寄托天下
查看: 1085|回复: 4

[未归类] TOEFL暑期集结号作文 第2次作业 by DK [复制链接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
335
寄托币
3602
注册时间
2009-7-12
精华
0
帖子
31

US Applicant 枫华正茂

发表于 2009-7-15 20:10:14 |显示全部楼层
Should the government focus more on preserving nature environment and less on economic development?



1、讨论投资重点之前,先强调政府职能----可持续发展,所以两手都要抓,都要硬
2、忽略了经济建设会出现一个恶性循环
3、忽略了环境保护亦然
4、都重要,但是我们可以在保证经济缓慢增长的情况下,大力开展环境保护工程


Before talking about which side should government pay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable". So I think both protect nature environment and economic development are important equally.



Consider we pay more attention on save natural situation and ignore some development on economic. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. At that situation, government can not got enough taxes from the society, and the company will reduce the salary for their employees or even cut down some workers to save the cost, these workers will have no resource for live, even the government have not enough ability to help them, these people can aggravate the pressure of our society and finally build a vicious circle and cause a series of social problems such as robbery, murder and so on. This situation will more and more serious if we still pay less attention on economic program, so we can not ignore the importance of economic development.



On contrast, If we focus more on economic development what atmosphere we will live? There will be more factories than today, more emissions we will have which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the sea level will hoist which cause the coastal land inundated in it, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food. Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? We can not, so it is so terrible to underestimate the important of preserving nature environment.



Above all, we can not focus less on one while choose the other as the emphasize to develop, we must find a more flexible, feasible and sustainable way to progress our society. For example, we can try our best to preserving the natural situation while we can ensure the economy develop at a slow speed but never leave off.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
9
寄托币
2157
注册时间
2005-3-30
精华
0
帖子
25
发表于 2009-7-15 21:49:25 |显示全部楼层
DK 作业
Should the government focus more on preserving nature environment and less on economic development?



1、讨论投资重点之前,先强调政府职能----可持续发展,所以两手都要抓,都要硬5 z- e: |, H+ @* I0 }) K/ n
2、忽略了经济建设会出现一个恶性循环3 j+ V$ J9 O1 B1 a1 ?* b9 x
3、忽略了环境保护亦然
4、都重要,但是我们可以在保证经济缓慢增长的情况下,大力开展环境保护工程


Before talking about which side should government pay more attention to, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable". So I think both protecting nature environment and economic development are important equally。平衡观点

Consider we pay more attention on save natural situation and ignore some development on economic. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. At that situation, government can not got enough taxes from the society, and the company will reduce the salary for their employees or even cut down some workers to save the cost, these workers will have no resource for live, even the government have not enough ability to help them, these people can aggravate the pressure of our society and finally build a vicious circle and cause a series of social problems such as robbery, murder and so on. This situation will more and more serious if we still pay less attention on economic program, so we can not ignore the importance of economic development.这段的对比用的不错噢!其实我认为你的TS不太好,你只要说明ignore development of economy 的危害就行了,不用说什么more attention to protecting the environment,因为我一开始时候就觉得你好像是说,因为环境的投入太多了造成了经济危机什么的!




On contrast, If we focus more on economic development what atmosphere we will live? There will be more factories than today, more emissions we will have which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the sea level will hoist which cause the coastal land inundated in it, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food. Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? We can not, so it is so terrible to underestimate the important of preserving nature environment.
我认为你的对比这种方式写的很好,表扬一个!

Above all, we can not focus less on one while choose the other as the emphasize to develop, we must find a more flexible, feasible and sustainable way to progress our society. For example, we can try our best to preserving the natural situation while we can ensure the economy develop at a slow speed but never leave off.

总体上很好,结构很清晰,而且论述比较细致,我很喜欢这样的,呵呵,不错不错噢!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
114
注册时间
2008-10-9
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-7-18 22:59:03 |显示全部楼层
Before talking about which side should government pay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable". So I think both protect nature environment and economic development are important equally.

When coming to the topic about which problem should government spend more effort, the environmental preservation or economic development, I want to emphasize the importance of a balanced effort toward a sustainable development.

Consider we pay more attention on save natural situation and ignore some development on economic. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. At that situation, government can not got enough taxes from the society, and the company will reduce the salary for their employees or even cut down some workers to save the cost, these workers will have no resource for live, even the government have not enough ability to help them, these people can aggravate the pressure of our society and finally build a vicious circle and cause a series of social problems such as robbery, murder and so on. This situation will more and more serious if we still pay less attention on economic program, so we can not ignore the importance of economic development.

