【备考日志】草莓酱拌饭小组 BY AllseeEyes——后进生

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

【备考日志】草莓酱拌饭小组 BY AllseeEyes——后进生
其实我早该在半年以前就开始准备GRE了，我渴望飞跃，但是源自我内心的胆怯一直阻挠着我。是恐惧，让我一次又一次的选择逃避。离1006G越来越近，我也就越来越紧张。我无时无刻在同自己的心魔作斗争。
今天早上，我照例怀着忐忑的心情打开GTER.NET，胆怯又一次让我将鼠标点向“GRE考试综合论坛”和“商学院、经济”，想要再次去浏览那些经验以慰藉我浮躁而紧张的心。但是我看见了作文互动右边一行醒目的字眼“10 06G 草莓酱拌饭组 招新帖”。内心一种强烈的驱使，让我点开了这一页。
这一页，对有些人来说，只是几行C语言字句
这一页，对有些人来说，只是许许多多招新贴之中的普通一页
但是对我，这一页像刺股的锥子刺醒了我沉睡的欲望，像干将莫邪锋芒毕露般驱走了我内心的胆怯。
这一页，将是我学习生涯中崭新的一页！


我按照要求，认真阅读了附件给出的官方说明。
针对我个人的情况，我对Issue以及argument作出以下认识：
（1）在Issue这一块，通过官方说明，我深刻的认识到Issue不仅仅是写作，我练习Issue不仅仅是为写作而写作。Issue有别于一般意义上的国内英语作文考试，国内的英语作文考试只需要用描述性语言描述某件事物或者叙述一件事情，很少需要完整地发表个人立场的时候。Issue的不同之处在于辩证看待问题，并分析可能出现的观点，然后提出自己的见解，再旁征博引来支持自己提出的见解。
这种辩证的、逻辑的思维我具备一些，但是不完善也不系统。这要求我在今后练习Issue的过程中，要格外注重理解辩证思维。另外，issue中所需要的“旁征博引”，也要求我在日常的学习和生活中，不能成为“书呆子”，要合理运用学术上的知识和生活中的道理。
（2）argument相比issue需要更敏锐的逻辑思维。通过范例可以看出，题给观点貌似是正确的，而我们的任务，就是发现该观点论据、论证、结论的内在逻辑矛盾，找出真正的原因。
在这一方面，我认为我自己有极大的欠缺。看了好几个范例，我都不能分析出正确的关系。所以，我要认真学习范例，还要多向GTER前辈们请教，争取早日突破这一难关。


实际上，以上辩证逻辑、论据观点的欠缺，都是属于软件的欠缺。这正是我要在今后与各位志同道合的GTERS交流、学习的。另外一个很重要的硬件欠缺——词汇量。这只能是靠我自己来完成的，任何人都帮不了我。
我在漫漫考G路上只是一名新兵，很多很多东西都不懂。在英语基础上，我比这里很多人都差，但是我愿意以真诚的态度来对待考G！我愿意听从组长对考G大方向的安排和计划，再根据自己的实际情况灵活设计每天、每周的小安排、小计划，充分利用空闲时间，坚持完成小组的写作任务，积极与各位交流经验探讨方法，认认真真准备来年的1006G！

ddcmj519UID: 176326

加油~~
best wishes~

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

谢谢组长~

stupidsteveUID: 2704849

组长，我也要加入！！！
咳咳...不到十分钟就就要返校了...日志或许写不完了，晚上一定会补上的！！！
AW，是一种最富回报的提高过程，只是，许多人并不在乎为之付出了多少。
大家加油！

单眼皮vs肿眼皮UID: 2705887

:handshake

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

昨天，我再次阅读了关于AW的有关资料，才发现我第一天读了组长给的官方说明得到的理解多么肤浅。
（或许我今天的理解依然肤浅，但我希望明天我的认识能够更加深刻）
由于我的英文水平非常非常的菜鸟，官方说明看得云里雾里，好歹也算看了个大概明白，昨天我阅读了中文说明，对AW认识得到了进一步的深入
首先，总结我那天的理解，ISSUE是立论文，ARGUMENT是驳论文。
ARGUMENT的难度要小于ISSUE，所以，引用书上原话“保A争I”

