issue48 欢迎拍拍~

hermione371UID: 2276572

ISSUE48 - "The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."         
DATE: 2007-3-22
According to this statement, it is the multitude, instead of the key individuals, made significant historical events and trends possible, therefore the study of history should pay more attention on the mass population. I turn to oppose to the speaker's contention as he neglects the main affect of vanguards and the determing tole they play in the history. While the mass population is the main force to maintain and aggrandize history and their influence are undeniable, we should not lose the sight of the fact that without the stood-out of an vanguard, history would not be like we see today, but shaped in a tremendously different way.
      I follow the reasoning that vanguards provides the essential impetus and blow a fuse of an historical event. If we cast a look back at history, it is possible to identify that most of mass movements were sponsored by someone, who can either adumbrate the future trend or be intolerated with contemporary circumstances, and had a will to change current situation, such as The Russian October Revolution which was a coup d'etat by the Bolsheviks under Lenin in November 1917 that led to a period of civil war which ended in victory for the Bolsheviks in 1922. Obviously, the affect of the leader, Lenin, was inextricably related to the final success and the beginning of this movement which once changed a nation’s political structure and cutural traditions. In other words, this is nowhere more true that Lenin is the crucial aspect of the whole movement and shows us a model example to study and admire of.
     In a dissimilary way of history in the realm of science, the favouritism over the famous few is even more justifiable. Admittedly, almost all the key breakthroughs or major discoveries in sophisticated area are attributed to certain key individuals, such as, the discovery of J particle by famous physicist, Ding Zhaozhong, the found of Evolutionary of creatures by a biologist, Darwin and what you have. Their unusual experience, some left controversial queries, some encourages us to go on and some warns us; their erudite knowledge leads to the path of development of history. Without these iluuminatis, the textbooks will be filled with emptiness and our study of scientific development will be left with nothing to focus on, and the evidence of the progress will be hidden in the ocean of history.
      Nevertheless, that is not to say multitude is no use at all on the path of history. When it comes to the achievement, the contributions and efforts made by mass are undeniable for which they gets themselves into the realization of one significant historical event. The first president of China once said that mass population is the main force to push the waves of history. The saying is used invariably to point out that the power of mass population is the basis to lead to the success of one achivement.
   To sum up, with few exceptions, key individuals are shaping and creationg history, however, to ignore the effect of either nameless mass population or famous group leaders is unwise, for both of them make great contribution to the realization of history and to continue understanding history chiefly in terms of their influence..

napUID: 196976

ISSUE48- "The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. Themost significant events and trends in history were made possible not bythe famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long beenforgotten."         
DATE: 2007-3-22
According to thisstatement, it is the multitude, instead of the key individuals, madesignificant historical events and trends possible, therefore the studyof history should pay more attention on the mass population. I turn tooppose to the speaker's contention as he neglects the main affect ofvanguards and the determing tole they play in the history. While themass population is the main force to maintain and aggrandize historyand their influence are undeniable, we should not lose the sight of thefact that without the stood-out of an vanguard, history would not belike we see today, but shaped in a tremendously different way.

      I follow thereasoning that vanguards provides the essential impetus and blow a fuseof an historical event. If we cast a look back at history, it ispossible to identify that most of mass movements were sponsored bysomeone, who can either adumbrate the future trend or be intoleratedwith contemporary circumstances, and had a will to change currentsituation, such as The Russian October Revolution which was a coupd'etat by the Bolsheviks under Lenin in November 1917 that led to aperiod of civil war which ended in victory for the Bolsheviks in 1922.Obviously, the affect of the leader, Lenin, was inextricably related tothe final success and the beginning of this movement which once changeda nation’s political structure and cutural traditions. In other words,this is nowhere more true that Lenin is the crucial aspect of the wholemovement and shows us a model example to study and admire of.
似乎没看出来Lenin的作用，最好提一句

     In a dissimilary(没用错词吧？我感觉后面在说是key individuals的关键作用) wayof history in the realm of science, the favouritism over the famous fewis even more justifiable. Admittedly(总感觉是要转折), almost all the key breakthroughsor major discoveries in sophisticated area are attributed to certainkey individuals, such as, the discovery of J particle by famousphysicist, Ding Zhaozhong, the found of Evolutionary of creatures by abiologist, Darwin and what you have. Their unusual experience, someleft controversial queries, some encourages us to go on and some warnsus; their erudite knowledge leads to the path of development ofhistory. Without these iluuminatis, the textbooks will be filled withemptiness and our study of scientific development will be left withnothing to focus on, and the evidence of the progress will be hidden inthe ocean of history.

      Nevertheless, that isnot to say multitude is no use at all on the path of history. When itcomes to the achievement, the contributions and efforts made by massare undeniable for which they gets themselves into the realization ofone significant historical event. The first president of China oncesaid that mass population is the main force to push the waves ofhistory(引用这个名人的话好象力度不够，来点论证吧，或example). The saying is used invariably to point out that the power ofmass population is the basis to lead to the success of one achivement.

   To sum up, (建议加个表转折的副词，要不认为这些exception与后面的是一致的)with fewexceptions, key individuals are shaping and creationg history, however,to ignore the effect of either nameless mass population or famous groupleaders is unwise, for both of them make great contribution to therealization of history and to continue understanding history chiefly interms of their influence..



https://bbs.gter.net/thread-632454-1-1.html
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-633083-1-1.htm
lhttps://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=633936

[ 本帖最后由 nap 于 2007-3-23 21:24 编辑 ]