Argument写的时候他因法重全面还是重丰满？

kay8815UID: 2668603

一段里的他因法是要写3，4个把可能性写尽量全一些还是逮住一个俩使劲说，说明白了？如果我只写一个写的很细致可以吗？都要考了 请帮忙解答

elmananaUID: 2629396

说两点体会吧：  1   抓主要矛盾。  2  大力分析主要矛盾。
全不如专，完全的无背景考试，只要你抓住一点深入分析能削弱原命题照样得高分。

草木也知愁UID: 2487572

be developed
be sufficient

永远不要蜻蜓点水

kay8815UID: 2668603

To begin with, the validity of the survey is open to questions. The author tells us little about the survey except the result.  However, we do not know when, to whom and how the survey was conducted. If the survey was conducted ten years ago, the historical change obviously undermines the conclusion since that during so long time, people may change their habit a lot. Second, the author fail to pay attention to the geography factors, the national survey's result does not mean that every part of the nation share the same characteristic, and perhaps man in our area does not like the sport program really. Third, there is little sign of the process of random sampling so that we have good reason to doubt if people who response the survey can reflect all the man's opinion as a whole. These three kinds of information, unfortunately, though being very important to the conclusion, are rarely mentioned in the argument.比如这段 是别人写的 算不算展开了？还是说这里分开的123点也要再详细一些？