另外。。。我现在才知道AW的全部题库都已经给出了。。。只要功夫深，挨着练习的话，一定能在AW上取得好成绩。不过时间匆匆流逝，等我练完所有的AW，金融危机都该结束了吧。。。。
所以，应该对AW做出一定的计划
1.阅读ARGUMENT题库，将其中的逻辑错误分类，然后针对不同的逻辑类型来练习。
2.ISSUE，这个我暂时还没有仔细思考，我计划先准备ARGUMENT。
我希望在10月底以前，对AW的认知能够达到本小组其他成员的平均水平，至少要跟得上大家的脚步，不然等组长回来我还是愣头青一个，那样就悲剧了。

另外，今天我已经开始一战红宝了，原本计划两个LIST用1个半小时。。。结果我用了两个半小时，而且背诵的效果还很不好。
检讨一下，因为我有几个月没有背过词汇了，注意力总是到处游走，所以造成了时间上的浪费。我要尽快回到正轨。

恩，就这样吧，刚背完红宝，来机房打字休息一下，然后去做数学作业。
晚上回去继续看AW，睡前再把前两个LIST复习一下。这是今天的安排。

明天开始上课了，:mad:，辉哥啊，真希望你多开几个星期的会，晚点再回来上课！！！
计量经济、数学、词汇、AW，OH...GOD BLESS ME!!!

lyy89000UID: 2699322

6# 智勇双全。瀚 楼主是不是和我学同个专业啊？计量经济学真是一门折腾死人的课...
ps:我也想报名参加但是我寒假的时候报了个班怕到时上网不会很方便...有没有更多的信息可以共享一下？

gongyuxiang1990UID: 2697832

6# 智勇双全。瀚
呵呵，加油吧，我也是个菜鸟~刚申请进组，组长还没审批呢，希望可以通过吧！

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

8# gongyuxiang1990
写不写的好，是能力问题
努不努力写，是态度问题
态度决定一切！
愿大家共同努力，实现飞跃！

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

7# lyy89000
我学经济学的。
可以啊~其实你也可以加入嘛，去报班学没时间上网的话自己私下练习，等能上网了大家还是可以交流~

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

刚从图书馆回来~~
哎。。要不是成都的云层总是很厚的话，我也可以算是披星戴月了。

今天完成了红宝两个LIST，终于在晚上复习的时候找到了背单词的感觉，终于能够集中注意力了。真好！
不过我苦恼的是。。。我看别人的6分作文，别说让我写了，我就光是看，都觉得很吃力——里面有一些单词不认识，还有很多单词认识但不会用。
这都是我以前不认真学习英语的恶果。
善有善报，恶有恶报，不是不报，时候未到。
多年以来不认真学习英语，总是靠感觉做题，居然蒙过了高考。但是，现在报应来了。
ISSUE、ARGUMENT那些题目，叫我用中文写，我应该能够分析得头头是道，不过要用英文写的话。。。那我就是捉襟见肘、抓耳挠腮也无可奈何。
看了一段李开复的自传，里面讲他刚到美国的时候英文很烂，他发现光是背单词是不行的，必须要在背的同时运用词汇。
我觉得很适合现在的我，明天，最多后天，我就要开始写了。写得烂无所谓吧~~
睡了，明天还得去占座位呢！同志们，加油！

gongyuxiang1990UID: 2697832

11# 智勇双全。瀚
有句老话：细节决定成败，态度决定高度。只要态度端正了，能力就不是问题，共同努力吧！
GOOD LUCK!

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

a7 处女写
7 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper.
"In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearview town council, because the current members are not protecting our environment. For example, during the past year the number of factories in Clearview has doubled, air pollution levels have increased, and the local hospital has treated 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses. If we elect Ann Green, the environmental problems in Clearview will certainly be solved."

