寄托天下
查看: 1144|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

issue83 同主题,必互拍 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
230
注册时间
2005-6-7
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2005-8-4 00:02:16 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Issue83  第6篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
Position: agree
1、        现在wildness areas受破坏的情况很严重,政府应引起重视。
2、        保护wildness areas的原始状态对人类是有好处的。
A.        保存了大量的原始资源
B.        可以发展旅游等,创收,解决社会问题。
3、政府应该从强化保护意识和颁布法令两方面入手。
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
With the rapid decrease of wilderness areas in the world, more attention has been paid on wilderness areas preservation. In this very issue, the speaker asserts that wilderness areas even which are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people should be preserved in their natural state by the government. I totally agree with this assertion for the reasons below.

Firstly, as we see nowadays, preservation of wilderness areas have been one of the most important problems we human beings confront. According an authoritative research, wildness areas disappear in a rapid speed. Consider that a large area of rain forests in the world  have been cut down, and that more than 1000 kinds of animals are extinct of the world each year, and the case might be even worse in the foreseeable future. In my view, this situation might be consequence of two main causes. The one is that with the rapid development of scientific technology, our environments seem so weak compared to the destructive power of advanced instruments made by humans. As a result, some technologies make it possible to destroy a large area of wilderness in a short time. The other reason is that the method of protecting environment is undermining, instead a benefit-aimed method is dominating. Many individuals, corporations and factories would like to satisfy their own benefits even at the expense of eliminating wilderness areas. Therefore, it is necessary and pressing for the governments to take some active action to save our environments, especially the wildness areas..

However, some persons would argue that there are so many pressing social problems we must firstly deal with, like unemployment, economy, and so forth, that no more attention can be paid on the preservation of wilderness areas by the governments. Yet in my opinion, this point is not farseeing. Preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would be beneficial to human beings in a long-term run. First, wilderness areas in a natural state would preserve many precious resources for our human beings. For instance, these areas are considered to be a good storage of natural genes for human researches. Furthermore, to take advantage of the natural resource, people there could develop tourism which might bring them a lot of job openings and great profits. Consequently, some social problems including unemployment and poverty can be well solved in this way. Accordingly, preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would benefit us human beings in a long-term development.

Another problem the government must emphasize is how to in a effective way preserve the wildness areas in a natural state. I think there are two factors we must account for. First, the significance to preserve wildness areas in a natural state must be indoctrinated to every person. Only when people recognize that wildness areas are treasures for them, will they try their best to protect them. Moreover, some active acts are needed to be carried out especially for the areas accessible to a large number of persons. It is only through stringent acts that people can be effectively prevented from doing any harm to the wilderness. In a word, I firmly recommend to the government that it is necessary to take affirmative measures like above right now.

In sum, since the wilderness areas in a natural state would benefit us human beings not only because they are helpful for us to know about the nature but also because they would help to settle some social problems, the government should take immediate and effective measures to preserve them in a nature state whether they are remote or

[ Last edited by staralways on 2005-8-4 at 13:42 ]
星星之火,可以燎原
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
1691
注册时间
2005-4-4
精华
1
帖子
8
沙发
发表于 2005-8-4 10:18:20 |只看该作者
Issue83  第6篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
Position: agree
1、        现在wildness areas受破坏的情况很严重,政府应引起重视。
2、        保护wildness areas的原始状态对人类是有好处的。
A.        保存了大量的原始资源
B.        可以发展旅游等,创收,解决社会问题。
3、政府应该从强化保护意识和颁布法令两方面入手。
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
With the rapid decrease of wilderness areas in the world, more attention has been paid on wilderness areas preservation. In this very issue, the speaker asserts that wilderness areas even which are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people should be preserved in their natural state by the government. I totally agree with this assertion for the reasons below.

Firstly, as we see nowadays, preservation of wilderness areas have been one of the most important problems we human beings confront. According an authoritative research, wildness areas disappear in a rapid speed. Consider that a large area of rain forests in the world  have been cut down, and that more than 1000 kinds of animals are extinct to be extinct of the worldin the world each year, and the case might be even worse in the foreseeable future. In my view, this situation might be the consequence of two main causes用result from未尝不可. The one is that with the rapid development of scientific technology, our environments seem so weak vulnerable compared to the destructive power of advanced instruments made by humans. As a result, some technologies make it possible to destroy a large area of wilderness in a short time. The other reason is that the method of protecting environment is undermining, instead a benefit-aimed method is dominating. Many individuals, corporations and factories would like to satisfy their own benefits even at the expense of eliminating wilderness areas. Therefore, it is necessary and pressing for the governments to take some active actions to save our environments, especially the wildness areas..

However, some persons would argue that there are so many pressing social problems we must firstly deal with, like unemployment, economy, and so forth, that no more attention can be paid on the preservation of wilderness areas by the governments. Yet in my opinion, this point is not farseeing. Preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would be beneficial to human beings in a long-term run. First, wilderness areas in a natural state would preserve many precious resources for our human beings. For instance, these areas are considered to be a good storage of natural genes for human researches. Furthermore, to take advantage of the natural resource, people there could develop tourism which might bring them a lot of job openings and great profits. Consequently, some social problems including unemployment and poverty can be well solved in this way. Accordingly, preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would benefit us human beings in a long-term development.

