for a company?

For people who are very loyal, we never have the intention to critic them for they are our best friends. As social individuals, we cannot finish a complicated work only by ourselves and help from our friends is just like a cool bottle of water when we are moving arduously in a life-free desert
metaphor用得很好). We need friends, especially loyal ones. No one expects that he has a long distant journey alone. Even if he does go out by himself, he will try to get along with the strangers beside him. Shortly afterwards, you will find that this man is not alone. What is more, we at times find that many people become good friends after their first meet. When some of us get in trouble, what we want is just a warm hand or firm eyes which encourage us to move on. Only can loyal friends always do that.

To sum up, it is absolutely right to teach people to be loyal to their friends but it should not be accused when people lack loyalty on their boring work.
觉得结尾写得有点逻辑问题。。。你的观点是对工作的缺乏忠诚,是值得原谅的。 那么你开头句说,你同意issue的观点,issue是说,忠诚会毁坏工作。。。这样的话有点矛盾。我建议你把开头改成那种保留式的吧,整体统一比较好。。。)

刚才看了一下你的提纲,你好象是部分赞同,可能我理解错了,那时不是第一段是说,I agree with this statement on some certain extent?

使用道具 举报

RE: 【辉太郎杀G大队】7/8作业by hdsf2003 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
【辉太郎杀G大队】7/8作业by hdsf2003
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-981299-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部