Issue5 Baxia 第五次作业

Anny.Y.WangUID: 2178596

呵呵   第五次作业了，感觉越来越不会用句子表达了， 我觉得提纲还好，就是句子用得不好， 大家多提建议哦！

Issue 5 A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
提纲: 1. 摆明态度, 有好处有坏处;
2. 好处, 对学生可以学到相同的知识, 对家长不用担心孩子教育不同, 对学校教育的基础一样, 对社会有利于传递相同的价值观等.
3. 坏处, 会掩盖政府的不足之处,会使各地的特色遗失, 会使其他的教育者丢失教学兴趣.
4. 总结, 都有好处, 要协调发展.

The author asserts that it is better for all students up until college to study the same national curriculums than to study academic courses determined by different regions, According to my understanding, students around the nation taught the same courses is so extremely that educators should synthesize the two forms of curriculums.  

First, under certain circumstances it is very useful to offer students with the sane national curriculums. To students, as they are given the same courses, it is equal for everyone and they can communicate with each other without any problems. To parents, they will not be worried about that their children do not learn as much knowledge as others. To schools before colleges, it is not necessary for them to employ advisors and psychologists to make special plans for their own students, and students who enter colleges for further study have the same basic knowledge, it is easy for teachers to teach . What’s more, it is convenience for the government to transfer core values upon which any democratic society depended to thrive., religion and so forth, the society will be more harmonious.

However, it also has side effects to make all the courses all the same. Perhaps there exist a number of minorities, they have their own languages and customs handed down from generations to generations. The government’s “all the same” action will to some extent inhibit the development of the minority specialties. On the other hand, government will keep something, which is mot merely useless but harmful back from the society. People will not know what really happens to the society. What’s more, educators will partly lose the enthusiasms to teaching, because they are not allowed to practice their ways to teach, so some experienced teachers will turn to other jobs.

To sum up, government should formulate core curriculums for every student in order that all students will have the same foundational knowledge, moreover, different parts of the nation are allowed to determine which academic courses to offer according to their own situations. In short, we should develop various education forms based on the same basic knowledge. And it is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leaves the rest up to each state- or better yet, to each community.

[ 本帖最后由 staralways 于 2006-2-7 20:25 编辑 ]

Anny.Y.WangUID: 2178596

这次的发稿格式对了吗？？？我很想改正的呢！
各位斑竹辛苦啦！！

forevercocoUID: 149574

Issue 5Baxia 第五次作业 Anny

呵呵   第五次作业了，感觉越来越不会用句子表达了， 我觉得提纲还好，就是句子用得不好， 大家多提建议哦！

Issue 5 A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
提纲: 1. 摆明态度, 有好处有坏处;
2. 好处, 对学生可以学到相同的知识, 对家长不用担心孩子教育不同, 对学校教育的基础一样, 对社会有利于传递相同的价值观等.
3. 坏处, 会掩盖政府的不足之处,会使各地的特色遗失, 会使其他的教育者丢失教学兴趣.
4. 总结, 都有好处, 要协调发展.

The author asserts that it is better for all students up until college to study the same national curriculums than to study academic courses determined by different regions, According to my understanding, students around[around好像不是很恰当] the nation taught the same courses is so extremely[extreme,这里应该是adj., extremely是adv.] that educators should synthesize the two forms of curriculums.
  
[TS写的不是很好，按照TS的逻辑结构，]students around the nation taught the same courses is so extremely[所对应的应该是论述统一课程的极端性，而后]educators should synthesize the two forms of curriculums.[说的是应该将两种课程综合起来，这样一来，和提纲就不甚符合了.]建议改成: Though national curriculum is beneficial to students in many aspects, it indeed has some limitations can be covered by local curriculum. [大概就是这个意思，还可以写的更饱满一些，把好处和局限性都简略的协一下。]

First, under certain circumstances it is very useful to offer students with the sane [same]national curriculums[复数形式curricula]. To students, as they are given the same courses, [As students are given the same course,] it is equal for everyone and they can communicate with each other[each other改成others] without any problems. To[For] parents, they will not be worried about[去掉about] that their children do not learn as much knowledge as others. To[For] schools before colleges, it is not necessary for them to employ advisors and psychologists to make special plans for their own students, and students who enter colleges for further study have the same basic knowledge, it is easy for teachers to teach . What’s more, it is convenience for the government to transfer core values upon which any democratic society depended to thrive., religion and so forth, the society will be more harmonious.