Another problem the government must emphasize is how to in a effective way preserve the wildness areas in a natural state. I think there are two factors we must account for. First, the significance to preserve wildness areas in a natural state must be indoctrinated to every person. Only when people recognize that wildness areas are treasures for them, will they try their best to protect them. Moreover, some active acts are needed to be carried out especially for the areas accessible to a large number of persons. It is only through stringent acts that people can be effectively prevented from doing any harm to the wilderness. In a word, I firmly recommend to the government that it is necessary to take affirmative measures like above right now.

In sum, since the wilderness areas in a natural state would benefit us human beings not only because they are helpful for us to know about the nature but also because they would help to settle some social problems, the government should take immediate and effective measures to preserve them in a nature state whether they are remote or没写完?

全文论证还是比较有条理的,但是例证似乎比较少~~~我也正打算写这个文章,不能给你太多建议,抱歉~~~
临渊羡鱼 不如退而结网......

宝剑锋从磨砺出,梅花香自苦寒来

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
161
注册时间
2005-5-17
精华
0
帖子
1
板凳
发表于 2005-8-4 20:31:20 |只看该作者
Issue83  第6篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
Position: agree
1、        现在wildness areas受破坏的情况很严重,政府应引起重视。
2、        保护wildness areas的原始状态对人类是有好处的。
A.        保存了大量的原始资源
B.        可以发展旅游等,创收,解决社会问题。
3、政府应该从强化保护意识和颁布法令两方面入手。
------题目------
Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people.
------正文------
With the rapid decrease of wilderness areas in the world, more attention has been paid on wilderness areas preservation. In this very issue, the speaker asserts that wilderness areas even which are extremely remote and accessible to only a few people should be preserved in their natural state by the government. I totally agree with this assertion for the reasons below.第二句,我认为应该这样写...wilderness areas, even those extremely remote and accessible to only a few people, should be ....

Firstly, as we see nowadays, preservation of wilderness areas have been one of the most important problems we human beings confront. According to an authoritative research, wildness areas disappear in a rapid speed. 有“快速的速度”这样说法吗?呵呵,high speed ,startling speed Consider that a large area of rain forests in the world  have been cut down, and that more than 1000 kinds of animals are extinct of the world each year, and the case might be even worse in the foreseeable future. In my view, this situation might be consequence of two main causes. The one is that with the rapid development of scientific technology, our environments不知道能不能用复数? seem so weak compared to the destructive power of advanced instruments made by humans. As a result, some technologies make it possible to destroy a large area of wilderness in a short time. The other reason is that the method of protecting environment is undermining, instead a benefit-aimed method is dominating. 读得很别扭,也有点费解,Many individuals, corporations and factories would like to satisfy their own benefits even at the expense of eliminating wilderness areas. Therefore, it is necessary and pressing for the governments to take some active action to save our environments, especially the wildness areas..
既然之说了一点就转折了,前面一段不用firstly了吧
However, some persons peoplewould argue that there are so many pressing social problems we must firstly deal with, like unemployment, economy, and so forth, that no more attention can be paid on the preservation of wilderness areas by the governments. Yet in my opinion, this point is not farseeing. Preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would be beneficial to human beings in a long-term run. First, wilderness areas in a natural state would preserve many precious resources for our our不要human beings. For instance, these areas are considered to be a good storage of natural genes for human researches. Furthermore, to take advantage of the natural resource, people there could develop tourism which might bring them a lot of job openings and great profits. Consequently, some social problems including unemployment and poverty can be well solved in this way. Accordingly, preserving wilderness areas in their natural state would benefit us human beings in a long-term development.总是想说“我们某某”,太中式了,呵呵

Another problem the government must emphasize is how to in a effective way preserve effectively preserve就完了the wildness areas in a natural state. I think there are two factors we must account for. First, the significance to preserve wildness areas in a natural state must be indoctrinated to every person. Only when people recognize that wildness areas are treasures for them, will they try their best to protect them. Moreover, some active acts are needed to be carried out especially for the areas accessible to a large number of persons. It is only through stringent acts that people can be effectively prevented from doing any harm to the wilderness. In a word, I firmly recommend to recommend to 是交付的意思,表乱用the government that it is necessary to take affirmative measures like above right now.

In sum, since the wilderness areas in a natural state would benefit us human beings 不说啥了,改吧not only because they are helpful for us to know about the nature but also because they would help to settle some social problems, the government should take immediate and effective measures to preserve them in a nature state whether they are remote or
三段的关系:firstly×××,however***,another。。。是不是稍微乱了点?动笔之前好好整理一下逻辑,不要想到哪写到哪。虽然意思基本都表达对了,但是很多句子都很中式,读着不太舒服。说话得稍微有点狠,楼主勿怪
东隅已失,桑榆非晚

8月19日 广州

使用道具 举报

RE: issue83 同主题,必互拍 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue83 同主题,必互拍
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-311295-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部