On the one hand, if the government overemphasizes preserving the natural environment development and thus limits the economic development, we will suffer a lot from an lagging economy. Under that situation, government would not have enough tax revenue to cover the running cost, companies would cut down the payment for works and even lay off some to reduce the cost. Those laid off would experience a hard time as they could receive little from the burdened government. The unemployment crisis would further evolve into a vicious cycle and engender severe social problems such as robbery, murder.

On contrast, If we focus more on economic development what atmosphere we will live? There will be more factories than today, more emissions we will have which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the sea level will hoist which cause the coastal land inundated in it, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food. Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? We can not, so it is so terrible to underestimate the important of preserving nature environment.

on the other hand, if we completely focus on economic development and ignore our surrounding environment, the outcome can be even more disasterous. Just consider the green house effect as an example. Without coordinated efforts, it is likely that in the nearby future the coastal land would inundate beneath the elevated sea level, the climate pattern was altered in such a large extent that it would endanger our agricultural production and production. Is it possible for us to buy food or a green sky with money? The answer is quite definite, so we can not bear to neglect the environment preservation.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
335
寄托币
3602
注册时间
2009-7-12
精华
0
帖子
31

US Applicant 枫华正茂

发表于 2009-7-19 09:49:08 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 DriftKing 于 2009-7-21 21:25 编辑

Before talking about which side should government pay more attention, nature environment or economic development, I want to emphasize what is the government's primary responsibility at first, that is "develop our society sustainable". So I think both protect nature environment and economic development are important equally.

When coming to the topic about which problem should government spend more effort, the environmental preservation or economic development, I want to emphasize the importance of a balanced effort toward a sustainable development.

p4 ~! k+ z) R- C" Q
Consider we pay more attention on save natural situation and ignore some development on economic. Obviously, we can receive more fresh water, clean air, active animals, however, we should also meet the pressure of economic depression. At that situation, government can not got enough taxes from the society, and the company will reduce the salary for their employees or even cut down some workers to save the cost, these workers will have no resource for live, even the government have not enough ability to help them, these people can aggravate the pressure of our society and finally build a vicious circle and cause a series of social problems such as robbery, murder and so on. This situation will more and more serious if we still pay less attention on economic program, so we can not ignore the importance of economic development.9 O( \! A/ T; l7 O( V# V

On the one hand, if the government overemphasizes preserving the natural environment development and thus limits the economic development, we will suffer a lot from an lagging economy. Under that situation, government would not have enough tax revenue to cover the running cost, companies would cut down the payment for works and even lay off some to reduce the cost. Those laid off would experience a hard time as they could receive little from the burdened government. The unemployment crisis would further evolve into a vicious cycle and engender severe social problems such as robbery, murder.

t& U
On contrast, If we focus more on economic development what atmosphere we will live? There will be more factories than today, more emissions we will have which contain carbon dioxide in it. Greenhouse effect will be intensified which cause the situation we live in warmer and warmer than ever before. A lot of bad effects will follow, such as the sea level will hoist which cause the coastal land inundated in it, climate changes or we can only see the snow through TV in the future, less food we can eat, so more and more people will be threaten by not enough food. Is money also useful at that time, can we buy more region from sea, or buy snow from the sky or even buy food from the earth? We can not, so it is so terrible to underestimate the important of preserving nature environment. " Q# N$ B! Q& m) N! g5 P

on the other hand, if we completely focus on economic development and ignore our surrounding environment, the outcome can be even more disastrous. Just consider the green house effect as an example. Without coordinated efforts, it is likely that in the nearby future the coastal land would be inundated beneath the elevated sea level, the climate pattern was altered in such a large extent that it would endanger our agricultural production and production. Is it possible for us to buy food or a green sky with money? The answer is quite definite, so we can not bear to neglect the environment preservation.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
335
寄托币
3602
注册时间
2009-7-12
精华
0
帖子
31

US Applicant 枫华正茂

发表于 2009-7-19 09:53:40 |显示全部楼层
3# dingxiangzi

非常感谢 dingxiangzi 同学 你的英语表达 真的很地道

使用道具 举报

RE: TOEFL暑期集结号作文 第2次作业 by DK [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
TOEFL暑期集结号作文 第2次作业 by DK
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-984278-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部