However, it also has side effects to make all the courses all[这个all去掉] the same. Perhaps there exist a number of minorities, they have their own languages and customs handed down from generations to generations[好像是from generation to generation,]. The government’s “all the same” action will to some extent inhibit the development of the minority specialties. On the other hand, government will keep something, which is mot[most or what?] merely useless but harmful back from the society.[这一句的意思看不明白] People will not know what really happens to the society. What’s more, educators will partly lose the enthusiasms to teaching, because they are not allowed to practice their ways to teach, so some experienced teachers will turn to other jobs.[这个思路不错，但是结论] so some experienced teachers will turn to other jobs.[和]educators will partly lose the enthusiasms to teaching[这个观点不符，而且过于绝对了。Body段的第一句和最后一句都是比较重要的，应该好好斟酌一下]

To sum up, government should formulate[formulate用的很好] core curriculums for every student in order that all students will have the same foundational knowledge, moreover, different parts of the nation are allowed to determine which academic courses to offer according to their own situations. In short, we should develop various education forms based on the same basic knowledge. And it is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leaves the rest up to each state- or better yet, to each community.

freud5027UID: 2165870

The author asserts that it is better for all students up until college to study the same national curriculums than to study academic courses determined by different regions, According to my understanding, students around the nation taught the same courses is so extremely that educators should synthesize the two forms of curriculums.  

First, under certain circumstances it is very useful to offer students with the sane national curriculums. To students, as they are given the same courses, it is equal for everyone and they can communicate with each other without any problems. To parents, they will not be worried about that their children do not learn as much knowledge as others <they need not worry if their children...或是they will not be worried about their children's not learning...>To schools before colleges, it is not necessary for them to employ advisors and psychologists<请心理学家做什么特殊计划？> to make special plans for their own students<我觉得应该说这样就易于在入学面试时对学生的学习情况进行横向评估，不用再请专业人士根据生源所学内容的差异进行分层>, and students who enter colleges for further study have the same basic knowledge, it is easy for teachers to teach . What's(what is) more, it is convenience (of convenience/convenient) for the government to transfer core values upon which any democratic society<我觉得对于一先目前仍处于混乱中的非民主国家，可能垄断教育更为重要吧> depended to thrive, religion and so forth, the society will be more harmonious.

However, it also has side effects to make all the courses all the same. Perhaps there exist a number of minorities, they have their own languages and customs handed down from generations to generations. The government’s “all the same” action will to some extent inhibit the development of the minority specialties. On the other hand, government will keep something, which is mot merely useless but harmful back from the society. <前后两句感觉少了点连贯性>People will not know what really happens to the society. What’s more, educators will partly lose the enthusiasms to teaching, because they are not allowed to practice their ways to teach<就算教学内容是相同的，形式还是可以丰富多彩的，这取决于教师本身对课程的理解和教学技巧>, so some experienced teachers will turn to other jobs.<这段有点乱，像是硬把3个不足之处凑在一起，而不是顺着思路下来>

To sum up, government should formulate core curriculums for every student in order that all students will have the same foundational knowledge, moreover, different parts of the nation are allowed to determine which academic courses to offer according to their own situations<应该再花点笔墨写为什么给地方一定自由根据其自身情况设置部分课程是好的，这点我自己写的时候，也没怎么提到，再想想吧>. In short, we should develop various education forms based on the same basic knowledge. And it is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leaves the rest up to each state- or better yet, to each community.<这句不错>

总体感觉还有点乱，另外内容不够充实，自然字数也比较少……