    我的英文水平很糟糕，这是实话实说。所以，我把我的思路先用中文表达出来，以防止我拙劣的英文写作造成了意义表达上的谬误。
    题给原文逻辑错误如下：
    1. town council一般有5-50个议员，所以工厂数量的翻倍并不一定是Frank的主张，也许Frank正是council里面少数反对兴建工厂保护环境的议员之中的一员。
    2.  无论当初Frank对兴建工厂是持有什么态度，但是现在air pollution levels have increased and the local hospital has treated 25 percent more patient with respiratory illnesses,所以，该市的污染问题一定要得到解决。但是作者并没有给出Frank和Ann两个人的具体能力，所以，就解决污染这一问题，我们不知道他俩到底行不行.
    3.   而且，作为一个城市的mayoral,解决城市的污染问题是一项工作，但这不是唯一一项工作。其他的比如贫困救济，失业问题，医疗问题，道路建设，经济发展，城市对外形象等等问题。所以，只是以能否解决环境问题来选市长，太片面了。

以下是我的文章，恳请各位组长、组员兄弟姐妹以及前辈们点评

    This argument tells us the environment of Clearview is going to get worse because of the numbers of factories rising. The author concludes that if the residents of Clearview elect a member of Good Earth Coalition to be mayor, the pollution will be solved. To support the conclusion, the author reasons that the town council is to blame for the environment problems and Ann who is form Good Earth Coalition will definitely be able to solve the problem. But there are several logical fallacies on the conclusion, that making the argument highly suspect.
    We are merely informed that Frank is working for council and Ann is working for Good Earth Coalition, but we can’t ensure their opinions on the environment. There is no doubt that the council should be blame for the environment problems. But one council contains five or more members. Frank is just one of them. The argument does not provide evidence for that Frank was supporting the constructing of new factories. Frank may objected the plan of constructing factories but he was in the minority. As the some, not everyone in the Good Earth Coalition want to prove the environment right now, maybe some of them think it’s doesn’t matter. So we don’t know how Ann’s thinking.
    The author is looking forward to making us believe that Ann will solve the problems. But it’s unfounded. Obviously, we can’t  get more information about Ann and Frank. What had they done in the past years? How they composed when confronted with environment pollution or similar problems? We judge them according to nothing. We can’t ensure who has the capability of making the situation better. Perhaps both, or one of them, or none.
    The author considering that improving environment is the main principle of electing a mayor. General speaking, solving the environment problems is just one of the works of a mayor. As a president of area, a mayor must face to things like unemployment, poverty, medical system, education, economy and so on.
    To conclude, this argument is not persuasive. It is imprudent for the author to claim that Ann will absolutely improve the situation of Clearview. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that one candidate is more outstanding than another one in the main aspects. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author would have to show us more information about each candidate. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

智勇双全。瀚UID: 2632607

处女写修改篇
    According to the essay, it is told the environment of Clearview is going to get worse due to the increasingly big number of factories had been built recently. Yet, the author made a conclusion that the pollution will be solved if the residents of Clearview elect a member of Good Earth Coalition to be the mayor. To support the conclusion, the author further explained that the town council is to blame for the environmental issue and Ann who is the establisher of Good Earth Coalition is capable of coping with the pollution problem. But there are several logical fallacies on the conclusion, which make the conclusion highly suspect.
    We are merely informed that Frank is working for council and Ann is working for Good Earth Coalition, however their opinions about the environmental problem are not given in the content. Doubtlessly the council should be blamed for the pollution; nevertheless one council contains five or more members. Frank is just one of them. The essay does not provide explicit evidence to prove Frank was involved in the construction project. Frank may disagree on this, however since the decision was made by the whole council members, thus eventually the resolution was still adopted.
    The author obviously tried to convince the audiences that Ann would be a qualified leader to cope with this problem however further more information about Ann and Frank were not given. The audiences do not have a clue about the candidates’ backgrounds or political claims etc. Therefore no criteria have been set for the general people to judge who is more suitable to become the mayor. Besides, apart from environmental issue, a qualified mayor should also have a good understanding about economics, education and medical reform etc. In the accordance with this perspective, the conclusion that author made seems invalid.
    In conclusion, this article explained the author ignored the fact that Frank was not the only one who charges the city council; additionally the author overpraised Ann without providing valid and clear evidence. Instead, the author should set a more logical and explicit criterion for judging what is a good mayor, which will make the readers feel it is more persuasive and objective rather than feeling it is a personal opinion.

单眼皮vs肿眼皮UID: 2705887

14# 智勇双全。瀚

辛苦了！