寄托天下
查看: 1848|回复: 1

[i习作temp] ISSUE 43[ Emulate小组] [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
189
注册时间
2010-3-21
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2010-11-17 12:17:34 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 AK_小儿 于 2010-11-18 11:44 编辑

TOPIC: ISSUE43 - "To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards."
论点:Maintaining a high ethical and moral standard will help to be an effective leader but the successful leadership may not require the highest ethical and moral standards.
论据:
1 不同领域对伦理道德标准的要求程度不一样,例如商业领域,只要没有伤害社会和人类的行为就ok
2生活中很多事都无法做到面面俱到,在某一方面过度地保持高的伦理道德标准必然导致别的方面的疏忽。
3一个领导者不可能在每方面都保持很高的伦理道德标准,因为人无完人,而他只需要在其所领导的领域里在大的方面保持高的道德伦理标准就很可能成为成功的领导者。


I don’t strongly agree that to be an effective leader need to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards everywhere and every time.

No doubt that a successful leader needs lots of qualities including honesty, social mind, sense of responsibility and so on. A dishonest man would not get the real trust of others, which badly influences his leadership. Without social mind one gets less support from the society. And he who is irresponsible with everything cannot accomplish works seriously and perfectly. With these high standards of ethic and morality people get a successful and effective leadership as a public official.(阐述保持高的道德标准对领导者的重要性)

But it doesn’t mean that to be a successful leader must maintain those high standards everywhere and every time. I have three reasons stated below.(反驳命题观点,即成为成功领导者必须保持最高道德标准,3点理由)

First we found that different realm has different definition and extent of ethical and moral standards. Leader in business, for instance, don’t have an extreme duty in making society better and environment less polluted, but make the profit maximized when not doing harm to customers and society. Thus we can’t blame a business leader with no ethic and morality and judge him as an ineffective leader depending on those standards. But on the contrast, one who couldn’t get profit in business or even makes the business bankrupted shouldn’t be a successful leader. So judging a leader only by whether he maintains the highest standards is unfair to businessman even though in other realm including politic a leader should be ethical and moral.

And even in politic, maintaining those highest standards of morality unchangeable is not a wise decision for a leader. No one has the ability to make everything perfect, maintaining the highest ethical standards stubbornly inevitably lead other aspects ignored. As a leader of a nation, will you inform people every secret of the nation if they ask? Will you tell them the truth of the state secret only to maintain the ethic standards of honesty? Of course not, because those stupid behaviors may do much harm to the nation and even bury a nation when in wars. An effective leader must take every corner and every aspect into account. He should learn how to strike a balance among all aspects but not maintain ethic and morality inflexible.

At last, we must realize the limitation of human, no one could be perfect and of course no one could adhere the highest standards of morality in every aspect. A leader, firstly as a man, may have disadvantages which indicate some shortages of ethic and morality in some aspects even it may be private. But it may not be related with a leader’s success so much that to deny one’s achievements only by some scandals. When talking about Bill Clinton, what we firstly think about is his feats in improving the economics and the comprehensive national strength of America but not the scandal with Monica Lewinski. Admittedly, the scandal is a big spot in career of Bill Clinton which strongly violate the ethical and moral standards. However, his achievements are the sign of being an effective leader. He did what a president should do in his term of office though he didn’t maintain the highest ethical standards in his daily life. But that’s enough for him to be a great president.

In sum, we could not judge a leader with the highest standards of ethic and morality for the reasons above. Actually the highest standards in every aspect are barely accomplished. And that’s why we regard Bill Clinton as a great president.(words 589)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
171
注册时间
2010-9-8
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2010-11-19 23:56:10 |显示全部楼层
I don’t strongly agree that to be an effective leader need to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards everywhere and every time.

No doubt that a successful leader needs lots of qualities including honesty, social mind, sense of responsibility and so on. A dishonest man would not get the real trust of others, which badly influences his改为ones’会不会好点,这样更加正式点 leadership. Without social mind one gets less support from the society. And he who 同上,改为one is irresponsible with everything cannot accomplish works seriously and perfectly. With these high standards of ethic and morality people get a successful and effective leadership as a public official.(阐述保持高的道德标准对领导者的重要性)

But it doesn’t mean that to be a successful leader must maintain those high standards everywhere and every time 重复了,感觉可以用all the time. I have three reasons stated below.(反驳命题观点,即成为成功领导者必须保持最高道德标准,3点理由)

First we found that different realm has different definition and extent标准没有程度吧 of ethical and moral standards. Leader in business, for instance, don’t have an extreme duty in making society better and environment less polluted, but make the profit maximized when not doing harm to customers and society. Thus we can’t blame a business leader with no 感觉low会好点,没道德是不能当领导者的ethic and morality and judge him as an ineffective leader depending on those standards. But on the contrast, one who couldn’t get profit in business or even makes the business bankrupted shouldn’t be a successful leader. So judging a leader only by whether he maintains the highest standards is unfair to businessman even though in other realm including politic a leader should be ethical and moral.

And even in politic, maintaining those highest standards of morality unchangeable is not a wise decision for a leader. No one has the ability to make everything perfect, maintaining the highest ethical standards stubbornly and inevitably lead other aspects ignored. As a leader of a nation, will you inform people every secret of the nation if they ask? Will you tell them the truth of the state secret only to maintain the ethic standards of honesty? Of course not, because those stupid behaviors may do much harm to the nation and even bury a nation when in wars这个词用的很好. An effective leader must take every corner and every aspect into account. He should learn how to strike a balance among all aspects but not maintain ethic and morality inflexible.

At last, we must realize the limitation of human, no one could be perfect and of course no one could adhere the highest standards of morality in every aspect. A leader, firstly as a man, may have disadvantages which indicate some shortages of ethic and morality in some aspects even it may be private. But it may not be related with a leader’s success so much that to deny one’s achievements only by some scandals. When talking about Bill Clinton, what we firstly think about is his feats in improving the economics and the comprehensive national strength of America but not the scandal with Monica Lewinski. Admittedly, the scandal is a big spot in career of Bill Clinton which strongly violate the ethical and moral standards. However, his achievements are the sign of being an effective leader. He did what a president should do in his term of office though he didn’t maintain the highest ethical standards in his daily life. But that’s enough for him to be a great president.

In sum, we could not judge a leader with the highest standards of ethic and morality for the reasons above. Actually the highest standards in every aspect are barely accomplished. And that’s why we regard Bill Clinton as a great president.


本篇行文规整,文章架构清晰明了,很有逻辑。其次,遣词造句都比较高级。
希望继续保持。

使用道具 举报

RE: ISSUE 43[ Emulate小组] [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
ISSUE 43[ Emulate小组]
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1187446-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部